Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1541016876> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 59 of
59
with 100 items per page.
- W1541016876 abstract "The concern of this thesis is to examine the risk of forgery of signatures In the context of negotiable Instruments. The allocation of the said risk is submitted to represent one of the most controversial matters among the existing legal systems. It is believed that the issue under consideration has represented a major obstacle to the adoption of an acceptable unification of the law of negotiable instruments. The main task of this thesis is to propose an efficient allocation of the risk of the forgery of signatures. The scope of this enquiry is confined to the forgery of two forms of signatures, namely, that of the proprietor of a blank document and that of the payee or indorsee of a negotiable instrument. The forgery of such signatures is submitted to represent the major incident of the problem of risk allocation in the context of negotiable Instruments. Its involvement affects the currency of such documents and ultimately, it affects the determination of the property right of negotiable instruments, as well as the enforcement of the incorporated contractual promises and undertakings. In formulating the proposed allocation of the risk of the forgery of signatures, this thesis takes into account economic considerations, as well as the considerations relevant to the institution of negotiable Instrument So The theory underlying such an attitude is firstly, to reconcile with recent developments in the law, secondly to accommodate the needs of modern society and thirdly, to promote the efficiency of a significant finance instrument. The promotion of the efficiency of negotiable instruments would necessarily promote the efficiency of the market. Finally, this thesis examines the attitude of the major existing legal systems in allocating the forgery of signatures in the context of negotiable instruments. In particular, it examines the attitude of the Anglo-American and the Continental Geneva legal systems. It examines the theories underlying such an attitude. It examines the validity of the advanced theories. It examines the compatibility of the attitude of the said legal systems with the considerations underlying the institution of negotiable Instruments as well as those underlying economic reality. Ultimately, this thesis determines the most compatible legal system with the proposed risk allocation rule." @default.
- W1541016876 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1541016876 creator A5014002605 @default.
- W1541016876 date "1990-01-01" @default.
- W1541016876 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W1541016876 title "The risk of the forgery of signatures and the problem of conflicting entitlements in the law of negotiable instruments : a comparative study" @default.
- W1541016876 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
- W1541016876 type Work @default.
- W1541016876 sameAs 1541016876 @default.
- W1541016876 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1541016876 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
- W1541016876 hasAuthorship W1541016876A5014002605 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConcept C98088147 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConceptScore W1541016876C144133560 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConceptScore W1541016876C166957645 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConceptScore W1541016876C17744445 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConceptScore W1541016876C199539241 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConceptScore W1541016876C205649164 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConceptScore W1541016876C2779343474 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConceptScore W1541016876C2779777834 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConceptScore W1541016876C38652104 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConceptScore W1541016876C41008148 @default.
- W1541016876 hasConceptScore W1541016876C98088147 @default.
- W1541016876 hasLocation W15410168761 @default.
- W1541016876 hasOpenAccess W1541016876 @default.
- W1541016876 hasPrimaryLocation W15410168761 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W125134673 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W1560114443 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W1978129870 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W219812496 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W2234463016 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W2261885610 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W2486246423 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W2610336498 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W2762512945 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W2787198142 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W2901707921 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W2971195360 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W3084042822 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W3096361773 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W3121723100 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W3122864199 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W3123800525 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W3156154675 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W3165010167 @default.
- W1541016876 hasRelatedWork W96055412 @default.
- W1541016876 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1541016876 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1541016876 magId "1541016876" @default.
- W1541016876 workType "dissertation" @default.