FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1541615645> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1541615645 abstract "Global climate change is one of the most pressing environmental issues of the Twenty-first Century. Climate change threatens the integrity of the natural environment as well as the physical and social stability of the human environment. Current research focuses on the existence of global climate change, the legitimacy and integrity of the international climate change regime, and the development of national climate change programs. Much of this research concentrates on the authority and efficacy of the Kyoto Protocol. Since the Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC came into effect in February 2005, countries all over the world have intensified their efforts to develop comprehensive national systems to meet their Kyoto obligations or, as with the United States, to meet their own national climate change goals.Between now and the first Kyoto compliance period (2008-2012), nations will undoubtedly focus considerable attention on developing effective climate change policies. There is, however, a dearth of research examining the diverse tactics that regions are using to combat climate change. Regional climate change programs are growing in a seemingly haphazard manner within diverse and highly localized political and legal environments. In order to ensure the success of the Kyoto Protocol and the success of future international efforts to effectively manage climate change, there is an urgent need for comprehensive analysis of the disparate legal and political strategies the key actors are using. Alternative policies to address global climate change are being debated and used throughout the international community, but there is no objective data on the best political or scientific policies. Understanding the root causes of the successes and failures of these various regional approaches will significantly facilitate the formulation of effective long-term climate change policies. The United States (US) and the European Union (EU) provide an appropriate context for analyzing why and how national climate change policies differ and for evaluating the successes and failures of disparate approaches in both the short and long-term. As two of the wealthiest and most influential political entities in global politics and two of the heaviest emitters of greenhouse gases in the world, the actions of the European Union and the United States will profoundly impact both the ability of developed countries to meet their initial Kyoto obligations and the willingness of the developing world to become equal partners in the struggle against climate change. Thus, early leadership by the European Union and the United States is critical to reducing global greenhouse gas emissions and coordinating future global climate change efforts. Accordingly, this article will analyze the substantive and theoretical differences between the US and the EU’s climate change policies. As it compares and analyzes the policy regimes, this article will take as its basic premise that effective climate change regimes require participation in binding international regimes and a combination of mandatory regulations and voluntary regimes, rather than policies based on voluntary participation, further research, and delayed obligations. This article represents but a small step in the research and analysis that must be done. The goal of this article is simply to begin the process of assessing, comparing, and analyzing highly disparate political and legal approaches to managing climate change. One of the key rationales for this research is to provide policymakers with cogent and reliable data for use in formulating effective climate change policies. To this end, this article aims to analyze the basic principles of the climate change policies in practice, then to compare the policies and, finally, briefly to begin to examine some of the underlying reasons for the policy differences. This article is not intended to provide an exhaustive analysis of regional climate change policies. Rather, it is intended to introduce the basic principles and key differences of the US and EU climate change policies." @default.
• W1541615645 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1541615645 creator A5012637860 @default.
• W1541615645 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W1541615645 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1541615645 title "Climate Change Policies an Ocean Apart: EU & US Climate Change Policies Compared" @default.
• W1541615645 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W1541615645 type Work @default.
• W1541615645 sameAs 1541615645 @default.
• W1541615645 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W1541615645 countsByYear W15416156452015 @default.
• W1541615645 countsByYear W15416156452016 @default.
• W1541615645 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1541615645 hasAuthorship W1541615645A5012637860 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C115343472 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C132651083 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C189123395 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C2779872411 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C46295352 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C509746633 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C96240277 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConcept C99743013 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C107826830 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C115343472 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C132651083 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C162324750 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C17744445 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C18903297 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C189123395 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C199539241 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C205649164 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C2779872411 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C46295352 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C509746633 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C86803240 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C91375879 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C94625758 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C96240277 @default.
• W1541615645 hasConceptScore W1541615645C99743013 @default.
• W1541615645 hasLocation W15416156451 @default.
• W1541615645 hasOpenAccess W1541615645 @default.
• W1541615645 hasPrimaryLocation W15416156451 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W1605062029 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W1973051002 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2003665114 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2102464311 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2120345940 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2121561658 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2157607174 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2219255076 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2336752099 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2379330515 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2487707223 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2520839379 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2898235480 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W2910798305 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W3003799858 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W3082953305 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W3121970648 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W3122941937 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W3144214194 @default.
• W1541615645 hasRelatedWork W3203486726 @default.
• W1541615645 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1541615645 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1541615645 magId "1541615645" @default.
• W1541615645 workType "article" @default.