FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1543448431> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1543448431 startingPage "1" @default.
• W1543448431 abstract "IntroductionStakeholder InvolvementThe Participatory Design (PD) community widely acknowledges that participatory techniques such as workshops, storytelling, performance techniques, games and human-centred iterative prototyping, improve understanding and communication between stakeholders in technology development (e.g. Brandt & Grunnet, 2000; Brandt, 2006; Esnault, Daele, Zeiliger, & Charlier, 2009; Muller, 2007; Sanders, 2000). However, the effective exchange of the results of these participatory techniques is often problematic due to the lack of a shared 'language' among multiple stakeholder groups (Markus & Mao, 2004; Pekkola, Kaarilahti, & Pohjola, 2006; Robertson & Simonsen, 2012). At the same time, the priorities and values of each group can make effective communication difficult. This is further exacerbated when designing technology for stakeholders whose communication skills do not facilitate direct participation in design, such as children. Additionally, participatory techniques involving the end user do not typically address the problem of transferring the results of field studies to those responsible for technological development (dePaula, 2004; Pekkola et al.; 2006; Blomberg & Karasti, 2012). The role of software engineers and other technology designers as participants in the design process is not clearly represented by traditional PD approaches, therefore, we suggest tying insights about technology use closer to the development process overseen by software engineers using these tools.It is commonly accepted that design is a social process that involves communication and negotiation (Brandt, 2006). Yet the design of technology often involves jargon and terminology that is not always shared and well understood across different stakeholders (Muller, 2007). Differences not only exist between technical and non-technical stakeholders but also exist between different technical disciplines involved in the development process; such as between Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) field researchers and software engineers. In order to communicate effectively design participants need a shared language which is sensitive to their specific needs (Dearden & Rizvi, 2008; Miller, Pedell, Vetere, Sterling, & Howard, 2012).We propose a toolkit with three artefacts: technology probes, associated fieldwork and conceptual goal models. We argue that the combination of these three artefacts will help to mediate effective communication between participant stakeholders and will contribute to innovative designs. We illustrate our proposed toolkit with examples of technologies used by intergenerational families.Domestic Technology DevelopmentDesigning domestic technology (i.e., technology for the home) is particularly challenging (e.g. Howard, Kjeldskov, & Skov, 2006; Hagen & Robertson, 2009). Domestic technology is generally successful if it satisfies both functional and non-functional needs (Sandweg, Hassenzahl, & Kuhn, 2000; Hassenzahl, Platz, Burmester, & Lehner, 2000). For domestic technologies that support intergenerational interactions it is also important that every member of the family from the very young to the very old is capable of operating and enjoying it (Kromker & Sandweg, 2001). The grandparents who participated in our research were at least 70 years old and very inexperienced with technology. Their lack of confidence with technology and gaps in their knowledge about how modern technology could support relationships with their grandchildren made it difficult for them to articulate their needs. This meant that their involvement needed to be planned carefully.Additionally, there are characteristics of the home that make designing domestic technologies unique. Domestic needs are often unspoken; relationships are not straightforwardly hierarchical; lived life is idiosyncratic and even exotic (Howard et al., 2006). The grandparent-grandchild relationship is an example of a set of complex social interactions. …" @default.
• W1543448431 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1543448431 creator A5003298917 @default.
• W1543448431 creator A5020520774 @default.
• W1543448431 creator A5028824146 @default.
• W1543448431 creator A5078060345 @default.
• W1543448431 creator A5079262002 @default.
• W1543448431 date "2014-08-01" @default.
• W1543448431 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1543448431 title "Tools for participation: intergenerational technology design for the home" @default.
• W1543448431 cites W115394847 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W1205468864 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W1528333819 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W1548000849 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W1705278266 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W1748236508 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W1787442784 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W1964817993 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W1975235773 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W1984274464 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W1993763987 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2004946470 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2014295807 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2023174660 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2032649554 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2037361526 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2048454437 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2050884104 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2085052351 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2107482028 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2108523408 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2122873741 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2128555200 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2144023319 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2150634379 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2160472012 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2174769915 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2246181197 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2626702601 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W2786947868 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W371362487 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W587942963 @default.
• W1543448431 cites W613091551 @default.
• W1543448431 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1543448431 type Work @default.
• W1543448431 sameAs 1543448431 @default.
• W1543448431 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W1543448431 countsByYear W15434484312015 @default.
• W1543448431 countsByYear W15434484312017 @default.
• W1543448431 countsByYear W15434484312019 @default.
• W1543448431 countsByYear W15434484312021 @default.
• W1543448431 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1543448431 hasAuthorship W1543448431A5003298917 @default.
• W1543448431 hasAuthorship W1543448431A5020520774 @default.
• W1543448431 hasAuthorship W1543448431A5028824146 @default.
• W1543448431 hasAuthorship W1543448431A5078060345 @default.
• W1543448431 hasAuthorship W1543448431A5079262002 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C203663800 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C2775922551 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C2777455480 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C2777611551 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C2780938662 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C547195049 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C64364511 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C111919701 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C119599485 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C127413603 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C136764020 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C138885662 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C144024400 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C17744445 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C195094911 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C201305675 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C203663800 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C2775922551 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C2777455480 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C2777611551 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C2780938662 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C39549134 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C41008148 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C41895202 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C547195049 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C56739046 @default.
• W1543448431 hasConceptScore W1543448431C64364511 @default.

• next