FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1544243568> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1544243568 endingPage "513" @default.
• W1544243568 startingPage "491" @default.
• W1544243568 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION One of the basic rights of criminal defendants in our country is the right to a jury trial.1 This right includes, of course, as its most important element, the right to have the jury, rather than the judge, reach the requisite finding of 'guilty.' 2 Coupled with the jury trial right is the fact that the Due Process Clause protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged.3 Although the right to a jury trial in the criminal setting is absolute, the question remains whether the legislature can define the elements of a crime as questions of law and thus allow the judge to make findings relevant to those elements.4 This question arises when the legislature specifically allocates certain factual issues to be found by the judge,5 or when the statute is silent as to whether the judge or jury should make the findings.6 It seems obvious, based on the importance of the jury trial right, that when the statute is silent, the default rule should be that the jury is required to make the findings. However, not all courts have interpreted ambiguous statutes in this manner. For example, the federal circuits are split as to whether the judge is allowed to determine, during sentencing, the type of firearm used by the criminal convicted of 18 U.S.C. sec924(c), or whether the jury must make factual findings as to the type of weapon used when committing the violent or drug trafficking offense.7 Section 924(c) affords different penalties depending on the type of firearm used in relation to the crime.8 The judicial decisions surrounding the statute highlight the difficulty of drawing the thin line between the law and facts in statutory interpretation.9 In 1998, the Eleventh Circuit had the opportunity to interpret the statute and decide whether the judge or jury should make the findings relevant to the type of firearm. In United States v. AlborolaRodriguez,10 the court reviewed the decisions of the other circuits and ultimately concluded that, during sentencing, the judge, rather than the jury, is to determine the type of firearm used in the crime.11 Although the court attempted a well-reasoned decision, it came to the wrong conclusion, because it misinterpreted prior case law regarding the issue and relied too heavily on the Fifth Circuit's faulty and inconsistent ruling in United States v. Branch.12 Part II of this note gives a short history of 18 U.S.C. sec924(c) and explains the various circuit decisions which have interpreted that statute. Part III gives the facts of Alborola-Rodriguez and explains the Eleventh Circuit's reasoning. Part IV points out the error in the Eleventh Circuit's reasoning, attempts a statutory analysis of 18 U.S.C. sec924(c), and explains how the U.S. Supreme Court should rule if this issue were before it. Finally, Part V concludes that it is within the province of the jury to decide the type of firearm used in the crime and suggests specific legislative reforms. II. BACKGROUND A. History of 18 U.S.C. sec924(c) 18 U.S.C. sec924(c) was originally enacted as part of the Gun Control Act of 1968.13 In its original form, the statute provided a mandatory minimum sentence of between one and ten years for those criminals who used or carried a firearm unlawfully during the commission of any federal felony.14 Because of weaknesses that undermined the deterrent force of the statute,15 amended the statute several times. In 1984, in light of an accelerated crime rate, the Act was amended by the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 (CCCA).16 The CCCA, among other things, made it clear that Congress intended section 924(c) to be a separate offense and punishable in addition to the predicate.17 In 1986, sec924(c) was amended again by the Firearms Owners' Protection Act.18 Two of the most important changes from this amendment were to make sec 924(c) applicable to drug offenses and distinguish among the types of firearms, raising the mandatory minimum penalty to ten years if the firearm is a machine gun or equipped with a silencer. …" @default.
• W1544243568 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1544243568 creator A5069677902 @default.
• W1544243568 date "2000-01-01" @default.
• W1544243568 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1544243568 title "Who Makes the Call? Sentencing the Firearm User Under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) inunited States v. Alborola-Rodriguez" @default.
• W1544243568 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W1544243568 type Work @default.
• W1544243568 sameAs 1544243568 @default.
• W1544243568 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1544243568 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1544243568 hasAuthorship W1544243568A5069677902 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C200288055 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C2776071657 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C2776119841 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C2777278149 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C2778083451 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C2781238917 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConcept C87001247 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C15744967 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C17319257 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C17744445 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C199539241 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C200288055 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C2776071657 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C2776119841 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C2777278149 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C2778083451 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C2781238917 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C83009810 @default.
• W1544243568 hasConceptScore W1544243568C87001247 @default.
• W1544243568 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1544243568 hasLocation W15442435681 @default.
• W1544243568 hasOpenAccess W1544243568 @default.
• W1544243568 hasPrimaryLocation W15442435681 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W1541644672 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W1558502716 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W17532084 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W19642259 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W2009602224 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W2011089411 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W226246261 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W2597465206 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W2599744191 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W262647603 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W3121482433 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W3122864923 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W3123801238 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W3148701761 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W32795928 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W853983432 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W92674412 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W218721602 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W309825879 @default.
• W1544243568 hasRelatedWork W312272738 @default.
• W1544243568 hasVolume "2000" @default.
• W1544243568 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1544243568 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1544243568 magId "1544243568" @default.
• W1544243568 workType "article" @default.