FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1547229975> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1547229975 abstract "Excerpt] Despite almost 20 years of experience with a variety of alternative techniques in collective bargaining in education, there is no summary of the research on negotiation practices or survey of practice variations in use. The parties in negotiations have little to guide them in their investigation of the utility of what are commonly referred to as Interest-Based Bargaining (IBB) strategies. In order to give negotiators tools with which they can make choices appropriate to their needs based on current knowledge and practice, this report offers an informed discussion of the utility of various bargaining models. It provides: ◗ A summary of the research on the use of IBB techniques in educational collective bargaining; ◗ An overview of the current practice of IBB in education; ◗ Examples of IBB in practice in education. A survey of the literature on IBB practice and outcomes, including empirical, theoretical, and qualitative research, as well as case descriptions during the period of 1985-2002 on the use of IBB in educational, public sector, or industrial settings identified approximately 100 journal articles, dissertations, and cases in practitioner publications. The majority of the empirical research reviewed was too limited in scope and methodology to provide evidence that could be cited in this report. The analysis of the literature provided a set of internal and external factors affecting the use and utility of IBB, which were used to frame questions for facilitators and bargainers on current practice in IBB. A second goal of this report was to describe the current state of IBB practice, including its method and rate of diffusion, variations in practice, and factors motivating and supporting the use of IBB in educational settings. Given the absence of empirical data, practitioners providing IBB training and facilitation were identified as primary sources of information on current practice. Trainers/facilitators possess diverse and broad perspectives because of their interactions with multiple sites, their participation in professional associations or networks, and their (often) institutional affiliations with unions, employers, school boards, and state or federal employment relations agencies, and the variable IBB practices they employ. Seven practitioners who provide training and facilitation were interviewed: three staff members of NEA state affiliates, two FMCS commissioners, one practitioner in private practice, and one staff member of a state school board association. Among them, they have had direct experience facilitating more than 200 negotiations using IBB over viii NEA Collective Bargaining & Member Advocacy the past 10 years, in states with a variety of collective bargaining laws, as well as states without collective bargaining laws. These interviews provided detailed information on the IBB models in current use, which was used to create a matrix of variations in practices. The practitioner interviews also provided experience-based perceptions of the factors identified in the research as motivating IBB use and those supporting or suppressing bargaining team successes with IBB. While it cannot be claimed to represent a complete description of current practice, this summary provides a snapshot of the existing range of experience. In pursuit of sources of data on current IBB awareness and use in educational bargaining, 34 NEA state associations were contacted for information on IBB practice in their state. These contacts helped to identify sources of IBB training and facilitation and to give a rough depiction of the state of training activities and providers nationally. Based on the review of the research and interviews with facilitators, criteria were identified for choosing case studies to represent a crosssection of IBB experience. The three sites selected represent variation in state collective bargaining laws, the type of IBB model in use, geography, size of district, length of experience with IBB, the role and methods of the facilitator, and types and numbers of bargaining units and constituents participating in IBB. For each case, the primary negotiator for the union and the district were interviewed, and pertinent documents describing the process or outcomes of IBB were requested. Finally, based on practitioner reports, case studies, and the literature, a set of questions were developed for bargainers to discuss when considering the use of IBB and assessing the likelihood of its effectiveness in specific circumstances. This article is available at DigitalCommons@ILR: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/reports/16" @default.
• W1547229975 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1547229975 creator A5089495643 @default.
• W1547229975 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W1547229975 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1547229975 title "Interest-Based Bargaining in Education" @default.
• W1547229975 cites W106816304 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W114246451 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1206843315 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1511055539 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1517635314 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W153438472 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1538849870 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1557618240 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1612669784 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W161301749 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W191098642 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1976104404 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1980468105 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1990629027 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1995259012 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1996363289 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1996647339 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W1999174289 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W200068864 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2003057437 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2011870766 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2019683158 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2024994720 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W202804538 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2030216802 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2030755269 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2031339948 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2033393838 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2041043149 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2042559317 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2043682472 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2050159406 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2060111776 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2073540478 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2077299623 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2080461926 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2081566411 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2085951386 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2089979060 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2107224366 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2169595691 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W218401123 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W233861028 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W255382979 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2731517137 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2733246436 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W274807584 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2903368987 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W2992619698 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W299902650 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W305017439 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W311137360 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W312740813 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W322970844 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W342386391 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W350074461 @default.
• W1547229975 cites W90523613 @default.
• W1547229975 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W1547229975 type Work @default.
• W1547229975 sameAs 1547229975 @default.
• W1547229975 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W1547229975 countsByYear W15472299752014 @default.
• W1547229975 countsByYear W15472299752015 @default.
• W1547229975 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1547229975 hasAuthorship W1547229975A5089495643 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C136197465 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C2778012447 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C10138342 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C136197465 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C144133560 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C154945302 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C17744445 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C182306322 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C199360897 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C199539241 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C199776023 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C2778012447 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C39549134 @default.
• W1547229975 hasConceptScore W1547229975C41008148 @default.
• W1547229975 hasLocation W15472299751 @default.
• W1547229975 hasOpenAccess W1547229975 @default.
• W1547229975 hasPrimaryLocation W15472299751 @default.
• W1547229975 hasRelatedWork W1510381213 @default.
• W1547229975 hasRelatedWork W1972013104 @default.

• next