FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1550056710> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1550056710 endingPage "921" @default.
• W1550056710 startingPage "916" @default.
• W1550056710 abstract "Objectives To compare operative, pathological, and functional results of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out by a single surgeon. Methods After having experience with 32 transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, 317 extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, 30 transperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies and 10 extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies, 120 patients with prostate cancer were enrolled in this prospective randomized study and underwent either transperitoneal or extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The main outcome parameters between the two study groups were compared. Results No significant difference was found for age, body mass index, preoperative prostate‐specific antigen, clinical and pathological stage, Gleason score on biopsy and prostatectomy specimen, tumor volume, positive surgical margin, and lymph node status. Transperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy had shorter trocar insertion time (16.0 vs 25.9 min for transperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, P < 0.001), whereas extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy had shorter console time (101.5 vs 118.3 min, respectively, P < 0.001). Total operation time and total anesthesia time were found to be shorter in extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, without statistical significance (200.9 vs 193.2 min; 221.8 vs 213.3 min, respectively). Estimated blood loss was found to be lower for extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy ( P = 0.001). Catheterization and hospitalization times were observed to be shorter in extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (7.3 vs 5.8 days and 3.1 vs 2.3 days for transperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, respectively, P < 0.05). The time to oral diet was significantly shorter in extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (32.3 vs 20.1 h, P = 0.031). Functional outcomes (continence and erection) and complication rates were similar in both groups. Conclusions Extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy seems to be a good alternative to transperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with similar operative, pathological and functional results. As the surgical field remains away from the bowel, postoperative return to normal diet and early discharge can be favored." @default.
• W1550056710 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1550056710 creator A5005265487 @default.
• W1550056710 creator A5032042230 @default.
• W1550056710 creator A5059027519 @default.
• W1550056710 creator A5090507727 @default.
• W1550056710 date "2015-07-26" @default.
• W1550056710 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1550056710 title "Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot‐assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study" @default.
• W1550056710 cites W1982363535 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W1985548986 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W1988028145 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2014255121 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2031240285 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2034671424 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2043353211 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2048553808 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2063639049 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2064694090 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2069805268 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2082752278 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2086262619 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2088852280 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2096998881 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2116632487 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2117792530 @default.
• W1550056710 cites W2142193039 @default.
• W1550056710 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12854" @default.
• W1550056710 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26212891" @default.
• W1550056710 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1550056710 type Work @default.
• W1550056710 sameAs 1550056710 @default.
• W1550056710 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W1550056710 countsByYear W15500567102015 @default.
• W1550056710 countsByYear W15500567102016 @default.
• W1550056710 countsByYear W15500567102017 @default.
• W1550056710 countsByYear W15500567102018 @default.
• W1550056710 countsByYear W15500567102019 @default.
• W1550056710 countsByYear W15500567102020 @default.
• W1550056710 countsByYear W15500567102021 @default.
• W1550056710 countsByYear W15500567102022 @default.
• W1550056710 countsByYear W15500567102023 @default.
• W1550056710 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1550056710 hasAuthorship W1550056710A5005265487 @default.
• W1550056710 hasAuthorship W1550056710A5032042230 @default.
• W1550056710 hasAuthorship W1550056710A5059027519 @default.
• W1550056710 hasAuthorship W1550056710A5090507727 @default.
• W1550056710 hasBestOaLocation W15500567101 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConcept C2779466945 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConcept C2779819210 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConceptScore W1550056710C121608353 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConceptScore W1550056710C126322002 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConceptScore W1550056710C126894567 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConceptScore W1550056710C141071460 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConceptScore W1550056710C2776111594 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConceptScore W1550056710C2779466945 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConceptScore W1550056710C2779819210 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConceptScore W1550056710C2780047204 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConceptScore W1550056710C2780192828 @default.
• W1550056710 hasConceptScore W1550056710C71924100 @default.
• W1550056710 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W1550056710 hasLocation W15500567101 @default.
• W1550056710 hasLocation W15500567102 @default.
• W1550056710 hasOpenAccess W1550056710 @default.
• W1550056710 hasPrimaryLocation W15500567101 @default.
• W1550056710 hasRelatedWork W1962686129 @default.
• W1550056710 hasRelatedWork W2066092646 @default.
• W1550056710 hasRelatedWork W2075009997 @default.
• W1550056710 hasRelatedWork W2084343070 @default.
• W1550056710 hasRelatedWork W2142217672 @default.
• W1550056710 hasRelatedWork W2809154421 @default.
• W1550056710 hasRelatedWork W3023913677 @default.
• W1550056710 hasRelatedWork W3089922404 @default.
• W1550056710 hasRelatedWork W635547689 @default.
• W1550056710 hasRelatedWork W2023475404 @default.
• W1550056710 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W1550056710 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1550056710 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1550056710 magId "1550056710" @default.
• W1550056710 workType "article" @default.