Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1550197932> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 items per page.
- W1550197932 abstract "Si pendant longtemps, les concepts de Relations Internationales (RI) et d’Etudes Internationales (EI) ont ete assimiles, il est aujourd’hui admis que ce sont deux disciplines a part entiere. On range d’ailleurs de plus en plus les relations internationales dans le catalogue des sciences politiques dans la mesure ou elles regissent les rapports entre les Etats. Les etudes internationales sont, quant a elles, apprehendees comme l’interaction de plusieurs disciplines. Ainsi, malgre les debats, la majorite des auteurs s’accorde pour dire que ces deux disciplines se distinguent de deux facons. D’une part par leur approche methodologique et d’autre part par leur conception ontologique. Autrement dit, les etudes internationales se caracterisent par leur interdisciplinarite, alors que les relations internationales representent une certaine specialisation. Cependant, cet essai demontrera que l’existence de ces deux facteurs de distinction ne justifie pas une pertinence egale. Finalement, l’interdisciplinarite reste le critere par excellence qui permet de differencier les relations internationales des etudes internationales. For a long time, the concepts of International Relations (IR) and International Studies (IS) have been assimilated and it is now recognized that these are two disciplines of their own. International Relations are placed in the field of political sciences as they govern relations between States. International Studies are understood as an interaction of several disciplines. Thus, despite the debate, most authors agree to say that these two disciplines differ in two ways: on the one hand by their methodological approach, and on the other hand by their ontological design. In other words, International Studies are characterized by their interdisciplinarity while International Relations represent a specialization. However, this essay will demonstrate that if these two distinguishing factors exist, they do not have the same relevance. In the end, the interdisciplinarity remains the ultimate criterion that differentiates International Relations and International Studies." @default.
- W1550197932 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1550197932 creator A5071214167 @default.
- W1550197932 date "2014-04-13" @default.
- W1550197932 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W1550197932 title "Quel facteur est le plus significatif pour distinguer les Études internationales des Relations internationales : Sa méthodologie ou son regard ontologique plus élargi?" @default.
- W1550197932 cites W2123900650 @default.
- W1550197932 cites W2136482535 @default.
- W1550197932 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W1550197932 type Work @default.
- W1550197932 sameAs 1550197932 @default.
- W1550197932 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1550197932 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1550197932 hasAuthorship W1550197932A5071214167 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConcept C34355311 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConceptScore W1550197932C138885662 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConceptScore W1550197932C15708023 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConceptScore W1550197932C17744445 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConceptScore W1550197932C199539241 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConceptScore W1550197932C34355311 @default.
- W1550197932 hasConceptScore W1550197932C94625758 @default.
- W1550197932 hasLocation W15501979321 @default.
- W1550197932 hasOpenAccess W1550197932 @default.
- W1550197932 hasPrimaryLocation W15501979321 @default.
- W1550197932 hasVolume "7" @default.
- W1550197932 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1550197932 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1550197932 magId "1550197932" @default.
- W1550197932 workType "article" @default.