FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1551101530> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1551101530 abstract "In the modern media age, the number of media venues, along with the types of information and programming those venues carry, is exploding. Nowhere is that explosion more evident than with the Internet. On the positive side, the Internet offers a wealth of information and communications opportunities. But, on the negative side, it brings a boundless store of harmful material within easy access of children. In recognition of the destructive effects of such material - especially obscenity and pornography - Congress on several occasions has tried to curb the accessibility of this material to children. The Supreme Court, however, has struck down these attempts using a strict scrutiny approach. Part I of this Article outlines the case against the Court's current use of strict scrutiny. This approach hinges on a single factor: whether or not a regulation of speech hinges on a content distinction. Once such a distinction is found, the law is almost always struck down, regardless of the speech burdens actually imposed by the law, whether the subject speech is in plentiful supply in other media venues, or whether the laws would result in a banishment of certain ideas from the public discourse. This myopic focus on content discrimination is outmoded in today's multimedia world and prohibits regulations of speech even when the burdens imposed by the law are slight and the speech remains available and accessible in the broader marketplace of ideas. Part II of the Article proposes a new judicial model for evaluating content-based laws regulating media programming that is not political speech. This new model examines the actual burdens placed on the subject speech. It also considers perhaps the most vulnerable freedom in the current media environment - the freedom of the unwilling recipient to avoid unwanted and offensive media speech. Furthermore, the new model - a variation of the intermediate scrutiny approach now used for so-called content-neutral regulations of speech - takes into account and incorporates the realities of the modern media world. It does so by recognizing that there is a vast array of media channels through which any one type of speech can flow, and that a restriction of speech in one venue may not rise to the level of an unconstitutional censorship." @default.
• W1551101530 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1551101530 creator A5037554165 @default.
• W1551101530 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W1551101530 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1551101530 title "A New First Amendment Model for Evaluating Content-Based Regulation of Internet Pornography: Revising the Strict Scrutiny Model to Better Reflect the Realities of the Modern Media Age" @default.
• W1551101530 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1551101530 type Work @default.
• W1551101530 sameAs 1551101530 @default.
• W1551101530 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1551101530 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1551101530 hasAuthorship W1551101530A5037554165 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C2776050585 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C2777154746 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C2781301322 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C110875604 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C136764020 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C144024400 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C17744445 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C199539241 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C2776050585 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C2777154746 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C2777363581 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C2777855551 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C2778272461 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C2781301322 @default.
• W1551101530 hasConceptScore W1551101530C41008148 @default.
• W1551101530 hasLocation W15511015301 @default.
• W1551101530 hasOpenAccess W1551101530 @default.
• W1551101530 hasPrimaryLocation W15511015301 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W1488000778 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W1504464921 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W1596851758 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W1601148728 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W2077873593 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W2280094115 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W2406221071 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W2462332286 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W2580563601 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W2768361906 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W2907863520 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W2924952955 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W3123506941 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W3146758599 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W3172103148 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W3185486908 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W3212476454 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W3212817753 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W33608677 @default.
• W1551101530 hasRelatedWork W2191592881 @default.
• W1551101530 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1551101530 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1551101530 magId "1551101530" @default.
• W1551101530 workType "article" @default.