FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1551114486> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1551114486 endingPage "1518" @default.
• W1551114486 startingPage "1510" @default.
• W1551114486 abstract "Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of two pressure ulcer risk assessment scales and one generic nursing assessment tool.Guidelines for pressure ulcer prevention recommend an initial risk screening of all patients, followed by appropriate nursing interventions. Additionally, personal and financial resources have to be allocated carefully to avoid excessive or too little treatment. Risk assessments should be accurate and applicable, and some studies showed that generic nursing tools also provide specific information for nursing diagnoses, like risk for pressure ulcer.Cross sectional observational study.A total of 1053 adult patients of a university hospital in Germany were investigated. For each patient, the Braden Scale, the Waterlow Scale and the Care Dependency Scale were completed. A skin inspection was conducted by trained nurses. Correlations between the three scales and the mean values of each pressure ulcer risk assessment scales for each Care Dependency Scale value were calculated. To determine the association between susceptibility to pressure ulcer and observed pressure ulcer, the area under the curve was calculated.There was a higher correlation between the Braden Scale and the Care Dependency Scale (r = 0.82) than between the two pressure ulcer risk assessment scales (-0.65). The highest area under the curve was reached by the Braden Scale (0.86), followed by the Care Dependency Scale (0.83) and the Waterlow Scale (0.81). Only the Braden Scale (cut-off 18) and the Care Dependency Scale (cut-off 65) reached the psychometric requirements of at least 70% sensitivity and 70% specificity.The Care Dependency Scale could be used for both a general nursing assessment and as a screening tool for risk for pressure ulcers. The Braden Scale showed the highest association with the occurrence of pressure ulcer.The Care Dependency Scale is a useful screening tool to identify patients at risk for pressure ulcers. Nursing assessment activities might be reduced by using a generic nursing assessment tool also for specific risk screening." @default.
• W1551114486 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1551114486 creator A5032845180 @default.
• W1551114486 creator A5040409145 @default.
• W1551114486 creator A5050654258 @default.
• W1551114486 creator A5051846215 @default.
• W1551114486 creator A5067571830 @default.
• W1551114486 creator A5078948882 @default.
• W1551114486 date "2010-05-13" @default.
• W1551114486 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W1551114486 title "Diagnostic accuracy of two pressure ulcer risk scales and a generic nursing assessment tool. A psychometric comparison" @default.
• W1551114486 cites W1721208361 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W183546627 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W1971579841 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W1988135093 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W1991284981 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W1993781230 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W1995268910 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W1997936732 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2032266037 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2039780601 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2041128157 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W205577898 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2064229278 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2070080552 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2078706035 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2082901675 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2083530417 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2092249889 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2098119400 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2098357045 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2112030792 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2114840228 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2115645696 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2130109724 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2133539741 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2144304515 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2162795232 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W2332434165 @default.
• W1551114486 cites W39675316 @default.
• W1551114486 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03005.x" @default.
• W1551114486 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20579196" @default.
• W1551114486 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1551114486 type Work @default.
• W1551114486 sameAs 1551114486 @default.
• W1551114486 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W1551114486 countsByYear W15511144862014 @default.
• W1551114486 countsByYear W15511144862015 @default.
• W1551114486 countsByYear W15511144862016 @default.
• W1551114486 countsByYear W15511144862017 @default.
• W1551114486 countsByYear W15511144862018 @default.
• W1551114486 countsByYear W15511144862019 @default.
• W1551114486 countsByYear W15511144862020 @default.
• W1551114486 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1551114486 hasAuthorship W1551114486A5032845180 @default.
• W1551114486 hasAuthorship W1551114486A5040409145 @default.
• W1551114486 hasAuthorship W1551114486A5050654258 @default.
• W1551114486 hasAuthorship W1551114486A5051846215 @default.
• W1551114486 hasAuthorship W1551114486A5067571830 @default.
• W1551114486 hasAuthorship W1551114486A5078948882 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C12174686 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C140117577 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C2779033854 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C2780813765 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C2984889486 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C534262118 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C121332964 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C12174686 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C126322002 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C140117577 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C142724271 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C159110408 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C17744445 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C1862650 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C199539241 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C23131810 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C27415008 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C2778755073 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C2779033854 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C2779473830 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C2780813765 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C2984889486 @default.
• W1551114486 hasConceptScore W1551114486C38652104 @default.

• next