FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1556840903> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1556840903 abstract "One of the greatest challenges facing patent holders is the enforcement of their rights against foreign (non-U.S.) infringers. Jurisdictional rules can prevent patent holders from filing patent infringement suits where they have the greatest likelihood of success in enforcement, such as where the infringer is located, has his seat, or holds his assets; instead, patent holders must file lawsuits in the country where the infringed patent was issued. But filing a patent lawsuit in a U.S. court against a non-U.S. infringer may be subject to various difficulties associated with the fact that U.S. substantive patent law (particularly as regards its territorial scope) and conflict of laws rules are not always compatible and interoperable with the conflict of laws rules of other countries. Such insufficient compatibility and interoperability can lead to U.S. judgments not being enforceable outside the United States. In the Hague Conference’s Judgments Project, which the Conference re-launched in 2012, the United States has an opportunity to negotiate internationally uniform conflict of laws rules to improve cross-border litigation, including cross-border patent litigation. This article provides data on cross-border patent litigation that can be used to assess the extent to which the United States should be concerned about cross-border patent litigation problems and the degree to which the United States should be involved in the Judgments Project to improve cross-border patent litigation. The statistics in this article are the result of an empirical study of 6,420 patent cases filed in 2004, 2009, and 2012 in nine selected U.S. federal district courts – the federal district courts in which the largest numbers of patent cases per court were filed in 2012. The results show that the numbers of patent cases involving foreign parties are on the rise, although the percentage of such cases in the total number of patent cases filed did not increase from 2009 to 2012. The article brings up to date the author’s earlier research on cross-border aspects of patent litigation, contributes to the rapidly growing body of empirical literature on patent litigation (including the literature on the “patent troll” phenomenon), and enriches the literature on foreign litigants in patent disputes and on transnational litigation in general (both of which suffer from a dearth of statistical data)." @default.
• W1556840903 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1556840903 creator A5017371140 @default.
• W1556840903 date "2014-03-28" @default.
• W1556840903 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1556840903 title "Foreigners in U.S. Patent Litigation: An Empirical Study of Patent Cases Filed in Nine U.S. Federal District Courts in 2004, 2009, and 2012 (Presentation)" @default.
• W1556840903 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1556840903 type Work @default.
• W1556840903 sameAs 1556840903 @default.
• W1556840903 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1556840903 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1556840903 hasAuthorship W1556840903A5017371140 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C115910719 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C2777029862 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C2777134139 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C2984145337 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConcept C62100270 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C115910719 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C144133560 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C162324750 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C17744445 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C190253527 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C199539241 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C199776023 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C2777029862 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C2777134139 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C2779777834 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C2984145337 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C34974158 @default.
• W1556840903 hasConceptScore W1556840903C62100270 @default.
• W1556840903 hasLocation W15568409031 @default.
• W1556840903 hasOpenAccess W1556840903 @default.
• W1556840903 hasPrimaryLocation W15568409031 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W1485849204 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W1520792781 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W1562807039 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W1607284014 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W1811710468 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W2101895272 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W2271785575 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W2273608909 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W2379729632 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W2389128436 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W2483926204 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W2761186212 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W2766405794 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W3123091094 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W3124872814 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W3126995567 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W3171461025 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W3207995056 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W1665512671 @default.
• W1556840903 hasRelatedWork W1730928051 @default.
• W1556840903 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1556840903 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1556840903 magId "1556840903" @default.
• W1556840903 workType "article" @default.