FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W155778855> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W155778855 endingPage "214" @default.
• W155778855 startingPage "209" @default.
• W155778855 abstract "Aim Fissure sealing is a preventive and therapeutic procedure by which the occlusal surface of the fissure system of the teeth is closed with sealing materials for prevention and therapy of initial caries. The fissures of the teeth treated with sealing materials become physiologically clean spots, with no possibility for the developement of caries lesion. The aim of the study was to clinically compare three different fissure sealing materials after one year of use. Methods The study included 73 subjects, 29 (39.7%) male, and 44 (60.3%) female, aged 7-21 years. Sealing was carried out on 150 healthy permenant molars with three different sealing materials divided into three groups: Teethmate F1 (Kuraray) in 48 teeth, Helioseal Clear Chroma (Vivadent) in 52 teeth, and Tetric Flow (Vivadent) in 50 teeth. In each subject, at least two different sealing materials were used. On analysis of the degree of retention and occurrence of secondary caries lesion, modified criteria described by Kilpatrick et al. (1996) were used: 0=no loss, 1=loss of 1/3 of the seal, 2=loss of 2/3 of the seal, 3=complete loss of the seal (more than 2/3 of the material). The criteria for evaluation of the occurrence of secondary caries were: 0=no caries, 1=caries. Results After 12 months, complete retention of the Teethmate F1 material was 77.1%, of Helioseal Clear Chroma 76.9%, and of Tetric Flow 84%. There is no statistically significant difference in retention among the sealing materials after 12 months. Tetric Flow showed a better appearance of retention, although not statistically significant (p=0.287). Out of 150 sealed teeth, at 12 months caries was found in only 3 teeth: 2 in the group sealed with Teethmate F1 and one in the group sealed with Helioseal Clear Chroma. In the group sealed with Tetric Flow, no caries was recorded at 12 months. Conclusion Comparison of the degree of retention showed flowable composite as a sealing material to yield better results than the classic sealing materials, although the difference was not statistically demonstrated. The low incidence of caries in the fissure system between sealed teeth indicated a good preventive action of the sealing materials. Because of the great supply of flowable composites on the market, differing in the content and consistency, and a great number of various enamel-dentin adhesive systems, there is a need of additional long-term research to determine their clinical justifiability." @default.
• W155778855 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W155778855 creator A5043180458 @default.
• W155778855 creator A5060777177 @default.
• W155778855 date "2006-06-01" @default.
• W155778855 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W155778855 title "Clinical evaluation of three different materials for fissure sealing after 12 months" @default.
• W155778855 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16933833" @default.
• W155778855 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W155778855 type Work @default.
• W155778855 sameAs 155778855 @default.
• W155778855 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W155778855 countsByYear W1557788552020 @default.
• W155778855 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W155778855 hasAuthorship W155778855A5043180458 @default.
• W155778855 hasAuthorship W155778855A5060777177 @default.
• W155778855 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W155778855 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W155778855 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W155778855 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W155778855 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W155778855 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W155778855 hasConcept C2777755289 @default.
• W155778855 hasConcept C2780749890 @default.
• W155778855 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W155778855 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W155778855 hasConceptScore W155778855C142362112 @default.
• W155778855 hasConceptScore W155778855C153349607 @default.
• W155778855 hasConceptScore W155778855C159985019 @default.
• W155778855 hasConceptScore W155778855C192562407 @default.
• W155778855 hasConceptScore W155778855C199343813 @default.
• W155778855 hasConceptScore W155778855C202271784 @default.
• W155778855 hasConceptScore W155778855C2777755289 @default.
• W155778855 hasConceptScore W155778855C2780749890 @default.
• W155778855 hasConceptScore W155778855C29694066 @default.
• W155778855 hasConceptScore W155778855C71924100 @default.
• W155778855 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W155778855 hasLocation W1557788551 @default.
• W155778855 hasLocation W1557788552 @default.
• W155778855 hasOpenAccess W155778855 @default.
• W155778855 hasPrimaryLocation W1557788551 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W1977443257 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2024056404 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2058570703 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2059730778 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2087717463 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2101543810 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2347640754 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2360824136 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2364764958 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2381071969 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2381321869 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2388202301 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2408146314 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2418043846 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2782451502 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W2981556534 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W3033414192 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W3201663925 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W3205408166 @default.
• W155778855 hasRelatedWork W49780859 @default.
• W155778855 hasVolume "60" @default.
• W155778855 isParatext "false" @default.
• W155778855 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W155778855 magId "155778855" @default.
• W155778855 workType "article" @default.