FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1559967327> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1559967327 abstract "Background Maintenance intravenous fluids are frequently used in hospitalised children who cannot maintain adequate hydration through enteral intake. Traditionally used hypotonic fluids have been associated with hyponatraemia and subsequent morbidity and mortality. Use of isotonic fluid has been proposed to reduce complications. Objectives To establish and compare the risk of hyponatraemia by systematically reviewing studies where isotonic is compared with hypotonic intravenous fluid for maintenance purposes in children. Secondly, to compare the risk of hypernatraemia, the effect on mean serum sodium concentration and the rate of attributable adverse effects of both fluid types in children. Search methods We ran the search on 17 June 2013. We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP), and ISI Web of Science. We also searched clinical trials registers and screened reference lists. We updated this search in October 2014 but these results have not yet been incorporated. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials that compared isotonic versus hypotonic intravenous fluids for maintenance hydration in children. Data collection and analysis At least two authors assessed and extracted data for each trial. We presented dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and continuous outcomes as mean differences with 95% CIs. Main results Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1106 patients. The majority of the studies were performed in surgical or intensive care populations (or both). There was considerable variation in the composition of intravenous fluid, particularly hypotonic fluid, used in the studies. There was a low risk of bias for most of the included studies. Ten studies provided data for our primary outcome, a total of 449 patients in the analysis received isotonic fluid, while 521 received hypotonic fluid. Those who received isotonic fluid had a substantially lower risk of hyponatraemia (17% versus 34%; RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.60, high quality evidence). It is unclear whether there is an increased risk of hypernatraemia when isotonic fluids are used (4% versus 3%; RR 1.24; 95% CI 0.65 to 2.38, nine studies, 937 participants, low quality evidence), although the absolute number of patients developing hypernatraemia was low. Most studies had safety restrictions included in their methodology, preventing detailed investigation of serious adverse events. Authors' conclusions Isotonic intravenous maintenance fluids with sodium concentrations similar to that of plasma reduce the risk of hyponatraemia when compared with hypotonic intravenous fluids. These results apply for the first 24 hours of administration in a wide group of primarily surgical paediatric patients with varying severities of illness." @default.
• W1559967327 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1559967327 creator A5017997488 @default.
• W1559967327 creator A5033802389 @default.
• W1559967327 creator A5035163396 @default.
• W1559967327 creator A5035895332 @default.
• W1559967327 creator A5060978364 @default.
• W1559967327 creator A5072346705 @default.
• W1559967327 creator A5077133075 @default.
• W1559967327 creator A5087458534 @default.
• W1559967327 date "2014-12-18" @default.
• W1559967327 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W1559967327 title "Isotonic versus hypotonic solutions for maintenance intravenous fluid administration in children" @default.
• W1559967327 cites W1635434451 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W1751498741 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W1870769214 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W1970783853 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W1975350755 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W1985718650 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2003296025 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2009260581 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2009509231 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2021870961 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2026467236 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2039853180 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2040337239 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2055434161 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2083445892 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2093219657 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2098249739 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2102831918 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2112016645 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2114042072 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2115722650 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2131121938 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2134915804 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2143019494 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2156306409 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2164492406 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2167857386 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W2418725338 @default.
• W1559967327 cites W4248727097 @default.
• W1559967327 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009457.pub2" @default.
• W1559967327 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25519949" @default.
• W1559967327 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1559967327 type Work @default.
• W1559967327 sameAs 1559967327 @default.
• W1559967327 citedByCount "59" @default.
• W1559967327 countsByYear W15599673272015 @default.
• W1559967327 countsByYear W15599673272016 @default.
• W1559967327 countsByYear W15599673272017 @default.
• W1559967327 countsByYear W15599673272018 @default.
• W1559967327 countsByYear W15599673272019 @default.
• W1559967327 countsByYear W15599673272020 @default.
• W1559967327 countsByYear W15599673272021 @default.
• W1559967327 countsByYear W15599673272022 @default.
• W1559967327 countsByYear W15599673272023 @default.
• W1559967327 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1559967327 hasAuthorship W1559967327A5017997488 @default.
• W1559967327 hasAuthorship W1559967327A5033802389 @default.
• W1559967327 hasAuthorship W1559967327A5035163396 @default.
• W1559967327 hasAuthorship W1559967327A5035895332 @default.
• W1559967327 hasAuthorship W1559967327A5060978364 @default.
• W1559967327 hasAuthorship W1559967327A5072346705 @default.
• W1559967327 hasAuthorship W1559967327A5077133075 @default.
• W1559967327 hasAuthorship W1559967327A5087458534 @default.
• W1559967327 hasBestOaLocation W15599673272 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C117277713 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C2776703092 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C2910682862 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C3018237090 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C44315111 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C77056095 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C78722104 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C117277713 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C126322002 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C168563851 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C17744445 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C177713679 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C194828623 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C197934379 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C199539241 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C2776478404 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C2776703092 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C2779473830 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C2910682862 @default.
• W1559967327 hasConceptScore W1559967327C3018237090 @default.

• next