FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W156161835> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W156161835 abstract "The study investigates the effectiveness of reflective essays in improving students’ scores in writing recount texts and students’ responses toward the implementation of the technique. A reflective essay is a piece of writing that basically demands the writer to write about their activities and feelings during a particular subject. In this study, the teaching and learning processes are based on the Indonesian curriculum and use the genre-based approach. As suggested by Freeze and Joyce (2002) that the genre-based approach is the most effective methodology for implementing text-based curriculum. The study employs a quasi-experimental design. Sixty students of one senior high school in Bandung, Indonesia, are involved as the participants of this study. The students have grouped into the experimental and control groups. The data have obtained from several sources, including pre-test, post-test, and questionnaire. The pre-test and post-test scores have analyzed by using the independent t-test while the questionnaire has analyzed by using percentages. The findings reveal that the use of reflective essay technique is effective in improving students’ scores in writing recount texts. The result of the independent t-test shows students’ scores of both control and experimental groups have improved but the improvement of the experimental group which has received the reflective essay technique is better. It is indicated by the statistical computation in which the means of control and experimental groups’ scores before receiving the treatments are (M = 58.90) and (M = 60.40) while the means of control and experimental groups’ scores after receiving the treatments are (M = 71.10) and (M = 79.83). Moreover, the result of the independent t-test computation of post-test scores shows the tobt (4.042), which is greater than tcrit (2.000) at the level of significance 0.05. It means that the null hypothesis is rejected as there is a significant difference between students’ post-test scores in the experimental and control groups. The questionnaire results reveal that most students are interested in the implementation of reflective essays technique in teaching recount texts. The study recommends teachers for implementing reflective essay technique in teaching recount texts due to its benefits and further researchers for conducting study of reflective essay techniques in other genre.Keywords: Reflective Essay, Recount Text Penelitian ini menyelidiki keefektifan dari reflective essays dalam meningkatkan nilai menulis teks recount siswa dan respon siswa terhadap penerapan dari teknik. Reflective essay adalah sebuah tulisan yang menuntut penulisnya untuk menulis tentang aktivitas dan perasaan penulis selama pelajaran tertentu. Proses belajar-mengajar dalam penelitian ini berdasarkan kurikulum Indonesia dan menggunakan pendekatan genre-based. Seperti yang disarankan oleh Freeze dan Joyce (2002) bahwa pendekatan genre-based merupakan metode yang paling efektif dalam menerapkan kurikulum text-based. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain quasi-experimental. Enam puluh siswa dari salah satu sekolah menengah atas di Bandung dilibatkan untuk menjadi partisipan dari penelitian ini. Siswa dikelompokkan menjadi kelompok experimental dan kelompok kontrol. Data diperoleh dari berbagai sumber, seperti pre-test, post-test, dan questionnaire. Nilai dari pre-test dan post-test dianalisis dengan menggunakan independent t-test sedangkan hasil questionnaire dianalisis dengan menggunakan persentase. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan teknik reflective essay efektif dalam meningkatkan nilai menulis teks recount siswa. Hasil dari independent t-test menunjukkan bahwa nilai siswa dari kedua kelompok mengalami peningkatan, namun peningkatan yang dialami siswa pada kelompok experimental lebih baik. Hal ini terlihat dari perhitungan statistik dimana nilai rata-rata (means) dari kelompok kontrol dan experimental sebelum mendapatkan perawatan (M=58.90) dan (M=60.40) sementara nilai rata-rata (means) dari kelompok kontrol dan experimental setelah mendapatkan perawatan (M=71.10) dan (M=79.83). Terlebih lagi, hasil dari perhitungan independent t-test pada nilai post-test menunjukkan bahwa tobt (4.042), lebih besar dari tcrit (2.000) pada level signifikan 0.05. Hipotesis null pada penelitian ini ditolak mengingat adanya perbedaan signifikan antara nilai post-test siswa pada kelompok kontrol dan experimental. Hasil questionnaire menunjukkan bahwa kebanyakan siswa tertarik dalam penerapan teknik reflective essays dalam pengajaran teks recount. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan guru untuk menerapkan teknik reflective essay dalam pengajaran teks recount berdasarkan keuntungannya dan peneliti lain untuk membuat sebuah penelitian tentang teknik reflective essay dalam genre teks lain.Kata kunci: Reflective Essay, Teks Recount" @default.
• W156161835 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W156161835 creator A5043063059 @default.
• W156161835 date "2014-01-30" @default.
• W156161835 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W156161835 title "THE USE OF REFLECTIVE ESSAYS IN TEACHING RECOUNT TEXTS" @default.
• W156161835 cites W1493632016 @default.
• W156161835 cites W1508078757 @default.
• W156161835 cites W1529009408 @default.
• W156161835 cites W1534534851 @default.
• W156161835 cites W1558254717 @default.
• W156161835 cites W1564647479 @default.
• W156161835 cites W1573234480 @default.
• W156161835 cites W1593866988 @default.
• W156161835 cites W191344148 @default.
• W156161835 cites W1965040186 @default.
• W156161835 cites W1969341403 @default.
• W156161835 cites W1990785655 @default.
• W156161835 cites W1997744577 @default.
• W156161835 cites W2038713848 @default.
• W156161835 cites W2041333115 @default.
• W156161835 cites W2055751271 @default.
• W156161835 cites W2081367509 @default.
• W156161835 cites W2114005334 @default.
• W156161835 cites W2140927931 @default.
• W156161835 cites W2161733243 @default.
• W156161835 cites W2170644967 @default.
• W156161835 cites W2752877164 @default.
• W156161835 cites W3003709954 @default.
• W156161835 cites W3151773731 @default.
• W156161835 cites W561590756 @default.
• W156161835 cites W588368550 @default.
• W156161835 cites W612452362 @default.
• W156161835 cites W628075579 @default.
• W156161835 cites W632122678 @default.
• W156161835 cites W633200099 @default.
• W156161835 cites W2332163448 @default.
• W156161835 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W156161835 type Work @default.
• W156161835 sameAs 156161835 @default.
• W156161835 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W156161835 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W156161835 hasAuthorship W156161835A5043063059 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C2779207338 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W156161835 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C122980154 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C138885662 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C145420912 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C151730666 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C154945302 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C15744967 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C161191863 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C19417346 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C2775924081 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C2777267654 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C2777855551 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C2779207338 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C41008148 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C41895202 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C47177190 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C77805123 @default.
• W156161835 hasConceptScore W156161835C86803240 @default.
• W156161835 hasLocation W1561618351 @default.
• W156161835 hasOpenAccess W156161835 @default.
• W156161835 hasPrimaryLocation W1561618351 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W1526957400 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W192267547 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2112547996 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2114531133 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2155924493 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2181087728 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2299431469 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2311960234 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2484553815 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2491031306 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2559076909 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2567641254 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2573203832 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2578651326 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2584936710 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2916634239 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2920640583 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2980643055 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W2982849346 @default.
• W156161835 hasRelatedWork W3193675915 @default.

• next