FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1562298830> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1562298830 abstract "Atom lithography is a technique to structure layers of atoms during deposition, using interactions of near-resonant light fields with neutral atoms. The basic scheme uses a standing wave light field, aligned just above a substrate, while a beam of atoms impinges perpendicularly on the standing wave light field. The interaction of the light field and the atoms focuses the atoms towards the crests or troughs of the standing wave intensity, dependent on the tuning of the light field. The focused atoms are subsequently deposited on the substrate, resulting in an array of lines, whose periodicity is determined by the wavelength of the light field. The standing wave light field can therefore be seen as an array of lenses, focusing the atom beam into an array of lines. The first experiments on atom lithography were performed in the 1990s with sodium and chromium. In this thesis experiments with iron are described, which is a magnetic element and thus allows for the creation of magnetic nanostructures. To focus atom beams into structures using atom lithography, well-colimated atom beams are required. The most common technique to create collimated atom beams is transverse laser cooling, but iron has no closed optical transition suitable for laser cooling. Fortunately Smeets and Te Sligte found that even then atom lithography of iron is possible. If the standing wave light field is considered to be an array of lenses, the focusing of the atom beam on a single lens is determined by the local collimation of the atom beam at that position. This local collimation is determined by the geometry of the beam source and the distance of the beam source to the standing wave lens. Using a small beam source (e.g. 1 mm diameter) positioned far from the standing wave (e.g. 1 m), the geometrically collimated atom beam is suitable for atom lithography. Chapter 3 shows what the implications of geometric collimation are on the structure formation in atom lithography. The geometric effects that locally collimate the atom beam on the sample also introduce local offset angles of the atom beam with respect to the focusing light field. Structure formation has been observed with lines of up to 7 nm high on a background layer of 15 nm average height, over areas of up to 400 µm × 6 mm. This indicates that the offset angles can vary over an 8 mrad range, which is more than an order of magnitude larger than the local angle of collimation. The offset angle influence the local geometry of the deposited structures: an increasing offset angle decreases the local line height, increases the width and creates a skewness in the local line shape. The local geometry of the lines has been modelled with a Monte Carlo particle tracking model and the results were compared to experiments. It was found that the highest and narrowest lines suffer from significant broadening due to surface diffusion in experiments, limiting the achievable structure width of iron on SiOx samples to about 80 nm. We have also found that in atom lithography without laser cooling, each standing wave lens is effectively imaging the source geometry onto the substrate. We therefore propose using structured atom beam sources to image more complex patterns on sub-wavelength scales in a parallel way. The reason to use iron in atom lithography, is the option to create magnetic nanostructures. However, in previous experiments no clear magnetic signature of the atom lithographic structuring of iron was found. Therefore in Chapter 4 firstly the magnetic properties of unstructured layers of iron (Fe), nickel (Ni) and FexNi1-x are investigated. These layers are all ferromagnetic, but with a reduced magnetic moment compared to bulk values due to contaminations and crystal growth effects. As a reference for periodic atom lithography structures, periodic line structures are created with interference lithography in a polymer layer and onto these structures thin layers of FexNi1-x are shadow deposited, thereby creating a layer periodically modulated in both height and elemental composition. This periodic modulation in composition has been observed with SEM-EDX on sub-micron scales. The structures showed a clear magnetic anisotropy with an easy axis along the direction of the lines, in accordance with expectations. In Chapter 5, the magnetic properties of atom lithographic iron line structures are presented. Using MOKE microscopy, direct comparison of structured and unstructured parts of a sample is possible, which allows for the observation of clear magnetic signatures due to the atom lithographic structuring. In layers of an average thickness of about 15 nm, no anisotropy is induced by the line structures, while a magnetic easy axis along the direction of the lines is expected. The line structures introduce an isotropic increase in the coercivity of the layers, indicating that the line structures can be considered as isotropic corrugations instead of directional line structures. For layers of 30 nm average thickness and thus higher line structures, a clear magnetic anisotropy is observed for the highest line structures. This anisotropy can be seen as a magnetic easy axis along the direction of the lines, as expected for line structures. However, we also observe a sharp increase in coercivity for applied fields perpendicular to the lines. This phenomenon is intriguing and may be explained by a pinning of head-to-head domain walls along the direction of the lines. In Chapter 5, we also report on the first results of co-deposition of FexNi1-x, where the Fe is structured into lines using atom lithography, while the Ni is deposited uniformly, thereby creating an alloy of modulating composition. Magnetic analysis of these structures indicates that these structures are anisotropic, both the coercivity and the shape of domain walls is dependent on the angle of the applied field relative to the line structures. Finally in Chapter 6, we investigate the possibilities to focus a thermal beam of atoms into a single 100 nm spot using light fields, thereby creating a nanopencil suitable for deposition of nanostructures. A Monte Carlo particle tracking program was developed to model the all optical focusing or funneling of 10 µm sized atom beams to a 100 nm spot. This model included effects of initial beam divergence, magnetic substructure, laser cooling, and spontaneous as well as stimulated diffusion and it was applied to a number of promising light field configurations. The best results obtained for experimentally realistic settings are a beam focused to a full width at half maximum of FWHM = 0.55 µm in a blue detuned hollow beam where atoms are focused towards the dark center, or a FWHM = 0.31 µm in a red detuned axicon light field, where atoms are focused towards the maximum intensity at the heart line. However, in the latter case the focused beam has a flux only 25 times larger than the background flux, which is unpractical for applications. The limiting factors of all schemes are heating due to stimulated diffusion and the limited interaction time available for a thermal beam of atoms. A nanopencil could be possible if it were based on the focussing of a slow and / or monochromatic atom beam, but this would seriously complicate the practical application of such a device." @default.
• W1562298830 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1562298830 creator A5063323602 @default.
• W1562298830 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1562298830 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1562298830 title "Atom lithography:creating patterned magnetic layers" @default.
• W1562298830 doi "https://doi.org/10.6100/ir724588" @default.
• W1562298830 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1562298830 type Work @default.
• W1562298830 sameAs 1562298830 @default.
• W1562298830 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1562298830 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1562298830 hasAuthorship W1562298830A5063323602 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConcept C149635348 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConcept C171250308 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConcept C204223013 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConcept C49040817 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConcept C58312451 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConceptScore W1562298830C149635348 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConceptScore W1562298830C171250308 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConceptScore W1562298830C192562407 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConceptScore W1562298830C204223013 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConceptScore W1562298830C41008148 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConceptScore W1562298830C49040817 @default.
• W1562298830 hasConceptScore W1562298830C58312451 @default.
• W1562298830 hasLocation W15622988301 @default.
• W1562298830 hasOpenAccess W1562298830 @default.
• W1562298830 hasPrimaryLocation W15622988301 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W1972268728 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2008789999 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2037614229 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2057504907 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2069406412 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2079188059 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2082044484 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2161179771 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2292330477 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2330723789 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2746946198 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W3127355123 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W57450113 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W965287180 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W11112316 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W1577054029 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2406416071 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2825233492 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W2848260286 @default.
• W1562298830 hasRelatedWork W74044456 @default.
• W1562298830 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1562298830 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1562298830 magId "1562298830" @default.
• W1562298830 workType "article" @default.