FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1563894162> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1563894162 abstract "Esophagitis caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) results in appreciable morbidity and economic burden. No systematic review has addressed the effectiveness of prokinetic drugs in the treatment of GERD esophagitis in adults.To determine the utility of prokinetic drugs in improving symptoms and endoscopic lesions in patients with GERD esophagitis.We included randomized controlled trials that compared prokinetic drugs with placebo. A systematic search included the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, MEDLINE, CINAHL, LILACS, EMBASE, a manual search of books and article references, and contact with pharmaceutical companies. Reviewers assessed methodological quality and extracted data that were combined using a random effects model.Eighteen articles met the eligibility criteria; of these, 13 used prokinetic drugs alone, 4 tested prokinetic drugs as additional therapy in patients receiving histamine-2 receptor blockers, and 1 tested them in patients receiving proton pump inhibitors. Seven studies evaluated clinical improvement only, 5 addressed endoscopic improvement only, and 6 reported both outcomes. Four studies failed to provide adequate data for pooling; 3 of the 4 reported results that suggested symptomatic benefit with prokinetic agents. Nine studies (379 patients) that provided the required data suggested a higher incidence of clinical improvement with prokinetic drugs versus placebo (relative risk [RR] 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-2.12, heterogeneity p = 0.47, I(2) = 0%). Clinical improvement occurred in 53 out of 175 patients (30%) of the control group; applying the relative risk of 1.70 and associated confidence interval suggests that absolute increases in patients improved might vary from 18% to 41% (number needed to treat approximately 3 to 6). Improvement was similar in 4 studies in which the prokinetic agent was added to an antisecretory drug. The funnel plot, however, suggests the possibility of publication bias. Eleven studies (887 patients) suggested a higher likelihood of endoscopic improvement or healing esophagitis with prokinetic drugs (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.53) but with significant heterogeneity (heterogeneity p = .05, I(2) = 46.2%) that we couldn't explain with an a priori hypothesis. When we evaluated endoscopic healing as the main outcome we observed a trend toward better results in the treatment group, also with inexplicable heterogeneity (RR 1.36, CI 95% 0.97-1.89, I(2) = 61%).Randomized controlled trials provide moderate-quality evidence that prokinetic drugs improve symptoms in patients with reflux esophagitis and low-quality evidence that they have an impact on endoscopic healing." @default.
• W1563894162 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1563894162 creator A5003850783 @default.
• W1563894162 creator A5008689533 @default.
• W1563894162 creator A5031717153 @default.
• W1563894162 creator A5072931178 @default.
• W1563894162 creator A5081494568 @default.
• W1563894162 creator A5084069796 @default.
• W1563894162 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W1563894162 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1563894162 title "Prokinetic drug utility in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux esophagitis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials." @default.
• W1563894162 cites W146528517 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W1514398726 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W156002311 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W1593113551 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W1872444709 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W1935581134 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W1990418353 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W1997088191 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W1998224305 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2001782466 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2002040883 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2025496617 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2029982117 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2033316181 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2056642316 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2057914587 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2079065919 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2085516599 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2099999179 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2102826172 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2105606912 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2105918937 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2107328434 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2149608778 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2414141172 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2415033872 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2417325088 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2426866456 @default.
• W1563894162 cites W2501503073 @default.
• W1563894162 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3113218" @default.
• W1563894162 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21673949" @default.
• W1563894162 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W1563894162 type Work @default.
• W1563894162 sameAs 1563894162 @default.
• W1563894162 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W1563894162 countsByYear W15638941622012 @default.
• W1563894162 countsByYear W15638941622013 @default.
• W1563894162 countsByYear W15638941622014 @default.
• W1563894162 countsByYear W15638941622016 @default.
• W1563894162 countsByYear W15638941622022 @default.
• W1563894162 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1563894162 hasAuthorship W1563894162A5003850783 @default.
• W1563894162 hasAuthorship W1563894162A5008689533 @default.
• W1563894162 hasAuthorship W1563894162A5031717153 @default.
• W1563894162 hasAuthorship W1563894162A5072931178 @default.
• W1563894162 hasAuthorship W1563894162A5081494568 @default.
• W1563894162 hasAuthorship W1563894162A5084069796 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C27081682 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C2777014526 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C2777247143 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C2779920096 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C43270747 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C126322002 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C142724271 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C168563851 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C204787440 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C27081682 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C2777014526 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C2777247143 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C2779134260 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C2779920096 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C43270747 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C44249647 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C71924100 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C82789193 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C90924648 @default.
• W1563894162 hasConceptScore W1563894162C95190672 @default.
• W1563894162 hasLocation W15638941621 @default.
• W1563894162 hasOpenAccess W1563894162 @default.
• W1563894162 hasPrimaryLocation W15638941621 @default.
• W1563894162 hasRelatedWork W1551263586 @default.
• W1563894162 hasRelatedWork W1565457160 @default.
• W1563894162 hasRelatedWork W1865238443 @default.
• W1563894162 hasRelatedWork W1872444709 @default.
• W1563894162 hasRelatedWork W1935581134 @default.
• W1563894162 hasRelatedWork W2047940354 @default.
• W1563894162 hasRelatedWork W2064517524 @default.
• W1563894162 hasRelatedWork W2077836318 @default.
• W1563894162 hasRelatedWork W2082046668 @default.

• next