FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1567150624> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1567150624 startingPage "117" @default.
• W1567150624 abstract "ABSTRACT This study examines the effects of market noise in the ADR market. We find ADR return affected by noise trader risk and increases (decreases) when investors are irrationally optimistic (pessimistic). Our results also suggest institutional investors have engaged in to exploit their information advantage in the noisy ADR market. Through a Granger causality regression, we find the returns on ADR portfolios with high institutional ownership lead the returns of those with low institutional ownership in the low-noise period, confirming that institutional trades reflect market information that is ultimately incorporated into other securities. Finally, we find institutional investors help reduce volatilities of European ADRs. However, for ADRs of Asian and South American firms, magnitude of the stabilizing arbitrage positions taken by rational investors is insignificant. INTRODUCTION Fischer Black (1986) suggests that noise is as influential as information in financial markets. Investors who trade on noise are willing to trade even though it is better for them not to trade. They do so because they think the noise on which they base their is information. From existing literature, we can identify three possible effects of noise on securities trading. First, market noise leads to the existence of noise trader risk. De Long et al. ( 1990) develop a noise trader risk model which argues that when investment decisions are made based on market noise, the decisions are irrational and unpredictable because they are led by investor sentiment in general. Hence, noise traders become a source of risk in the finanical markets. Second, the existence of noise in capital markets provides an opportunity for informed institutional investors to exploit their information advantage. Barclay and Warner (1993) show that informed institutional investors are more likely to engage in stealth trading strategies in which the institutions spread their trades gradually over time. Third, the irrational behavior of noise traders in a noisy market may cause asset prices to move away from their fundamental values and destabilize the market. On the other hand, rational institutional investors would take positions opposite to those of the noise traders and help stabilize the market despite De Long et al. (1990) predict that institutional investors would fail to totally encounter the irrational activities of noise traders. We examine the three possible effects of noise in the ADR market. Our results show that ADR return is affected by investor sentiment in the ADR market. ADR return increases (decreases) when investors are irrationally optimistic (pessimistic). We also find that in the low-noise period, ADRs with high institutional ownership exhibit autocorrelation similar to ADRs with low institutional ownership. However, in the high-noise period, ADRs with high institutional ownership exhibit significant higher autocorrelation than ADRs with low institutional ownership. The result implies institutional investors may have engaged in to expolit a noisy market. Through a Granger causality regression, we find returns on ADR portfolios with high institutional ownership lead the returns of those with low institutional ownership in the low-noise period, confirming that institutional trades reflect market information that is ultimately incorporated into other securities. Finally, we find that institutional investors help reduce volatility of European ADR returns. However, for ADRs of Asian and South American firms, the magnitude of the stabilizing arbitrage positions taken by institutional investors is insignificant. LITERATURE AND MOTIVATION Financial economists have hypothesized the existence of noise in stock markets (for example, Black (1986), Trueman (1988), De Long et al. (1989), (1990), Palomino (1996)). While Black ( 1986) does not give a reason why investors would rationally want to engage in noise trading, he asserts that it must account for an important fraction of total in securities markets. …" @default.
• W1567150624 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1567150624 creator A5042834735 @default.
• W1567150624 creator A5068032911 @default.
• W1567150624 date "2006-09-01" @default.
• W1567150624 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W1567150624 title "Market Noise, Investor Sentiment, and Institutional Investors in the ADR Market" @default.
• W1567150624 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W1567150624 type Work @default.
• W1567150624 sameAs 1567150624 @default.
• W1567150624 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1567150624 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1567150624 hasAuthorship W1567150624A5042834735 @default.
• W1567150624 hasAuthorship W1567150624A5068032911 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C106159729 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C160623529 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C19244329 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C206757995 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C556758197 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConcept C99498987 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C10138342 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C106159729 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C115961682 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C144133560 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C154945302 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C160623529 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C162324750 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C19244329 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C206757995 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C39389867 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C41008148 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C556758197 @default.
• W1567150624 hasConceptScore W1567150624C99498987 @default.
• W1567150624 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1567150624 hasLocation W15671506241 @default.
• W1567150624 hasOpenAccess W1567150624 @default.
• W1567150624 hasPrimaryLocation W15671506241 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W1488329523 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W1500490652 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W1984540882 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W2022317178 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W2116124900 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W2124135196 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W2201762043 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W236574614 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W2366662082 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W2383199741 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W2418608155 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W2946268458 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W2959190800 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W3006078402 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W3121142983 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W3125487061 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W3135959405 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W3143298653 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W3182910209 @default.
• W1567150624 hasRelatedWork W4540399 @default.
• W1567150624 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W1567150624 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1567150624 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1567150624 magId "1567150624" @default.
• W1567150624 workType "article" @default.