FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1567209074> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1567209074 abstract "Feedback is one of the most potent teaching strategies known to produce student learning gains (Hattie, 2009). However, the provision of feedback has been identified as one of the weakest elements of university practices (Graduate Careers Australia, 2012). Although there are many theoretical frameworks for improving feedback provision (Hattie & Timperley, 2007; Nicol & Macfarlane Dick, 2006; Sadler, 2010), little is known about how students actually use feedback (Jonsson, 2013). Many authors contend that students commonly ignore feedback (Boud & Molloy, 2013), with some empirical evidence that students do not collect or read written feedback (Sinclair & Cleland, 2007), or ignore it when they do not understand what it means (Still & Koerber, 2010). The increasingly widespread adoption of online marking and feedback tools facilitates students’ access to their feedback, but until now there has been no systematic characterise the patterns of student access of this feedback, nor how this impacts on their subsequent performance (Ellis, 2013). We have developed, and extensively trialled, a Feedback Analytics Capture System (FACS, previously called UQMarkUP) which synthesises large-scale data on digital feedback provision, how students access feedback, and changes in students’ academic performance (Zimbardi et al., 2013). Specifically, FACS captures detailed information about the audio, typed and hand-drawn annotations markers insert in situ in electronic assessment submissions, and the marks awarded across a variety of systems, including detailed criteria-standards rubrics. FACS also collects detailed information about how students access this feedback, logging the timing and nature of every mouse click a student uses to interact with the feedback-embedded document. In this exploratory study, we investigated the frequency, timing, and patterns in how students access their feedback. Analyses of FACS data from laboratory reports submitted for summative assessment in two biomedical science courses in level 1 (n=1781 students) and level 2 (n=389), in Semesters 1 and 2, 2013, revealed that the vast majority of students opened their feedback. In the level 1 course 93% students opened Report 1, 92% opened Report 2, 87% opened Report 3 and 85% opened Report 4. In contrast, far fewer students in the level 2 course opened their feedback, and fewer students opened Report 1 (68%) than Report 2 (82%). Although a similar pattern existed for how long students had their feedback open (level 1 Report 1: 12±8 hours; Report 2: 3.4±1.6 hours; Report 3: 2.1±1.4 hours; Report 4: 43±7 minutes), the level 2 reports now reverted to greater duration of interaction with Report 1 (5.6±0.6 hours) than Report 2 (1.2±0.3 hours). The number of students accessing feedback surges 1-2 days after feedback release, followed by a persistent tail of students accessing the feedback for the subsequent two months. In this context of undergraduate biomedical science laboratory assessments, students are not only collecting and reading their feedback, but they are interacting with it extensively. There may also be potential maturational, course-specific, and interaction effects that shape feedback use, and require further exploration as we expand this feedback analytics approach across a broader range of educational contexts." @default.
• W1567209074 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1567209074 creator A5002790066 @default.
• W1567209074 creator A5020717538 @default.
• W1567209074 creator A5025551136 @default.
• W1567209074 creator A5032514931 @default.
• W1567209074 creator A5037479629 @default.
• W1567209074 creator A5038820884 @default.
• W1567209074 creator A5050637110 @default.
• W1567209074 creator A5054640526 @default.
• W1567209074 creator A5054975238 @default.
• W1567209074 creator A5071451878 @default.
• W1567209074 date "2014-09-04" @default.
• W1567209074 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1567209074 title "Are students reading my feedback? Using a feedback analytics capture system to understand how large cohorts of biomedical science students use feedback" @default.
• W1567209074 cites W1549788644 @default.
• W1567209074 cites W1988149400 @default.
• W1567209074 cites W1989773760 @default.
• W1567209074 cites W2021305481 @default.
• W1567209074 cites W2116967411 @default.
• W1567209074 cites W2122933407 @default.
• W1567209074 cites W2142995122 @default.
• W1567209074 cites W2560140854 @default.
• W1567209074 cites W2605472241 @default.
• W1567209074 cites W65436070 @default.
• W1567209074 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1567209074 type Work @default.
• W1567209074 sameAs 1567209074 @default.
• W1567209074 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1567209074 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1567209074 hasAuthorship W1567209074A5002790066 @default.
• W1567209074 hasAuthorship W1567209074A5020717538 @default.
• W1567209074 hasAuthorship W1567209074A5025551136 @default.
• W1567209074 hasAuthorship W1567209074A5032514931 @default.
• W1567209074 hasAuthorship W1567209074A5037479629 @default.
• W1567209074 hasAuthorship W1567209074A5038820884 @default.
• W1567209074 hasAuthorship W1567209074A5050637110 @default.
• W1567209074 hasAuthorship W1567209074A5054640526 @default.
• W1567209074 hasAuthorship W1567209074A5054975238 @default.
• W1567209074 hasAuthorship W1567209074A5071451878 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C111640148 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C136197465 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C42058189 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConcept C79158427 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C111640148 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C136197465 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C145420912 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C154945302 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C15744967 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C17744445 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C199539241 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C2522767166 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C41008148 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C42058189 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C554936623 @default.
• W1567209074 hasConceptScore W1567209074C79158427 @default.
• W1567209074 hasLocation W15672090741 @default.
• W1567209074 hasOpenAccess W1567209074 @default.
• W1567209074 hasPrimaryLocation W15672090741 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W121187345 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W1518020754 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W1549689259 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W1553423494 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W1600602565 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W1782309004 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2007072433 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2057454900 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2071784697 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2116631394 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2164082763 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2258968425 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2268155703 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2269739629 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2468721364 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2530679386 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2566208005 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W3022768873 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W647239519 @default.
• W1567209074 hasRelatedWork W2594704871 @default.
• W1567209074 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1567209074 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1567209074 magId "1567209074" @default.
• W1567209074 workType "article" @default.