Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1567492445> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 46 of
46
with 100 items per page.
- W1567492445 endingPage "351" @default.
- W1567492445 startingPage "345" @default.
- W1567492445 abstract "On 1 June 2005 the Dutch rejected the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe in a referendum which asked the voters whether parliament should approve it, yes or no. About 63 per cent of the persons eligible to vote actually cast a vote, and nearly 62 percent of them answered ‘NO’. Yet, the actual meaning of this rejection is in several respects hard to explain. This is so, particularly because of the fact that both the Dutch government and parliament have been massively supporting European integration, while – although the matter was never put to the vote – support in parliament for the draft EU Constitution previous to the referendum was about 85 %. And surprisingly, after a brief moment of confusion, members of parliament were nearly jubilant over the ‘success’ of the referendum. Part of the confusion was the call for a ‘broad social debate on Europe’ – similar to the Irish Forum on Europe organized after the negative in the first Nice referendum – which found huge support in parliament and also with the government. But once it was to be organized, it floundered on unwillingness both of the government and parliament to agree on who should do what and how. So after some three months the nearly unanimous enthusiasm over a national Europe debate, it was called off. In this brief report we try to provide some information on the background of the referendum and its results in an attempt to make sense of this double Dutch." @default.
- W1567492445 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1567492445 creator A5023447034 @default.
- W1567492445 date "2006-09-01" @default.
- W1567492445 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W1567492445 title "Double Dutch: The Referendum on the European Constitution" @default.
- W1567492445 doi "https://doi.org/10.54648/euro2006023" @default.
- W1567492445 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W1567492445 type Work @default.
- W1567492445 sameAs 1567492445 @default.
- W1567492445 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W1567492445 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1567492445 hasAuthorship W1567492445A5023447034 @default.
- W1567492445 hasBestOaLocation W15674924452 @default.
- W1567492445 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1567492445 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1567492445 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W1567492445 hasConcept C2781462389 @default.
- W1567492445 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W1567492445 hasConceptScore W1567492445C17744445 @default.
- W1567492445 hasConceptScore W1567492445C199539241 @default.
- W1567492445 hasConceptScore W1567492445C2776154427 @default.
- W1567492445 hasConceptScore W1567492445C2781462389 @default.
- W1567492445 hasConceptScore W1567492445C94625758 @default.
- W1567492445 hasIssue "Issue 3" @default.
- W1567492445 hasLocation W15674924451 @default.
- W1567492445 hasLocation W15674924452 @default.
- W1567492445 hasOpenAccess W1567492445 @default.
- W1567492445 hasPrimaryLocation W15674924451 @default.
- W1567492445 hasRelatedWork W1546172181 @default.
- W1567492445 hasRelatedWork W1783019634 @default.
- W1567492445 hasRelatedWork W1802331230 @default.
- W1567492445 hasRelatedWork W1978422404 @default.
- W1567492445 hasRelatedWork W3012342330 @default.
- W1567492445 hasRelatedWork W3123633800 @default.
- W1567492445 hasRelatedWork W3207232227 @default.
- W1567492445 hasRelatedWork W4246380667 @default.
- W1567492445 hasRelatedWork W50880763 @default.
- W1567492445 hasRelatedWork W2107881954 @default.
- W1567492445 hasVolume "12" @default.
- W1567492445 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1567492445 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1567492445 magId "1567492445" @default.
- W1567492445 workType "article" @default.