Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1568121568> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1568121568 endingPage "3269" @default.
- W1568121568 startingPage "3253" @default.
- W1568121568 abstract "Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels mediate sound transmission by triggering presynaptic exocytosis of glutamate from cochlear inner hair cells (IHCs). Harmonin is a PDZ-domain-containing protein in IHCs that is altered in Usher syndrome, a form of deaf–blindness in humans. We show that harmonin enhances Cav1.3 voltage-dependent facilitation (VDF) in transfected HEK293T cells in a manner that depends on the identity of the auxiliary Ca2+ channel β subunit. Cav1.3 VDF is impaired, and synchronous exocytosis and the Ca2+ efficiency of exocytosis are reduced, in IHCs from deaf-circler mice expressing a mutant form of harmonin (dfcr) that cannot interact with Cav1.3. We conclude that harmonin regulates presynaptic function in mouse IHCs, which adds to our understanding of the factors that may influence hearing impairment in Usher syndrome. Abstract Cav1.3 channels mediate Ca2+ influx that triggers exocytosis of glutamate at cochlear inner hair cell (IHC) synapses. Harmonin is a PDZ-domain-containing protein that interacts with the C-terminus of the Cav1.3 α1 subunit (α11.3) and controls cell surface Cav1.3 levels by promoting ubiquitin-dependent proteosomal degradation. However, PDZ-domain-containing proteins have diverse functions and regulate other Cav1.3 properties, which could collectively influence presynaptic transmitter release. Here, we report that harmonin binding to the α11.3 distal C-terminus (dCT) enhances voltage-dependent facilitation (VDF) of Cav1.3 currents both in transfected HEK293T cells and in mouse inner hair cells. In HEK293T cells, this effect of harmonin was greater for Cav1.3 channels containing the auxiliary Cavβ1 than with the β2 auxiliary subunit. Cav1.3 channels lacking the α11.3 dCT were insensitive to harmonin modulation. Moreover, the ‘deaf-circler’dfcr mutant form of harmonin, which does not interact with the α11.3 dCT, did not promote VDF. In mature IHCs from mice expressing the dfcr harmonin mutant, Cav1.3 VDF was less than in control IHCs. This difference was not observed between control and dfcr IHCs prior to hearing onset. Membrane capacitance recordings from dfcr IHCs revealed a role for harmonin in synchronous exocytosis and in increasing the efficiency of Ca2+ influx for triggering exocytosis. Collectively, our results indicate a multifaceted presynaptic role of harmonin in IHCs in regulating Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels and exocytosis. Voltage-gated Cav1.3 Ca2+ channels are highly expressed in cochlear inner hair cells (IHCs), where their activity is tightly coupled to the exocytic release from specialized ‘ribbon’ synapses (Platzer et al. 2000; Brandt et al. 2003). Mice lacking Cav1.3 are deaf (Platzer et al. 2000; Dou et al. 2004) as are humans with loss-of-function mutations in the CACNA1D gene encoding the pore-forming Cav1.3 α1 subunit (α11.3) (Baig et al. 2011). Cav1.3 channels are subject to diverse forms of regulation, which can strongly impact neuronal and cardiac signalling (Mangoni et al. 2003; Olson et al. 2005; Hetzenauer et al. 2006; Zhang et al. 2006; Chan et al. 2007; Navedo et al. 2007). Therefore, characterization of the factors that modulate Cav1.3 channels in IHCs is essential for understanding the dynamics of presynaptic Ca2+ signals and sound transmission by IHCs. Like other Cav1 channels, Cav1.3 can interact directly with various proteins (Calin-Jageman & Lee, 2008). The distal C-terminus (dCT) of the Cav1.3 α11.3 contains a consensus site for binding to PDZ (PSD-95 (postsynaptic density-95)/Discs large/ZO-1 (zona occludens-1)) domains (Songyang et al. 1997). Interactions with PDZ-domain-containing proteins affect the localization and function of Cav1.3 in neurons (Olson et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2005, 2006). One such protein, erbin, binds to the α11.3 dCT and potentiates Cav1.3 currents in response to depolarizing stimuli through a process known as voltage-dependent facilitation (VDF; Calin-Jageman et al. 2007). Densin-180 also interacts with the α11.3 dCT but does not enhance Cav1.3 VDF. Rather, densin-180 tethers calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II to the Cav1.3 channel complex, which mediates Ca2+-dependent facilitation of Cav1.3 currents in response to high-frequency repetitive stimuli (Jenkins et al. 2010). Like erbin and densin-180, harmonin is a PDZ-domain-containing protein expressed in the brain, but is additionally localized in IHCs (Verpy et al. 2000; Reiners et al. 2005). The gene encoding harmonin corresponds to the USH1C locus for Usher Type 1 syndrome (Verpy et al. 2000), an autosomal recessive sensory disorder characterized by deafness, vestibular dysfunction, and late-onset retinitis pigmentosa (Kimberling & Moller, 1995). Harmonin is concentrated in the apical hair bundles of cochlear and vestibular hair cells (Adato et al. 2005), where it interacts with multiple proteins and regulates mechanotransduction channels that convert mechanical stimuli into changes in hair cell membrane potential (Grillet et al. 2009; Michalski et al. 2009). In mature IHCs, harmonin is also localized to a subset of ribbon-type active zones. Harmonin binds to the α11.3 dCT, which enhances proteosomal degradation of Cav1.3 and controls Cav1.3 channel density at mouse IHC synapses (Gregory et al. 2011). It is not known whether, like erbin and densin-180, harmonin has other modulatory actions on Cav1.3 that could impact presynaptic function in IHCs. In addition, given the strong localization of harmonin at IHC synapses, harmonin may also play a role in glutamate exocytosis, which has also not been investigated. To address these open questions, we tested if harmonin influenced additional properties of Cav1.3, and probed the impact of harmonin on exocytosis in IHCs. We found that like erbin, harmonin enhances Cav1.3 VDF, which depends on the interaction of harmonin with the α11.3 dCT and the identity of the Cavβ subunit. Moreover, we established that harmonin regulates Cav1.3 VDF and exocytosis in mouse IHCs. Our results highlight new roles for harmonin as a regulator of presynaptic function in IHCs. All procedures involving mice were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Iowa in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines and animal welfare guidelines at the University of Göttingen and the State of Lower Saxony. After mice were killed by decapitation (for mice less than 10 days old) or isoflurane overdose and/or decapitation (for mice greater than 10 days old), the skull was opened, and the cochlea was removed and opened at the apex so that the apical coil could be harvested for electrophysiological experiments. The following Cav subunit cDNAs were used: α11.3 containing exon 42 (GenBank no. AF370009 and AF370010 for additional sequence encoded by exon 42), β1b (GenBank no. NM017346), α11.2 (GenBank no. M67515), β2A (GenBank no. NM053851), and α2δ-1 (GenBank no. M21948). Expression constructs for FLAG-tagged α11.3, α11.3L-A, α11.3exon42A, and green fluorescent protein (GFP)- and myc-tagged harmonin, dfcr mutant were previously described (Calin-Jageman et al. 2007; Gregory et al. 2011). Human embryonic kidney cells transformed with SV40 T-antigen (HEK293T) were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere under 5% CO2. Cells were grown to ∼60–90% confluence in 100 mm plates and transfected using GenePorter Reagent (Gene Therapy Systems, San Diego, CA, USA). For immunoprecipitation experiments, HEK293T cells were transfected with cDNAs encoding Cav1.3 (FLAG-α11.3, FLAG-α11.3exon42A, or FLAG-α11.3L-A (6 μg), β1b and α2δ (2 μg each)) and myc-harmonin (4 μg). For electrophysiological experiments, cells were plated on 35 mm culture dishes and transiently transfected using Fugene transfection reagent (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA). A total of ∼3 μg total DNA was transfected: α11.3, 1.5 μg; β, 0.8 μg; α2δ, 0.8 μg; ±GFP-tagged harmonin or dfcr mutant, 0.5 μg; or GFP expression plasmid, 0.01 μg. HEK293T cells were harvested and lysed 48 h after transfection. Lysates were incubated with ANTI-FLAG M2-Agarose Affinity Gel (all reagents from FLAG Immunoprecipitation Kit, Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) for 2.5 h, rotating at 4°C. After three washes with wash buffer (provided in the FLAG Immunoprecipitation Kit), proteins were eluted with SDS-containing sample buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE. Coimmunoprecipitated proteins were detected by Western blotting with antibodies against α11.3 (Ab144; Gregory et al. 2011) or myc epitopes (Sigma-Aldrich). Following incubation with appropriate secondary antibodies, WesternC reagent (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was utilized for development and the Geldoc Imager for image collection (Bio-rad). Quantification was performed densitometrically with Quantity One software (Bio-rad). To obtain the fraction of harmonin that coimmunoprecipited with α11.3, Western blot signals corresponding to bands for harmonin were divided by those representing the FLAG-immunoprecipitated α11.3. For each experiment, these values for harmonin coimmunoprecipitated with α11.3ex42A or α11.3L-A were normalized to that for α11.3 to determine the percentage change in harmonin that coimmunoprecipitated with α11.3ex42A or α11.3L-A relative to that for α11.3. Data from three independent experiments were averaged (mean ± SEM). Ba2+ currents (IBa) were recorded 48–72 h after transfection at room temperature using the whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology technique from transiently transfected HEK293T cells. The internal solution contained (in mm): 140 NMDG, 5 EGTA, 10 Hepes, 2 MgCl2, 2 Mg-ATP, pH 7.3 (with methanesulfonate) and adjusted to ∼290 mosmol l−1 with glucose. The external solution contained (in mm): 150 Tris, 2 MgCl2, 10 BaCl2, pH 7.35 (with methanesulfonate) and adjusted to ∼310 mosmol l−1 with glucose. Pipettes of 3–5 MΩ resistance were used. Voltage clamp recordings were performed with an EPC-9 or EPC-10 amplifier under control of PULSE or Patchmaster software (HEKA Elektronik, Lambrecht, Germany). Currents were filtered at 2 kHz and sampled at 10–20 kHz. A P/4 protocol was used to subtract leak currents. For whole-cell patch clamp recordings of mouse IHCs, cochlear tissue was dissected from mice (postnatal days (p) 6–8 or p16–18) in Minimum Essential Medium (MEM)/Glutamax-1 (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10 mm Hepes at room temperature and kept up to 18 h at 37°C prior to recording. IHCs in the apical cochlear turn were visualized on an upright microscope (BX51WI, Olympus) with a ×40 water-immersion objective with DIC optics. The basolateral membrane of IHCs was patch-clamped with electrodes pulled from thick-walled borosilicate glass capillaries (1B150F, Warner Instruments, Camden, CT, USA). The internal solution contained (in mm): 120 caesium gluconate, 80 CsCl, 0.1 CaCl2, 4 MgATP, 5 Hepes and 5 EGTA; pH was adjusted to 7.35 with CsOH; osmolarity ∼305 mosmol l−1. External solution contained (in mm): 105 NaCl, 5.8 KCl, 10 CsCl, 55 TEA-Cl, 10 BaCl2, 1 MgCl, 10 glucose and 10 Hepes supplemented with MEM Vitamins and Amino Acids (Invitrogen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) at 1X; pH was adjusted to 7.4 with TEA-OH; osmolarity ∼320 mosmol l−1. On the day of recording, 4-aminopyridine (4 mm), apamin (0.3 mm) and TTX (0.5 mm, for p6–8 IHCs) were added to the external solution. Electrode resistances were 3.5–6.2 MΩ in the external solution. Data were acquired with HEKA EPC-9 or EPC-10 amplifiers controlled by Patchmaster software (HEKA Elektronik, Lambrecht, Germany). Leak subtraction was done online with a P/6 protocol. Series resistance was compensated with the patch clamp circuitry (50–70%); average uncompensated series resistance was 12.9 ± 0.6 (n= 89 IHCs). Currents were low-pass filtered at 5 kHz and sampled at 20 kHz except for VDF measurements, where currents were filtered at 2.9 kHz and sampled at 10 kHz. Voltages were not corrected for the liquid junction potential of −7 mV in the external recording solution. Electrophysiological data were analysed with custom routines in IgorPro software (Wavemetrics, Portland, OR, USA). Average data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were done using SigmaPlot software (Systat, Chicago, IL, USA). Confocal Ca2+ imaging was performed in IHCs from dfcr mice and their wild-type littermates as described previously (Frank et al. 2009; Gregory et al. 2011). In brief, synaptic Ca2+ microdomains were identified as hotspots of Fluo-5N fluorescence (low affinity Ca2+ indicator) in XY scans using long (200–254 ms) step depolarizations. We then positioned the laser at the peak pixel of each Ca2+ microdomain as identified in the XY scan (spot detection) and invoked Ca2+ influx by 20 ms step depolarizations to −32 mV. We then applied a 50 ms depolarization to +63 mV preceding the second 20 ms depolarization to −32 mV in order to facilitate the Ca2+ influx. The internal solution contained (in mm): 115 caesium glutamate, 13 TEA-Cl, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, 10 EGTA, 2 ATP-Mg, 0.3 GTP-Na, 20 Hepes (pH adjusted with CsOH to 7.2, osmolarity ∼295 mosmol l−1) and 0.4 Fluo-5N (penta-potassium salt; Invitrogen). The external solution contained (in mm): 102 NaCl, 35 TEA-Cl, 2.8 KCl, 5 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 Hepes, 1 CsCl, 11.1 d-glucose (pH adjusted with NaOH to 7.2, osmolarity ∼300 mosmol l−1). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, unless otherwise stated. For capacitance recordings, IHCs from dfcr mice and their wild-type littermates (p13–19) were subjected to perforated and ruptured patch-clamp recording as described previously (Moser & Beutner, 2000). The internal solution for perforated-patch experiments contained (in mm): 130 caesium gluconate, 10 TEA-Cl, 10 4-aminopyridine, 1 MgCl2, 10 Hepes (pH adjusted with HCl to 7.17, osmolarity ∼290 mosmol l−1) and 300 μg ml−1 amphotericin B. The internal solution for EGTA experiments contained (in mm): 115 caesium glutamate, 13 TEA-Cl, 1 MgCl2, 4 EGTA, 2 CaCl2, 20 Hepes, 2 Mg-ATP, 0.3 Na-GTP (pH adjusted with CsOH to 7.2, osmolarity ∼290 mosmol l−1). The external solution contained (in mm): 100–104 NaCl, 35 TEA-Cl, 2.8 KCl, 10 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 Hepes, 1 caesium gluconate or CsCl, 5 4-aminopyridine, 11.1 d-glucose (pH adjusted with NaOH to 7.2, osmolarity ∼300 mosmol l−1). For most perforated-patch experiments the external solution also contained apamin (0.1 mm). An EPC-9 amplifier controlled by Pulse software (HEKA Elektronik) was used for measurements. All voltages were corrected for liquid junction potentials. Currents were sampled at 20 kHz and low-pass filtered at 2 kHz. Cells that displayed a holding current exceeding −50 pA were discarded from analysis. Ca2+ currents were further isolated using a P/n protocol. Series resistance (RS) measured at the beginning of the perforated- patch recording was 26.3 ± 1.5 MΩ, n= 15, for control, and 26.9 ± 1.0 MΩ, n= 26, for dfcr. For ruptured-patch recordings, RS was 8.5 ± 0.5 MΩ, n= 10, for control, and 10.4 ± 1.3 MΩ, n= 10, for dfcr. To calculate ΔCm, the initial 30 ms following the voltage step were ignored due to a non-exocytic capacitance artifact (Neef et al. 2007) and the average Cm measured over at least 40 ms. No RS compensation was used. Double-labelling for CtBP2/RIBEYE and GluA2/3 was performed as previously described (Khimich et al. 2005). The following antibodies were used: mouse IgG1 anti-CtBP2 (BD Biosciences, 1:200), rabbit anti-GluR2/3 (Chemicon, 1:200) and secondary AlexaFluor488- and AlexaFluor568-labelled antibodies (Molecular Probes, 1:200). Confocal images were acquired using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP5, Leica MicrosystemsCMS GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) with 488 nm (Ar) and 561 nm (DPSS) lasers for excitation and a ×63 oil immersion objective (NA = 1.4–0.7). For 3-D reconstructions of the specimen, z-axis stacks of 2-D images were taken with a step size of 0.5 μm. Image stacks represent maximum z projections, done in ImageJ. The CtBP-2/RIBEYE and GluA2/3 immunofluorescence spots were counted in the z-stacks and divided by the number of IHCs (number of nuclei in the field of view) in order to yield the number of synapses per IHC. Juxtaposed pre- and postsynaptic spots were considered as mature synapses (Khimich et al. 2005). We have previously shown that cotransfection of harmonin with Cav1.3 channels in HEK293T cells increases ubiquitination of α11.3 and decreases Cav1.3 current density through enhanced proteosomal degradation of α11.3 (Gregory et al. 2011). While determining if harmonin affected other parameters of Cav1.3 function, we noted that harmonin had a particularly prominent effect of enhancing VDF in HEK293T cells. We measured VDF with a triple-pulse voltage protocol in which test current amplitudes are compared before (P1) and after (P2) a conditioning prepulse to various voltages (Fig. 1A). Ba2+ was used as the charge carrier to increase resolution of VDF by limiting the competing effects of Ca2+-dependent inactivation (CDI). With this protocol, VDF is evident as an increase in the ratio of the P2:P1 current (Fratio) with depolarized prepulse voltages. Cotransfection of harmonin with Cav1.3 (α11.3, β1b and α2δ subunits) caused a significant increase in maximal VDF seen with a +50 mV prepulse (Fratio,+50= 1.18 ± 0.02 for Cav1.3 alone vs. 1.52 ± 0.08 for Cav1.3 + harmonin; P < 0.01, by Mann–Whitney rank sum test; Fig. 1B). Increased magnitude of IBa with harmonin was not secondary to shifts in the conductance–voltage profile, since Boltzmann fits of tail current activation curves revealed similar parameters (V1/2=−19.6 ± 3.0; k= 7.9 ± 0.8 for Cav1.3 alone vs. V1/2=−18.6 ± 7.5; k= 7.6 ± 1.1 for Cav1.3 + harmonin, P= 0.98 for V1/2 and P= 0.52 for k; Fig. 1C). These results confirm that harmonin increases Cav1.3 VDF, which is consistent with its interaction with Cav1.3 channels in the plasma membrane. Harmonin enhances VDF of Cav1.3 channels in transfected HEK293T cells A, voltage protocol for VDF (top) and representative traces showing IBa evoked by 10 ms steps from −90 to −20 mV before (P1) and after (P2) a 20 ms conditioning prepulse (Pre) to +50 mV. B, ratio of P2/P1 current amplitudes (Fratio) is plotted against prepulse voltage for Cav1.3 alone (α11.3, β1b, α2δ; n= 12) or +harmonin (n= 12). C, normalized tail current–voltage relationships obtained for Cav1.3 alone (n= 14) or +harmonin (n= 10). IBa was evoked by test pulses from −90 mV to various voltages. Tail currents measured upon repolarization to −70 mV were normalized to the maximal tail current amplitude and plotted against test voltage. Although we found that harmonin modulated the VDF of Cav1.3 channels containing the auxiliary Cavβ1b subunit (Cav1.3(β1b), Fig. 1), Cavβ2 is the major Cavβ subunit contributing to Cav1.3 function in mouse IHCs (Neef et al. 2009). Therefore, we characterized the impact of harmonin on VDF in HEK293T cells transfected with Cav1.3 subunits containing Cavβ2A (Cav1.3(β2A)). While Cav1.3(β2A) exhibited marginal VDF (Fratio,+50= 1.17 ± 0.02) that was not significantly different from Cav1.3(β1b) (Fratio,+50= 1.18 ± 0.02; P= 0.22, by t test; Fig. 2A–C), cotransfection with harmonin caused a smaller increase in VDF of Cav1.3(β2A) than Cav1.3(β1b). While Cav1.3(β1b) VDF was increased 28.5 ± 7.2% by harmonin, this increase was only 10.6 ± 1.6% for Cav1.3(β2A) (P < 0.05, by t test; Fig. 2D). These results confirm the importance of Cavβ subunits in modulating responsiveness of Cav1.3 VDF to PDZ-domain-containing proteins (Calin-Jageman et al. 2007), and suggest that native Cav1.3(β2) in IHCs may undergo VDF enhancement by harmonin, although to a lesser extent than Cav1.3(β1b). The extent of Cav1.3 VDF due to harmonin depends on the identity of the Cavβ subunit A and B, voltage protocol, representative IBa, and Fratio were as described in Fig. 1A and B except for channels containing the Cavβ2A subunit. n= 12 cells for Cav1.3(β2A) alone, n= 12 cells for +harmonin. C, comparison of facilitation obtained at +50 mV prepulse voltage (Fratio,+50) for β1b- or β2A-containing channels. *P < 0.001 compared to Cav1.3 alone, by t test. Number of cells is indicated in parentheses. D, percentage increase in Fratio,+50 due to harmonin (%Fharmonin) for channels with β1b (n= 12 cells) or β2A (n= 12 cells). %Fharmonin was calculated as (Fratio,+50 for Cav1.3 alone/mean Fratio,+50 for +harmonin) × 100. *P < 0.05 by t test. To test if increased VDF was due to harmonin binding to the α11.3 dCT, we took advantage of a short splice variant of the rat α11.3 lacking the dCT in which substitution of exon 42A for exon 42 eliminates much of the C-terminal domain including the PDZ-binding sequence in the dCT (Xu & Lipscombe, 2001). We also used α11.3 constructs in which the final leucine residue in the dCT was mutated to alanine (Cav1.3L-A; Fig. 3A). This mutation disrupts the consensus PDZ-binding sequence and prevents binding of harmonin to a C-terminal fragment of α11.3 in vitro (Gregory et al. 2011). To verify that Cav1.342A and Cav1.3L-A have limited interaction with harmonin, we compared their abilities to coimmunoprecipitate with harmonin with that of the wild-type Cav1.3 in transfected HEK293T cells. While harmonin still coimmunoprecipitated with both Cav1.342A and Cav1.3L-A, quantitative analyses revealed a consistent reduction in the amount of harmonin that associated with Cav1.342A and Cav1.3L-A (66.5 ± 8.8% and 82.1 ± 3.9%, respectively) compared to wild-type Cav1.3 (Fig. 3B and C). Evidently, the dCT contributes to, but is not the sole determinant for, harmonin binding to Cav1.3. Yet, electrophysiological recordings revealed that Cav1.342A and Cav1.3L-A underwent VDF that was not changed by cotransfection with harmonin. As we have shown previously, Cav1.342A VDF was greater than for exon 42-containing channels, since the dCT contains a module that normally inhibits VDF (Calin-Jageman et al. 2007). However, there was no difference in maximal VDF in cells transfected with Cav1.342A alone (Fratio,+50= 1.37 ± 0.06) and those cotransfected with harmonin (Fratio,+50= 1.44 ± 0.08; P= 0.48, by t test; Fig. 4A). Similarly, harmonin did not affect VDF of Cav1.3L-A (Fratio,+50= 1.14 ± 0.03 for Cav1.3L-A alone vs. 1.18 ± 0.04 for Cav1.3L-A+ harmonin, P= 0.75, by t test; Fig. 4B). These results demonstrate that, despite other potential harmonin interaction sites within the Cav1.3 channel complex, harmonin binding to the dCT is required for VDF modulation. Harmonin binding is reduced by disruption of the PDZ-binding site in the α11.3 dCT A, schematic diagram of harmonin and α11.3. The long C-terminal domain encoded by exon 42 (Ex42) includes the PDZ-binding motif (ITTL) that interacts with the second of three PDZ domains of harmonin. The coiled-coil domain (CC) that is deleted in the dfcr harmonin mutant is indicated. The ‘x’ marks approximate location of truncation of the dCT due to inclusion of exon 42A. B, coimmunoprecipitation of harmonin with Cav1.3 channels in transfected HEK293T cells. Cells were transfected with harmonin alone (control) or cotransfected with Cav1.3 subunits including α11.3 with full-length (Ex42) or truncated (Ex42A) dCT or α11.3 with terminal leucine substituted with alanine (L-A). Western blotting detected α11.3 (upper panel) and coimmunoprecipitated harmonin (lower panel). C, quantification reflecting percentage change in harmonin coimmunoprecipitated with α11.3Ex42A and α11.3L-A compared to that for α11.3Ex42 (%co-ip harmonin). See Methods for details. Disruption of the PDZ-binding site in α11.3 prevents modulation of VDF by harmonin Same as in Fig. 1A and B except for cells transfected with Cav1.342A alone (n= 10) or +harmonin (n= 6) (A), or Cav1.3L-A alone (n= 12) or +harmonin (n= 9) (B). ‘Deaf-circler’ (dfcr) mice harbour a mutation in the gene encoding harmonin which deletes 132 amino acids between PDZ domains 2 and 3. Similar to humans with Usher syndrome, dfcr mice are deaf and exhibit vestibular defects (Johnson et al. 2003). The dfcr mutant form of harmonin still contains the PDZ domain 2, which interacts with the α11.3 dCT, but the internal deletion removes the coiled-coil domain, which disrupts binding of PDZ ligands, including α11.3 (Gregory et al. 2011). The dfcr mutant does not bind to the α11.3 dCT in vitro and cannot modulate Cav1.3 current density like the wild-type harmonin in transfected cells and in mouse IHCs (Gregory et al. 2011). Since the effects of the dfcr mutant on Cav1.3 VDF have not been characterized, we first compared the effects of co-transfecting wild-type or dfcr harmonin with Cav1.3 in HEK293T cells. Consistent with the importance of harmonin interactions with the α11.3 dCT for modulation of Cav1.3 VDF (Figs 1–4), dfcr harmonin did not augment VDF of Cav1.3(β2A) (Fratio,+50= 1.15 ± 0.02 for Cav1.3(β2A) alone vs. 1.14 ± 0.02 for Cav1.3(β2A) +dfcr; P= 0.99, by t test; Fig. 5A) or Cav1.3(β1b) (Fratio,+50= 1.21 ± 0.02 for Cav1.3(β1b) alone vs. 1.27 ± 0.04 for Cav1.3(β1b) +dfcr; P= 0.18, by t test; data not shown). To compare a second metric for VDF, we measured the activation kinetics of IBa evoked before and after the conditioning prepulse. Since VDF involves enhanced channel opening in response to depolarization, VDF should manifest as faster activation of the P2 current relative to the P1. To test this, we obtained the time constants (τ) for activation with exponential fits of IBa for P1 and P2, such that enhanced VDF due to harmonin should be measurable as a larger difference in τ for P1 and P2 compared to the dfcr mutant (Δτ, Fig. 5B). While P2 currents activated significantly faster (∼36%) than P1 currents in cells cotransfected with harmonin, no such difference was observed with the dfcr mutant (Fig. 5B). VDF by this metric was significantly greater in cells cotransfected with harmonin than with dfcr mutant (∼70%; Fig. 5B), which further confirms the reduced ability of the dfcr mutant to modulate Cav1.3. The dfcr mutant of harmonin does not enhance Cav1.3 VDF A, same as in Fig. 1A and B except for cells transfected with Cav1.3(β2A) alone (n= 12) or +dfcr (n= 5). Dashed line in graph represents data redrawn from Fig. 2B for Cav1.3(β2A) + harmonin. B: top, representative current traces for P1 and P2 overlaid for comparison; bottom, time constants measured from exponential fits of P1 or P2 current traces for Cav1.3(β2A) + harmonin or Cav1.3(β2A) +dfcr. Δτ represents difference in τ for P1 and P2 currents. P values for τ were determined by t test and for Δτ from paired t test. To determine if harmonin regulates other Cav1.3 properties in transfected HEK293T cells, we measured the effects of harmonin on inactivation. Like other Cav channels, Cav1.3 undergoes inactivation due to Ca2+- or voltage-dependent mechanisms (CDI or VDI, respectively). CDI is due to calmodulin, which senses local Ca2+ influx due to its direct association with the channel (reviewed in Christel & Lee, 2012). Since Ba2+ ions bind poorly to calmodulin (Wang, 1985), IBa exhibits primarily VDI. Depending on the identity of the auxiliary β subunit, ICa can show both CDI and VDI such that CDI can be isolated as the difference in inactivation of ICa and IBa. With 300 ms step-depolarizations, we measured inactivation as the ratio of the residual current amplitude at the end of the pulse (Ires) and the peak current (Ipk) amplitude (Ires/Ipk), and CDI as the difference in Ires/Ipk for ICa and IBa (Fig. 6A). As expected, ICa inactivated significantly faster than IBa in cells transfected with Cav1.3 alone or cotransfected with harmonin or the dfcr mutant. However, there was no difference in CDI between the three groups (Fig. 6A). Since our metric for CDI may not have detected effects of harmonin or dfcr on the kinetics of CDI, we compared parameters from double exponential fits of the ICa. There was no significant difference in the fractional contribution or time constants for fast or slow inactivation (Fig. 6B). These results indicate that harmonin does not affect CDI in transfected HEK293T cells. Cav1.3 CDI is not affected by harmonin or the dfcr mutant A, top, representative traces for ICa and IBa normalized and overlaid for comparison in cells transfected with Cav1.3(β2A) alone or cotransfected with harmonin or dfcr. Currents were evoked by 300 ms pulses to −20 mV from −90 mV. Bottom, inactivation was calculated as the current amplitude at the end of the pulse normalized to the peak current amplitude (Ires/Ipk) and is shown for ICa and IBa. CDI represents the difference in Ires/Ipk for ICa and the mean Ires/Ipk for IBa. For Cav1.3(β2A) alone, n= 5 for ICa, n= 10 for IBa; for +harmonin, n= 7 for ICa, n= 11 for IBa; for +dfcr, n= 9 for ICa, n= 9 for IBa. *P < 0.001 by t test. B, parameters obtained from double exponential fits of current traces obtained as in A. To test the physiological relevance of Cav1.3 VDF modulation by harmonin, we performed whole-cell patch clamp recordings of IHCs from mice expressing the dfcr mutant. We showed previously that Cav1.3 current density is abnormally elevated in IHCs from mature dfcr mice, consistent with decreased proteosomal degradation of Cav1.3 (Gregory et al. 2011). If harmonin also enhances VDF of Cav1.3, we would expect VDF to be reduced in IHCs from dfcr mice. Since the presynaptic localization of harmonin and functional interactions of harmonin with Cav1.3 are characteristic of IHCs from mice at ages (older than p12) after hearing onset (Gregory et al. 2011), modulation of Cav1.3 VDF would be expected in mouse IHCs at p16–18 but not p6–8. To test these predictions, we compared Cav1.3 VDF in IHCs from heterozygous control and homozygous mutant dfcr mice. Since Cav1.3 accounts for ∼90% of the IHC whole-cell Ca2+ current (Platzer et al. 2000; Brandt et al. 2003), recording solutions were designed to isolate Cav1.3 IBa from other ionic currents without the addition of Cav channel blockers. To determine the optimal conditi" @default.
- W1568121568 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1568121568 creator A5016791466 @default.
- W1568121568 creator A5063731202 @default.
- W1568121568 creator A5070796721 @default.
- W1568121568 creator A5073126046 @default.
- W1568121568 creator A5075481670 @default.
- W1568121568 date "2013-05-29" @default.
- W1568121568 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W1568121568 title "Harmonin enhances voltage-dependent facilitation of Ca<sub>v</sub>1.3 channels and synchronous exocytosis in mouse inner hair cells" @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1506027146 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1510439895 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1535462101 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1868187718 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1963580947 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1968669554 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1977244180 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1977604087 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1978279909 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1980430647 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1981683941 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1987523411 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1988594478 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1996601784 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W1999718939 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2001751033 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2006623752 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2019714544 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2022104262 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2025841456 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2029706895 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2033402328 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2034263106 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2038283307 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2043559472 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2048176376 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2048822395 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2057934269 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2062509317 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2065008766 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2068184290 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2074102566 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2074378742 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2078470782 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2084462450 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2084528861 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2091542982 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2092211254 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2092786444 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2100426222 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2104784898 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2108187583 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2117451062 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2118096540 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2124030990 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2130506593 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2142974754 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2144259858 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2150741372 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2151604976 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2154900485 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2155756146 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2159013601 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W2216375055 @default.
- W1568121568 cites W4296928814 @default.
- W1568121568 doi "https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2013.254367" @default.
- W1568121568 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3717226" @default.
- W1568121568 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23613530" @default.
- W1568121568 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W1568121568 type Work @default.
- W1568121568 sameAs 1568121568 @default.
- W1568121568 citedByCount "36" @default.
- W1568121568 countsByYear W15681215682013 @default.
- W1568121568 countsByYear W15681215682014 @default.
- W1568121568 countsByYear W15681215682015 @default.
- W1568121568 countsByYear W15681215682016 @default.
- W1568121568 countsByYear W15681215682017 @default.
- W1568121568 countsByYear W15681215682018 @default.
- W1568121568 countsByYear W15681215682019 @default.
- W1568121568 countsByYear W15681215682020 @default.
- W1568121568 countsByYear W15681215682021 @default.
- W1568121568 countsByYear W15681215682022 @default.
- W1568121568 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1568121568 hasAuthorship W1568121568A5016791466 @default.
- W1568121568 hasAuthorship W1568121568A5063731202 @default.
- W1568121568 hasAuthorship W1568121568A5070796721 @default.
- W1568121568 hasAuthorship W1568121568A5073126046 @default.
- W1568121568 hasAuthorship W1568121568A5075481670 @default.
- W1568121568 hasBestOaLocation W15681215682 @default.
- W1568121568 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W1568121568 hasConcept C12554922 @default.
- W1568121568 hasConcept C1337776 @default.
- W1568121568 hasConcept C165801399 @default.
- W1568121568 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
- W1568121568 hasConcept C175969161 @default.
- W1568121568 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W1568121568 hasConcept C41625074 @default.
- W1568121568 hasConcept C55493867 @default.