FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1569097869> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1569097869 abstract "BACKGROUND: Studies in sheep showed that there is a pre-labour rise in oestrogen and a decrease in progesterone, both of these changes stimulate prostaglandin production and may help initiate labour. Though oestrogen has been suggested as an effective cervical ripening or induction agent, research in humans have failed to demonstrate a similar physiological mechanism. The use of oestrogen as an induction agent is not currently common practice, as such this systematic review should be regarded as an historical review. This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using a standardised methodology. OBJECTIVES: To determine, from the best available evidence, the effectiveness and safety of oestrogens alone or with amniotomy for third trimester cervical ripening and induction of labour in comparison with other methods of induction of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and bibliographies of relevant papers. Last searched: April 2001. SELECTION CRITERIA: (1) randomised controlled trials comparing oestrogens alone used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment or other methods listed above it on a predefined list of labour induction methods; (2) random allocation to the treatment or control group; (3) adequate allocation concealment; (4) violations of allocated management not sufficient to materially affect conclusions; (5) clinically meaningful outcome measures reported; (6) data available for analysis according to the random allocation; (7) missing data insufficient to materially affect the conclusions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A generic strategy has been developed to deal with the large volume and complexity of trial data relating to labour induction. This involved a two-stage method of data extraction. The initial data extraction was done centrally. MAIN RESULTS: When comparing oestrogen with placebo there was no difference between the rate of caesarean section (7.1% versus 10.3%, relative risk (RR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30,1.62). There were no differences between rates of uterine hyperstimulation with or without fetal heart rate changes or instrumental vaginal delivery. None of the studies reported the rates of either vaginal delivery not achieved in 24 hours, or cervix unfavourable/unchanged after 12-24 hours. There were insufficient data to make any meaningful conclusions when comparing oestrogen with vaginal PGE2, intracervical PGE2, oxytocin alone or extra amniotic PGF2a, as to whether oestrogen is effective in inducing labour. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There were insufficient data to draw any conclusions regarding the efficacy of oestrogen as an induction agent." @default.
• W1569097869 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1569097869 creator A5027049074 @default.
• W1569097869 creator A5059097912 @default.
• W1569097869 creator A5082999744 @default.
• W1569097869 date "2001-10-23" @default.
• W1569097869 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W1569097869 title "Oestrogens alone or with amniotomy for cervical ripening or induction of labour" @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1485840449 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1502486332 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1509532407 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1511151397 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1512871600 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1516175106 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1526366495 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1569097869 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1582970318 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1598602811 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1604222318 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1617474992 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1629642007 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1734845440 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1920137088 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1974072209 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1981378064 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1982811537 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1984194797 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W1996274669 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2015637469 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2023894140 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2025127199 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2025510211 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2042421846 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2076097784 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2077178347 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2077741518 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2101466491 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2113529708 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2127557619 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2145724799 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2149351849 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2162844483 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W2168277600 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W3127784743 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W4211014140 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W4211057123 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W4230615261 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W4237896717 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W4239106624 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W4239650027 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W4240962633 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W4246262855 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W4246465291 @default.
• W1569097869 cites W4248877448 @default.
• W1569097869 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003393" @default.
• W1569097869 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/6991160" @default.
• W1569097869 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11687200" @default.
• W1569097869 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W1569097869 type Work @default.
• W1569097869 sameAs 1569097869 @default.
• W1569097869 citedByCount "44" @default.
• W1569097869 countsByYear W15690978692012 @default.
• W1569097869 countsByYear W15690978692013 @default.
• W1569097869 countsByYear W15690978692014 @default.
• W1569097869 countsByYear W15690978692016 @default.
• W1569097869 countsByYear W15690978692017 @default.
• W1569097869 countsByYear W15690978692018 @default.
• W1569097869 countsByYear W15690978692019 @default.
• W1569097869 countsByYear W15690978692020 @default.
• W1569097869 countsByYear W15690978692021 @default.
• W1569097869 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1569097869 hasAuthorship W1569097869A5027049074 @default.
• W1569097869 hasAuthorship W1569097869A5059097912 @default.
• W1569097869 hasAuthorship W1569097869A5082999744 @default.
• W1569097869 hasBestOaLocation W15690978692 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C172353545 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C2776176026 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C2780802667 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C3017551526 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C126322002 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C131872663 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C172353545 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C185592680 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C2776176026 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C2779234561 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C2780802667 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C3017551526 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C31903555 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C54355233 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C71924100 @default.
• W1569097869 hasConceptScore W1569097869C86803240 @default.
• W1569097869 hasLocation W15690978691 @default.

• next