FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1569205221> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1569205221 abstract "Fisheries policy in the eleventh plan aims at sustainable economic growth, with due concerns on food and nutritional security and supply side responses. The plan accords overarching priorities on bridging the sharpening divides and increasing disparities in all sectors. The socio- economic framework of the fishing community with structural changes in coastal sector needs successful design and implementation of development programs. This article highlights the sectoral growth of fishing units and their capital investment over the years, change in ownership pattern of means of production, earnings, sectoral disparity, and inequity among marine fisher folk in India. Base material for the analysis includes primary data collected from selected centers of maritime states in India and secondary data on marine fisheries census of CMFRI and other relevant publications. There has been sizeable growth of 70% in the mechanized fishing units and about 200% growth in motorized sector that are technically efficient (over the last 12 years until 2005). However, there has been a downtrend of 43% in the nonmechanized units (traditional sector) denoting a gradual phasing out of less efficient units. The improved socio-economic status of fishers is reflected by increase in literacy level, reduction in dropouts, and improvement in housing type. The proportion of owner operators in marine fisheries declined over the years with the increasing capital requirement for possessing motorized and mechanized fishing units. The fishermen involved in active fishing is more than the absorbing capacity of the fisheries sector leading to disguised unemployment and has led to lower per capita production, increased pressure on fishing, which results in juvenile catch, large level discards, and thus ultimately causing serious threats to resource sustainability and environmental stability. The nonmechanized sector is providing about 33% of the employment in active fishing, yet harvesting hardly 7% of the annual landings, whereas mechanized segment that employs 34% harvests 70% of total catch creating wide inter-sectoral income disparity. The annual per capita catch of fisher folk in mechanized segment is more than twice as those of the per capita catch of the motorized segment and nine times of the per capita catch of the nonmechanized (traditional sector) segment clearly signifying growing inter-sectoral disparity in distribution of economic gains. Average annual per capita earnings of fishing laborer range from Rs.13,200 for a motorized dingi with bagnet to Rs. 1,27,200 for a mechanized purse seiner. Significant variation is also observed even within groups of crafts namely trawlers, gillnetters, purseseiners, motorized, and traditional crafts. The analysis indicate that there is high incidence of poverty in the coastal rural sector explicitly revealing that majority of these people still could not get much of the benefits of the economic development taken place in our country." @default.
• W1569205221 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1569205221 creator A5048409000 @default.
• W1569205221 date "2009-09-30" @default.
• W1569205221 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W1569205221 title "Inter-sectoral Disparity and Marginalization in Marine Fisheries in India" @default.
• W1569205221 cites W148647345 @default.
• W1569205221 cites W191201260 @default.
• W1569205221 cites W2029003289 @default.
• W1569205221 cites W2265079924 @default.
• W1569205221 cites W2345660156 @default.
• W1569205221 cites W28928645 @default.
• W1569205221 doi "https://doi.org/10.33997/j.afs.2009.22.2.036" @default.
• W1569205221 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1569205221 type Work @default.
• W1569205221 sameAs 1569205221 @default.
• W1569205221 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W1569205221 countsByYear W15692052212013 @default.
• W1569205221 countsByYear W15692052212014 @default.
• W1569205221 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1569205221 hasAuthorship W1569205221A5048409000 @default.
• W1569205221 hasBestOaLocation W15692052211 @default.
• W1569205221 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W1569205221 hasConcept C2909208804 @default.
• W1569205221 hasConcept C2993248064 @default.
• W1569205221 hasConcept C505870484 @default.
• W1569205221 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1569205221 hasConceptScore W1569205221C205649164 @default.
• W1569205221 hasConceptScore W1569205221C2909208804 @default.
• W1569205221 hasConceptScore W1569205221C2993248064 @default.
• W1569205221 hasConceptScore W1569205221C505870484 @default.
• W1569205221 hasConceptScore W1569205221C86803240 @default.
• W1569205221 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W1569205221 hasLocation W15692052211 @default.
• W1569205221 hasLocation W15692052212 @default.
• W1569205221 hasOpenAccess W1569205221 @default.
• W1569205221 hasPrimaryLocation W15692052211 @default.
• W1569205221 hasRelatedWork W2136808700 @default.
• W1569205221 hasRelatedWork W2168650991 @default.
• W1569205221 hasRelatedWork W2791277974 @default.
• W1569205221 hasRelatedWork W2796777741 @default.
• W1569205221 hasRelatedWork W2797493453 @default.
• W1569205221 hasRelatedWork W283315070 @default.
• W1569205221 hasRelatedWork W4235151032 @default.
• W1569205221 hasRelatedWork W4235544405 @default.
• W1569205221 hasRelatedWork W4246144654 @default.
• W1569205221 hasRelatedWork W4252560192 @default.
• W1569205221 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W1569205221 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1569205221 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1569205221 magId "1569205221" @default.
• W1569205221 workType "article" @default.