Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1569276499> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1569276499 endingPage "e143" @default.
- W1569276499 startingPage "e143" @default.
- W1569276499 abstract "Patients have been increasingly seeking and using Internet health information to become more active in managing their own health in a partnership with their physicians. This trend has both positive and negative effects on the interactions between patients and their physicians. Therefore, it is important to understand the impact that the increasing use of Internet health information has on the patient-physician relationship and patients' compliance with their treatment regimens.This study examines the impact of patients' use of Internet health information on various elements that characterize the interactions between a patient and her/his physician through a theoretical model based on principal-agent theory and the information asymmetry perspective.A survey-based study consisting of 225 participants was used to validate a model through various statistical techniques. A full assessment of the measurement model and structural model was completed in addition to relevant post hoc analyses.This research revealed that both patient-physician concordance and perceived information asymmetry have significant effects on patient compliance, with patient-physician concordance exhibiting a considerably stronger relationship. Additionally, both physician quality and Internet health information quality have significant effects on patient-physician concordance, with physician quality exhibiting a much stronger relationship. Finally, only physician quality was found to have a significant impact on perceived information asymmetry, whereas Internet health information quality had no impact on perceived information asymmetry.Overall, this study found that physicians can relax regarding their fears concerning patient use of Internet health information because physician quality has the greatest impact on patients and their physician coming to an agreement on their medical situation and recommended treatment regimen as well as patient's compliance with their physician's advice when compared to the impact that Internet health information quality has on these same variables. The findings also indicate that agreement between the patient and physician on the medical situation and treatment is much more important to compliance than the perceived information gap between the patient and physician (ie, the physician having a higher level of information in comparison to the patient). In addition, the level of agreement between a patient and their physician regarding the medical situation is more reliant on the perceived quality of their physician than on the perceived quality of Internet health information used. This research found that only the perceived quality of the physician has a significant relationship with the perceived information gap between the patient and their physician and the quality of the Internet health information has no relationship with this perceived information gap." @default.
- W1569276499 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1569276499 creator A5017107640 @default.
- W1569276499 creator A5050421385 @default.
- W1569276499 creator A5069475955 @default.
- W1569276499 date "2015-06-11" @default.
- W1569276499 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W1569276499 title "The Impact of Internet Health Information on Patient Compliance: A Research Model and an Empirical Study" @default.
- W1569276499 cites W119818611 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W136176785 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W136722675 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1480791820 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1499933576 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1574738957 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1578907434 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1600139810 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1702139501 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1886867534 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1963641458 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1987286832 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1988050849 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1992062962 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W1995039629 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2008702871 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2009989010 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2012618564 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2014353410 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2021071759 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2021658447 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2024508244 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2032091634 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2045831130 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2051565416 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2053780376 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2056172506 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2068183920 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2068838583 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2074623144 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2074738896 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2082556796 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2095299437 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2096403657 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2097566882 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2098818508 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2110078189 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2114107649 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2116305749 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2124059803 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2124421215 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2125326971 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2127304963 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2130892515 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2133884730 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2145355470 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2146410840 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2150236945 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2151681601 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2154460443 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2155441883 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2157358345 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2162583913 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2501702703 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W2746562707 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W3125252073 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W3147343449 @default.
- W1569276499 cites W77377736 @default.
- W1569276499 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4333" @default.
- W1569276499 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4526934" @default.
- W1569276499 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26068214" @default.
- W1569276499 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W1569276499 type Work @default.
- W1569276499 sameAs 1569276499 @default.
- W1569276499 citedByCount "120" @default.
- W1569276499 countsByYear W15692764992016 @default.
- W1569276499 countsByYear W15692764992017 @default.
- W1569276499 countsByYear W15692764992018 @default.
- W1569276499 countsByYear W15692764992019 @default.
- W1569276499 countsByYear W15692764992020 @default.
- W1569276499 countsByYear W15692764992021 @default.
- W1569276499 countsByYear W15692764992022 @default.
- W1569276499 countsByYear W15692764992023 @default.
- W1569276499 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1569276499 hasAuthorship W1569276499A5017107640 @default.
- W1569276499 hasAuthorship W1569276499A5050421385 @default.
- W1569276499 hasAuthorship W1569276499A5069475955 @default.
- W1569276499 hasBestOaLocation W15692764991 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C145642194 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W1569276499 hasConcept C160798450 @default.