FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1569327494> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1569327494 abstract "RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MIND MAP LEARNING STRATEGY AND CRITICAL THINKING IN MEDICAL STUDENTS Anthony V. D'Antoni Seton Hall University 2009 Dr. Genevieve Pinto Zipp, Chair Background: One learning strategy underutilized in medical education is mind mapping. Mind maps are multi-sensory tools that may help students organize, integrate, and retain information. Recent work suggests that using mind mapping as a note-taking strategy facilitates critical thinking. The purposes of this study were to (1) investigate whether a relationship existed between mind mapping and critical thinking, as measured by the Health Sciences Reasoning Test (HSRT), (2) investigate whether a relationship existed between mind mapping and recall of domain-based information, and (3) assess student learning style with the Gregorc Style Delineator (GSD). Methods: A sample of 131 first-year medical students was assigned to a standard note taking (SNT) group or mind map (MM) group. Subjects were administered a demographic survey, GSD, and pre-HSRT. They were then given an unfamiliar text passage, a pre-quiz based upon the passage, and a 30-minute break, during which time subjects in the MM group were given a presentation on mind mapping. After the break, subjects were given the same passage and wrote notes based on their group (SNT or MM) assignment. A post-quiz based upon the passage was administered, followed by a post-HSRT. Correlations were used to investigate whether any relationships existed between mind map depth, using a Mind Map Assessment System (MMAS), and critical thinking. Other correlations were used to investigate relationships between mind map depth, GSD learning style, and HSRT score. Results: There were no significant differences in mean scores on both the pre-quizzes and post-quizzes between note-taking groups. No significant differences were found between preand post-HSRT mean total scores and subscores. The prevalence of dominant learning styles in all subjects regardless of note-taking group was: CS > AR > CR >AS. lnterrater reliability of the MMAS was strong (ICC = .86). Conclusion: Mind mapping was not found to increase short-term recall of domain-based information, or critical thinking, when compared to SNT. However, a brief introduction to mind mapping did allow novice MM subjects to perform similarly to subjects experienced with SNT. Future studies should be designed so that subjects gain proficiency in mind mapping prior to measuring critical thinking. Chapter" @default.
• W1569327494 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1569327494 creator A5011399969 @default.
• W1569327494 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W1569327494 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W1569327494 title "Relationship between the mind map learning strategy and critical thinking in medical students" @default.
• W1569327494 cites W122518437 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1500257702 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1519604554 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1557361834 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1571462585 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1592151292 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1656484417 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1949511715 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1965165737 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1969813006 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1974892369 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1978454280 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1979650200 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1985388016 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1987214476 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1988388836 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1999726215 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2006001320 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2013862396 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2018591760 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2021101792 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2025187395 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2026801098 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2032827140 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2051115506 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2054694407 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2057455447 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2062772124 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W206396107 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2067724039 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2068471106 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2073054545 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2074274190 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2080268678 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2080325432 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2084398899 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2088180263 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2092626668 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2093264707 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2100280067 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2100350270 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2110405233 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2111850254 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2114784996 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2117385492 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2140699288 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2141403362 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2150853818 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2157414495 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2157925391 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2163900947 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2171753760 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2226921428 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2232378402 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2264625815 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2769416443 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W3198781155 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W618954775 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W96049271 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W1032063628 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2579903570 @default.
• W1569327494 cites W2608791844 @default.
• W1569327494 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1569327494 type Work @default.
• W1569327494 sameAs 1569327494 @default.
• W1569327494 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1569327494 countsByYear W15693274942015 @default.
• W1569327494 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1569327494 hasAuthorship W1569327494A5011399969 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C100660578 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C200287777 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C2776445246 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C2779808312 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C533356498 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C100660578 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C142362112 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C145420912 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C151730666 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C153349607 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C15744967 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C180747234 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C200287777 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C2776445246 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C2777267654 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C2779808312 @default.
• W1569327494 hasConceptScore W1569327494C533356498 @default.

• next