FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1569563174> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1569563174 startingPage "5" @default.
• W1569563174 abstract "After years of intensive political debate on policy and funding, Europe now moving ahead with its plans to create rival to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). It's been long, bumpy path, with the outcome not at all certain. In June, heads of state from the 27-member European Union chose Budapest for the headquarters of its new European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), along with governing board of 18 eminent figures largely from the science, academic and business sectors. And by the end of 2009, the first three research clusters, called Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs), will be established. These planned steps come after the European Parliament earlier this year gave the final green light for EIT, which to be up and running in 2010. With the EU-wide institute, European policy makers aim to combine all three elements of the so-called knowledge triangle-innovation, research and education. Its core task will be to promote and coordinate research projects in member states as partnerships between public scientific institutes and private industry. In the startup phase, the initial focus will be on three areas, each serving as KIC: renewable energies, environmental protection, and advanced information and communications technologies. The KICs are to consist of at least three partner organizations, situated in at least two different member states and including at least one higher education institution and one private company. Pole of Attraction The European Commission, the EU executive arm, has spent the past few years lobbying member states for approval of the technology institute. In an earlier speech, Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso referred to the technology institute as a pole of attraction for the very best minds, ideas and companies from around the world. He and many other policy makers in Brussels view the institute as crucial factor in advancing the EU's Lisbon agenda for jobs and growth, the faltering initiative aimed initially at setting the Community on path to compete more successfully with the U.S. and, more recently, on meeting the high-tech challenge from China and India. A Commission study paper on EIT warned that China alone produces more math, science and technology graduates each year than the whole of the EU. The establishment of EIT, however, has been anything but easy, and some member states, particularly the U.K., remain skeptical about the technology center's ability to tap into Europe's huge but fragmented research community and spur it to greater achievement. Professor Ian Leslie, vice chancellor for research at Cambridge University, has gone on record saying that EIT is strange way of doing things: The notion of top down innovation an oxymoron. After several months of intensive wrangling over financing subsidies, the Commission agreed at the end of last year to whittle down its direct contribution to EIT to total [euro]308.7 million ($477 million) for the 2008-2013 budget period. That's far cry from the [euro]2.5 billion ($3.7 billion) initially sought by Barroso. The Commission head eventually gave into European parliamentarians who feared that the new institute would create further drain on the heavily depleted allocations to the EU's 7th Research Framework Program (FP7). Under the current agreement, EIT will have budget of [euro]2.4 billion, of which more than [euro]2 billion will now come from public and private partners, as well as from income generated by the institute's activities. That's not the only change. Early plans to have EIT equipped with its own doctoral program and right to award PhD. degrees were shot down after numerous European universities warned that the institute would hire away their best research staff and weaken their dominant position in awarding doctoral degrees. …" @default.
• W1569563174 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1569563174 creator A5076439159 @default.
• W1569563174 date "2008-09-01" @default.
• W1569563174 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1569563174 title "Europe Rival to MIT Advances" @default.
• W1569563174 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W1569563174 type Work @default.
• W1569563174 sameAs 1569563174 @default.
• W1569563174 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1569563174 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1569563174 hasAuthorship W1569563174A5076439159 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C132829578 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C2777861868 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C2780510313 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C2781440851 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C3019422483 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C3020782553 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C120912362 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C132829578 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C144133560 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C154945302 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C155202549 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C17744445 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C199539241 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C2777861868 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C2780510313 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C2781440851 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C2910001868 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C3019422483 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C3020782553 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C3116431 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C39549134 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C41008148 @default.
• W1569563174 hasConceptScore W1569563174C94625758 @default.
• W1569563174 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1569563174 hasLocation W15695631741 @default.
• W1569563174 hasOpenAccess W1569563174 @default.
• W1569563174 hasPrimaryLocation W15695631741 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W1499530755 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W1499665004 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W1510377995 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W1566320023 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W1577880446 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W1953763990 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W2037958916 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W2049286803 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W2081410618 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W212865087 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W2334856597 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W236339442 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W2611361095 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W268872346 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W3015813398 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W596713585 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W1522758889 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W1592904244 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W251925564 @default.
• W1569563174 hasRelatedWork W264114920 @default.
• W1569563174 hasVolume "51" @default.
• W1569563174 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1569563174 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1569563174 magId "1569563174" @default.
• W1569563174 workType "article" @default.