FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1570021158> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1570021158 startingPage "1407" @default.
• W1570021158 abstract "Each of the Supreme Court’s high school student speech cases reflected the social angst of its era. In 1965’s Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, three Iowa teens broke school rules to wear armbands protesting the Vietnam war. In 1983, amidst parental and political upset about youth exposure to sexuality in the media, Bethel School District v. Fraser and Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier allowed censoring of an innuendo-filled student government speech and a school newspaper article on teen pregnancy and parental divorce. In 2007, Morse v. Frederick paralleled the 2000s rise of reality television and online self-exposure: an iconoclastic student, long feuding with his principal, unfurled a cryptically drug-themed banner (“BONG HiTS 4 JESUS”) as national television news crews visited his sleepy Alaska town. Many depict the school speech cases as fundamental alterations of student-school relationships, or even of the basic role of minors in society. Tinker draws praise as the landmark decision on student rights, and on minors’ constitutional rights generally; detractors complain that it “departed from the traditional . . . vision of education, which emphasizes order, civility, and the inculcation of virtue.” And the broader body of school speech caselaw is a familiar three-act Supreme Court saga: the 1960s Warren Court declared a new right; the Burger and Rehnquist Courts chipped away at it; and the Roberts Court undercut it further, leading Tinker detractors to say the Court is restoring their preferred traditionalist vision, while Tinker supporters lament that the Court “eviscerated” Tinker with “exceptions . . . swallow[ing] the Tinker rule” and “unquestioned deference” to school officials. This Article argues that a closer look shows a more nuanced state of affairs than the prevailing narrative of landmark decisions sweepingly altering the legal landscape and handing parties dramatic victories and defeats. Instead, even landmark major decisions such as the school speech cases show the limits of Supreme Court decisions, both for the law and for the litigants themselves. Close factual examination not only of each case, but of the social setting in which the case occurred, show that each was a major life event for each student, school, and community – but also that each had a surprisingly modest real-world impact, for the law and for the students litigants’ lives. On the law, none of the student speech cases reshaped the legal landscape to the extent commonly depicted. Tinker never had the impact on actual schools that it had on paper; the infeasibility of most speech litigation left censorship widespread and lawsuits rare. And schools’ post-Tinker wins never really gutted Tinker, as the unexpected continued vitality of Tinker in the lower courts shows. On the facts, each Court decision had unexpectedly limited impact on the student litigants themselves, as this Article documents with not only contemporary media accounts, but new interviews with various of the students and their attorneys. Whether the students won or lost at the Court bore little relationship to whether they felt victorious or defeated. Some who lost at the Court, or never reached a final verdict, express a striking sense of vindication from their cases. Another losing plaintiff found vindication in further legal battles and further speech shenanigans. Only one losing plaintiff actually expressed a complete sense of defeat and largely left behind any ambitions of issue advocacy. With their cases affecting them unpredictably, the six plaintiffs in the four school speech cases are the most vivid illustrations of the limits of Supreme Court decisions. The Overhyped Path from Tinker to Morse: How the Student Speech Cases Show the Limits of Supreme Court Decisions – for the Law and for the Litigants" @default.
• W1570021158 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1570021158 creator A5068752818 @default.
• W1570021158 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W1570021158 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W1570021158 title "The Overhyped Path from Tinker to Morse: How the Student Speech Cases Show the Limits of Supreme Court Decisions – for the Law and for the Litigants" @default.
• W1570021158 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W1570021158 type Work @default.
• W1570021158 sameAs 1570021158 @default.
• W1570021158 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W1570021158 countsByYear W15700211582013 @default.
• W1570021158 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1570021158 hasAuthorship W1570021158A5068752818 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConcept C2778828181 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConcept C2778976716 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConcept C47855350 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConceptScore W1570021158C144024400 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConceptScore W1570021158C17744445 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConceptScore W1570021158C19165224 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConceptScore W1570021158C199539241 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConceptScore W1570021158C2778272461 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConceptScore W1570021158C2778828181 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConceptScore W1570021158C2778976716 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConceptScore W1570021158C47855350 @default.
• W1570021158 hasConceptScore W1570021158C94625758 @default.
• W1570021158 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W1570021158 hasLocation W15700211581 @default.
• W1570021158 hasOpenAccess W1570021158 @default.
• W1570021158 hasPrimaryLocation W15700211581 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W142660557 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W2077331333 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W228269051 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W2316552649 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W241311995 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W2484857510 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W2809595885 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W2903743728 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W3011674372 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W3121137491 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W3121323088 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W3121385498 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W3124183905 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W3125722338 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W590674298 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W2033523349 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W2185040985 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W2917687467 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W3083265603 @default.
• W1570021158 hasRelatedWork W3123435806 @default.
• W1570021158 hasVolume "63" @default.
• W1570021158 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1570021158 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1570021158 magId "1570021158" @default.
• W1570021158 workType "article" @default.