FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1570229895> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1570229895 abstract "Because of the rapid growth of the web and its users, web usability and accessibility become more and more important. This chapter describes two automated methods for evaluating usability/accessibility of webpages. The first method, for usability evaluation, is based on interaction logging and analyses, and the second method, for accessibility evaluation, is based on machine learning. In the following Sections 2 and 3, the two methods are described respectively. Several methods have been proposed and developed for usability evaluation based on user interaction logs. Interaction logs can be recorded by computer logging programs (automated logging) or by human evaluators (observational logging). Analysis methods and tools for the former type of logs are well summarized by Ivory (Ivory & Hearst, 2001; Ivory, 2003), and those for the latter type of logs have also been developed (for example, by Qiang (Qiang et al., 2005)). Our method is for analyzing former type of logs. In the survey by Ivory, analysis methods for automatically captured log files for WIMP (Window, Icon, Menu and Pointing device) applications and web applications are categorized in terms of their approaches including metric-based, pattern-based, task-based and inferential ones. Some of the methods with the task-based approach compare user interaction logs for a test task with desired (expected) interaction sequences for the task and detect inconsistencies between the user logs and the desired sequences (Kishi, 1995; Uehling & Wolf, 1995; Okada & Asahi, 1996; Al-Qaimari & Mcrostie, 1999; Helfrich & Landay, 1999; Zettlemoyer et al., 1999). The inconsistencies are useful cues for finding usability problems: for example, an evaluator can find that users selected some unexpected link on a webpage when another link on the page was expected for the test task and that the link selected by the users may have some usability problem in its design (labeling, layout, etc.). The existing methods require widget-level logs for the comparisons. For example, the method proposed by Okada (Okada & Asahi, 1996) requires interaction logs to include data of widget properties such as widget label, widget type, title of parent window, etc. This requirement degrades independency and completeness of the methods in logging user interactions with systems under evaluation. Section 2 in this chapter describes our method that detects inconsistencies between user logs and desired sequences based on logs of clicked points ((x, y) coordinate values). Coordinate values of clicked points can be easily and fully logged independently of what widgets are clicked on. Several existing methods have also" @default.
• W1570229895 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1570229895 creator A5036449815 @default.
• W1570229895 creator A5071248389 @default.
• W1570229895 date "2008-10-01" @default.
• W1570229895 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W1570229895 title "Automated Methods for Webpage Usability &amp; Accessibility Evaluations" @default.
• W1570229895 cites W139547833 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W1525621534 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W1558046676 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W1560642150 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W166861783 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W1707092108 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W1985995642 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W2055380454 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W2061101652 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W2108059865 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W2122086994 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W2138147278 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W2149706766 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W2248954145 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W28055489 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W3121299688 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W560774975 @default.
• W1570229895 cites W158684176 @default.
• W1570229895 doi "https://doi.org/10.5772/5920" @default.
• W1570229895 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W1570229895 type Work @default.
• W1570229895 sameAs 1570229895 @default.
• W1570229895 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W1570229895 countsByYear W15702298952014 @default.
• W1570229895 countsByYear W15702298952020 @default.
• W1570229895 countsByYear W15702298952022 @default.
• W1570229895 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W1570229895 hasAuthorship W1570229895A5036449815 @default.
• W1570229895 hasAuthorship W1570229895A5071248389 @default.
• W1570229895 hasBestOaLocation W15702298951 @default.
• W1570229895 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W1570229895 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1570229895 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W1570229895 hasConcept C21959979 @default.
• W1570229895 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1570229895 hasConceptScore W1570229895C107457646 @default.
• W1570229895 hasConceptScore W1570229895C136764020 @default.
• W1570229895 hasConceptScore W1570229895C170130773 @default.
• W1570229895 hasConceptScore W1570229895C21959979 @default.
• W1570229895 hasConceptScore W1570229895C41008148 @default.
• W1570229895 hasLocation W15702298951 @default.
• W1570229895 hasLocation W15702298952 @default.
• W1570229895 hasLocation W15702298953 @default.
• W1570229895 hasOpenAccess W1570229895 @default.
• W1570229895 hasPrimaryLocation W15702298951 @default.
• W1570229895 hasRelatedWork W1508029546 @default.
• W1570229895 hasRelatedWork W1605195241 @default.
• W1570229895 hasRelatedWork W2139936664 @default.
• W1570229895 hasRelatedWork W2168467665 @default.
• W1570229895 hasRelatedWork W2182917878 @default.
• W1570229895 hasRelatedWork W2230931254 @default.
• W1570229895 hasRelatedWork W2783909775 @default.
• W1570229895 hasRelatedWork W3040994820 @default.
• W1570229895 hasRelatedWork W3145385871 @default.
• W1570229895 hasRelatedWork W2443000088 @default.
• W1570229895 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1570229895 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1570229895 magId "1570229895" @default.
• W1570229895 workType "book-chapter" @default.