FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1570340478> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1570340478 endingPage "137" @default.
• W1570340478 startingPage "134" @default.
• W1570340478 abstract "Reviewed by: Wild Justice: A Study of Euripides’ Hecuba Georgia Ann Machemer Mossman, Judith. Wild Justice: A Study of Euripides’ Hecuba. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995. xiv 1 283 pp. Cloth, $55. (Oxford Classical Monographs) Judith Mossman’s monograph on Euripides’ Hecuba deserves its accolades. It is well-written, well-argued, and shows a quality sometimes lacking in today’s publish-or-perish world, scholarly integrity. Sceptical of the theses she seeks to refute, Mossman nevertheless adopts no arrogant poses, but carefully weighs the merits of each position before casting it aside. Having found questions in a vast array of comparative and critical material, she meticulously develops answers from the ancient evidence itself, comprehensively drawing into one orbit not just classical Greek poetry and Attic tragedies, but also a variety of prose works, both early and late. In no way arbitrary, her comment avoids easy solutions garnered from contemporary fields of thought and faces even intractable textual problems head-on. With its sights high, the book never wanders wide of the mark, claiming neither too much nor too little. Nor does it pretend to [End Page 134] a fashionable last word on its subject, preferring rather to advance a tradition of interpretation so that those who later raise objections will happily find themselves engaged in a dialogue with its author in the common search for new insights. Dr. Mossman’s obvious admiration for Hecuba is affirmed by the play’s history as a select text in the Byzantine manuscript tradition, and, as she demonstrates in her “Epilogue” (210–43), by the esteem accorded it in subsequent ages, especially the Renaissance, which considered it an ancient type of the then popular revenge tragedy. As I lack the background, however, to judge her winning treatment of Hecuba’s Renaissance heritage, I shall confine my remarks here to her presentation of the play’s internal dramatic excellence. This I found to be well conceived, thorough, and convincing. The opening chapters on antecedent myth, the structural unity of spoken dialogue with conjectured stage spectacle, and the dramatic integration of the chorus serve as a suitable warm-up for the more controversial topics of the later chapters. Of these preliminary exercises I was most taken by Mossman’s reconstruction of the play’s original staging and its possible effect on the contemporary audience (chapter 2). It was a good idea to pay attention to this experiential dimension at the outset. By doing so the author alerts her readers not only to the natural indeterminacy of dramatic texts, but also to the enormous gap between our literary readings of ancient plays and our perusal of them as vehicles for performances, ancient or otherwise. Mossman plays this critical game well. What she says is lucid and enlivening. Nevertheless, the heart of her discussion lies elsewhere, in the chapters on Euripides’ “rhetoric as a characterizing force” (94), Polyxena’s heroic sacrificial death, and the justice of Hecuba’s savage revenge. In these chapters Mossman successfully takes up the cudgel, first against the rhetorical formalists who argue that characters in Greek tragedies are often poorly motivated, inconsistent, generalized types that have been created largely without regard to individualizing details of the plot, a view sometimes wrongly attributed to Aristotle (see especially the excursus on Aristotle, 138–41); she then counters Nicole Loraux’s post-Freudian, feminist belief in the erotic nature of Polyxena’s sacrifice (Tragic Ways of Killing a Woman, tr. Anthony Forster [Harvard 1987; orig. publ. Paris 1985] 56–61); and finally she argues against the many who, like Martha Nussbaum (The Fragility of Goodness [Cambridge 1986] 408, 414–16) claim that in the play’s second half Hecuba degenerates into subhuman brutality. As regards character development, Mossman contends that what we see in ancient drama is never a change of ethos, but the interplay of ethos and events and the delineation of “successive emotions which arise in response to successive situations” (102). As in the rhetorical handbooks, speeches must be judged by their appropriateness to type of both speaker and addressee and to the specifics of the individual case. Using these ancient principles, Mossman reviews the speeches of the play and, by means of their opposing and..." @default.
• W1570340478 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1570340478 creator A5019699359 @default.
• W1570340478 date "1997-01-01" @default.
• W1570340478 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1570340478 title "Book Review: Wild Justice: A Study of Euripides' Hecuba" @default.
• W1570340478 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.1997.0006" @default.
• W1570340478 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W1570340478 type Work @default.
• W1570340478 sameAs 1570340478 @default.
• W1570340478 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1570340478 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1570340478 hasAuthorship W1570340478A5019699359 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C18296254 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C2776678506 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C2778120072 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C111472728 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C124952713 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C138885662 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C139621336 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C142362112 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C161191863 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C17744445 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C18296254 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C199539241 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C2776678506 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C2777855551 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C2778120072 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C41008148 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C41895202 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C527412718 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C74916050 @default.
• W1570340478 hasConceptScore W1570340478C95457728 @default.
• W1570340478 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1570340478 hasLocation W15703404781 @default.
• W1570340478 hasOpenAccess W1570340478 @default.
• W1570340478 hasPrimaryLocation W15703404781 @default.
• W1570340478 hasRelatedWork W2048449309 @default.
• W1570340478 hasRelatedWork W2059453367 @default.
• W1570340478 hasRelatedWork W2126464202 @default.
• W1570340478 hasRelatedWork W2164366808 @default.
• W1570340478 hasRelatedWork W2319053905 @default.
• W1570340478 hasRelatedWork W2621247159 @default.
• W1570340478 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1570340478 hasRelatedWork W2789482323 @default.
• W1570340478 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1570340478 hasRelatedWork W94284690 @default.
• W1570340478 hasVolume "118" @default.
• W1570340478 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1570340478 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1570340478 magId "1570340478" @default.
• W1570340478 workType "article" @default.