FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1570352811> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1570352811 endingPage "384" @default.
• W1570352811 startingPage "384" @default.
• W1570352811 abstract "IntroductionRealism, as an form, has long been indicted for its complicity with ideological conservatism. In this essay, I argue for reconsideration of realism as critical tool in formation of contemporary politics. In developing this claim, I draw upon Jacques Ranciere's insights regarding potential for formations to take on political dimension by introducing into [our sense of community] new subjects and objects, . . . render [ing] visible what had not been, and ... mak[ing] heard as speakers those who had been perceived as mere noisy animals.1 Such shifts in our capacity to envision new realities can change the landscape of by rupturing anticipated correlations between images and their meanings and images and their effects.2An politics, in Ranciere's sense, requires shift from of art to what he calls aesthetic regime.''For Ranciere, this transition must no longerbe understood as simple break with mimetic realism in favor of nonfigurative art. As he puts it, the break with [the representational regime] does not consist in painting white squares rather than . . . warriors.3 Rather than discarding figurative art, this break requires giving up idea that representational form carries what he calls an expressive complement, such at that between a lion and courage.4 More specifically, break from representative to regime involves for Ranciere recognition that an image can no longer be simply understood as expression of thought or feeling.5 Such codified meanings, he argues, reproduce status quo by limiting ability of things to exist in ways that have not yet been thought and thus suppress potential to bring to life possible new ways of being.This essay follows Ranciere in refusing to claim that realist forms of art are inconsistent with political aesthetics. I consider range of art and media examples with aim of teasing out particular relationships between realism and deception that may maximize realism's potential to disrupt given ideological formations. My main contention will be that realism's potential political power lies not in its ability to guide spectator toward previously unseen truths or to see through deception. Rather, its potential emerges by staging deceptions that imperil any recourse to metalanguage that sustains very categories of true and false, thereby undermining possibility of belief and system of authority that secures it. To put this more generally in Rancierian terms, realism's charge in project of politics is to conspire with deception in order to dispute established regime of representation and generate what he calls new of sensible, through which new organizations of perception may emerge.6 In what follows, I consider series of examples that, in increasingly complex ways, address political question of how to create new distribution of sensible by undermining structure of belief and system of authority (the big Other, in Lacanian parlance) that sustain given arrangement.7 I illustrate this politics through sculptural figures created by Ron Mueck, which, I argue, innovatively harness potentially transformative moment when established perceptual framework begins to fray. In particular, Mueck's use of scale to disrupt illusion of reality illuminates ways in which realist forms of art carry political potential to open up opportunities for new ways of seeing, understanding, and being in world. His sculptures do this by inaugurating new twist on conventional trompe l'oeil by reproducing, at level of context, deception that traditionally occurs only at level of form.Belief, Doubt, and Big OtherAt first sight, sculptural figures produced by Australian artist Ron Mueck appear as unimpeachable examples of perfected mimetic form. …" @default.
• W1570352811 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1570352811 creator A5081522886 @default.
• W1570352811 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W1570352811 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W1570352811 title "Imperfecting the Illusion: Belief and the Aesthetic Destruction of Reality" @default.
• W1570352811 cites W4233736451 @default.
• W1570352811 doi "https://doi.org/10.13110/discourse.35.3.0384" @default.
• W1570352811 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1570352811 type Work @default.
• W1570352811 sameAs 1570352811 @default.
• W1570352811 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1570352811 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1570352811 hasAuthorship W1570352811A5081522886 @default.
• W1570352811 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W1570352811 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1570352811 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1570352811 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W1570352811 hasConcept C184047640 @default.
• W1570352811 hasConceptScore W1570352811C107038049 @default.
• W1570352811 hasConceptScore W1570352811C142362112 @default.
• W1570352811 hasConceptScore W1570352811C15744967 @default.
• W1570352811 hasConceptScore W1570352811C180747234 @default.
• W1570352811 hasConceptScore W1570352811C184047640 @default.
• W1570352811 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W1570352811 hasLocation W15703528111 @default.
• W1570352811 hasOpenAccess W1570352811 @default.
• W1570352811 hasPrimaryLocation W15703528111 @default.
• W1570352811 hasRelatedWork W1977010594 @default.
• W1570352811 hasRelatedWork W2004361609 @default.
• W1570352811 hasRelatedWork W2019598108 @default.
• W1570352811 hasRelatedWork W2026813833 @default.
• W1570352811 hasRelatedWork W2030320909 @default.
• W1570352811 hasRelatedWork W2038510734 @default.
• W1570352811 hasRelatedWork W2312755947 @default.
• W1570352811 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1570352811 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1570352811 hasRelatedWork W2900738253 @default.
• W1570352811 hasVolume "35" @default.
• W1570352811 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1570352811 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1570352811 magId "1570352811" @default.
• W1570352811 workType "article" @default.