FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1570841135> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1570841135 startingPage "1" @default.
• W1570841135 abstract "ABSTRACT The Internet is often regarded as a challenge to the nation-state's ability to regulate flows of finance, information, and symbols. Rather than examining whether it is possible to enforce regulation on such a media, this paper addresses two additional fundamental questions: (1) what do regulatory discourses and attempts to regulate reveal about the nation-state's political authority under globalization, and (2) how does this authority vary across social, political, and cultural contexts? In order to address these challenging queries we follow a unique path, both empirically and theoretically. Theoretically, we argue that political authority is a pivotal common denominator that undergirds diverse understandings of globalization. We then critically examine different conceptions of political authority and construct a typology that orients our study. Empirically, we follow our typology by comparing two historical phenomena: attempts by the Catholic Church to regulate the printing press during the 15th and 16th centuries, and attempts by China, Malaysia and the United States to regulate the Internet. Despite certain important commonalities, we posit that each of these cases illustrates a different model of the legitimization processes and transformations in political authority that occur under globalization. I. INTRODUCTION: THE INTERNET AND POLITICAL AUTHORITY 3 II. CONCEPTUALISING POLITICAL AUTHORITY 8 A. PERFORMANCE-BASED LEGITIMACY AND THE CHANGING ROLE OF 12 THE STATE B. CONSTRUCTED LEGITIMACY AND UNIFYING MYTHS 13 C. LEGAL-FORMAL LEGITIMACY 14 III. THE PRINTING PRESS 15 A. THE INVENTION OF THE PRINTING PRESS 16 B. CENTRAL AUTHORITIES' POLICIES TOWARDS THE PRINTING PRESS 17 IV. INTERNET REGULATION 20 A. CHINA 21 B. MALAYSIA 24 C. THE UNITED STATES 26 V. CONCLUSION 28 I. INTRODUCTION: THE INTERNET AND POLITICAL AUTHORITY The globalization debate crosses disciplinary boundaries and transcends academic circles. Participants in this debate typically share a mutual interest in the scope of globalization, its effects, and the expected outcomes. But different disciplines emphasize their specific perspective in this debate. Economists, for example, would most likely highlight questions of economy and finance, while anthropologists are more likely to view globalization from the standpoint of culture and identity. Consequently, the terminologies employed in the study of globalization often differ. Furthermore, the definition of globalization, and its interpretation by students of globalization, varies. The differences can be considerable. (2) Despite greatly divergent conceptions of the studied phenomenon, some underlying common denominators can be found. Central to these are questions related to a nation-state's sovereignty, and more specifically, its capacity to regulate social, economic, and political activity within its defined territory. The relevance of sovereignty in this debate is evident considering that sovereignty is perceived as a chief marker of the modern territorial nationstate and the system of nation-states. (3) Therefore, an analysis of this debate would also include examination of the different views and their validity in relation to the sovereignty yardstick. The most widely accepted view of sovereignty generally perceives it as a given condition of the post-Westphalian political arrangements, constituting territorial states that enjoy an exclusive authority inwardly and outwardly. …" @default.
• W1570841135 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1570841135 creator A5085372121 @default.
• W1570841135 creator A5088787121 @default.
• W1570841135 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W1570841135 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1570841135 title "CHALLENGES TO AUTHORITY, BURDENS OF LEGITIMIZATION: THE PRINTING PRESS AND THE INTERNET" @default.
• W1570841135 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W1570841135 type Work @default.
• W1570841135 sameAs 1570841135 @default.
• W1570841135 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W1570841135 countsByYear W15708411352015 @default.
• W1570841135 countsByYear W15708411352016 @default.
• W1570841135 countsByYear W15708411352017 @default.
• W1570841135 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1570841135 hasAuthorship W1570841135A5085372121 @default.
• W1570841135 hasAuthorship W1570841135A5088787121 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C2119116 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C46295352 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C75795011 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C10138342 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C110875604 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C11413529 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C136764020 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C138921699 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C144024400 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C162324750 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C17744445 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C182306322 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C190253527 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C19165224 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C199539241 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C2119116 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C3116431 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C41008148 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C46295352 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C48103436 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C75795011 @default.
• W1570841135 hasConceptScore W1570841135C94625758 @default.
• W1570841135 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1570841135 hasLocation W15708411351 @default.
• W1570841135 hasOpenAccess W1570841135 @default.
• W1570841135 hasPrimaryLocation W15708411351 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W1527274309 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W1946359695 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W1984975843 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W2012643142 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W2021157457 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W2235688264 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W231334659 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W2336053790 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W2481506181 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W2489530941 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W2500271561 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W2502742254 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W2976675790 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W3124138143 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W3197034812 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W410734725 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W560880216 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W608796416 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W911083586 @default.
• W1570841135 hasRelatedWork W2970155186 @default.
• W1570841135 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W1570841135 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1570841135 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1570841135 magId "1570841135" @default.
• W1570841135 workType "article" @default.