Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1574672380> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 59 of
59
with 100 items per page.
- W1574672380 endingPage "680" @default.
- W1574672380 startingPage "680" @default.
- W1574672380 abstract "The question as to whether competitive bidding or negotiated underwriting is the least-cost method for distributing new issues of public utility bonds remains largely unresolved. This study analyzes the costs on such new issues during the period from January, 1972, through August, 1974. The results indicate that, in general, competitive bidding was the least-cost method of distributing public utility obligations during this period. An analysis of the relationship between issue size, underwriting arrangement (i.e., competitive versus negotiated), and underwriters' charges does, however, suggest that negotiated underwriting may be the preferable alternative in certain circumstances." @default.
- W1574672380 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1574672380 creator A5014442199 @default.
- W1574672380 creator A5057018159 @default.
- W1574672380 date "1976-01-01" @default.
- W1574672380 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W1574672380 title "Competitive versus Negotiated Underwriting of Public Utility Debt" @default.
- W1574672380 cites W1980040830 @default.
- W1574672380 cites W1982099392 @default.
- W1574672380 cites W2022796219 @default.
- W1574672380 cites W2038342575 @default.
- W1574672380 cites W2041682837 @default.
- W1574672380 cites W2043590810 @default.
- W1574672380 cites W2049228437 @default.
- W1574672380 cites W2050633425 @default.
- W1574672380 cites W2143845585 @default.
- W1574672380 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/3003280" @default.
- W1574672380 hasPublicationYear "1976" @default.
- W1574672380 type Work @default.
- W1574672380 sameAs 1574672380 @default.
- W1574672380 citedByCount "25" @default.
- W1574672380 countsByYear W15746723802021 @default.
- W1574672380 countsByYear W15746723802022 @default.
- W1574672380 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1574672380 hasAuthorship W1574672380A5014442199 @default.
- W1574672380 hasAuthorship W1574672380A5057018159 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConcept C120527767 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConcept C26503482 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConcept C556758197 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConceptScore W1574672380C10138342 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConceptScore W1574672380C120527767 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConceptScore W1574672380C162324750 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConceptScore W1574672380C175444787 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConceptScore W1574672380C26503482 @default.
- W1574672380 hasConceptScore W1574672380C556758197 @default.
- W1574672380 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W1574672380 hasLocation W15746723801 @default.
- W1574672380 hasOpenAccess W1574672380 @default.
- W1574672380 hasPrimaryLocation W15746723801 @default.
- W1574672380 hasRelatedWork W1983804552 @default.
- W1574672380 hasRelatedWork W1991668648 @default.
- W1574672380 hasRelatedWork W2004546370 @default.
- W1574672380 hasRelatedWork W2165689772 @default.
- W1574672380 hasRelatedWork W2461890071 @default.
- W1574672380 hasRelatedWork W2474078016 @default.
- W1574672380 hasRelatedWork W2499161928 @default.
- W1574672380 hasRelatedWork W2620297891 @default.
- W1574672380 hasRelatedWork W3122348051 @default.
- W1574672380 hasRelatedWork W3123234645 @default.
- W1574672380 hasVolume "7" @default.
- W1574672380 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1574672380 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1574672380 magId "1574672380" @default.
- W1574672380 workType "article" @default.