Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1574696097> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W1574696097 endingPage "333" @default.
- W1574696097 startingPage "296" @default.
- W1574696097 abstract "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to estimate whether job applicants who have obtained a BSc in economics from 15 UK universities face different labour market prospects. The author examines whether university entry standards and Russell Group membership affect UK economics applicants’ occupational access and entry-level annual salaries when unobserved heterogeneities, such as ability, motivation, family characteristics and networks, are minimized. Design/methodology/approach – The author evaluate the research question by recording the job search processes of 90 British economics applicants from randomly selected universities. The key elements of the approach are as follows: third-year undergraduate students apply for early career jobs that are relevant to their studies. Applications are closely matched in terms of age, ethnicity, experience and other core characteristics. Differential treatment in the access to vacancies and entry-level annual salaries per university applicant are systematically measured. Findings – By observing as much information as a firm does, the estimations suggest that both entry standards and Russell Group membership positively affect applicants’ labour market prospects. Although the firms cannot evaluate by themselves whether graduates from highly reputable universities are more or less capable and motivated than graduates from less reputable universities, it appears that the university attended affects firms’ recruitment policies. Importantly, valuable variables that capture firms’ and jobs’ heterogeneities, such as occupational variation, regions, workplace size, establishment age, and the existence of trade unions and human resources, are also considered and provide new results. Practical implications – Understanding the impact of entry standards and university reputation on students’ labour market outcomes is critical to understanding the role of human capital and screening strategies. In addition, obtaining accurate estimates of the payoff of attending a university with a high entry threshold and reputation is of great importance not only to the parents of prospective students who foot tuition bills but also to the students themselves. Furthermore, universities will be interested in the patterns estimated by this study, which will allow recent UK economists to evaluate the current employment environment. In addition, universities should be keen to know how their own graduates have fared in the labour market compared with graduates of other universities. Originality/value – In the current study, the author attempt to solve the problem of firms’ seeing more information than econometricians by looking at an outcome that is determined before firms see any unobservable characteristics. In the current study, ability, motivation, family characteristics and networks cannot affect applicants’ access to vacancies and entry-level salaries. The current study can estimate the effect of university enrolment on applicants’ occupational access and entry-level salaries, controlling for unobserved characteristics that would themselves affect subsequent outcomes in the labour market." @default.
- W1574696097 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1574696097 creator A5034632139 @default.
- W1574696097 date "2015-06-01" @default.
- W1574696097 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W1574696097 title "Economics applicants in the UK labour market" @default.
- W1574696097 cites W1542245027 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W1964726718 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W1965409174 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W1970289170 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W1971310904 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W1998865302 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2003960890 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2010532565 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2012782417 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2019228727 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2024692342 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2028024362 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2040028915 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2041862023 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2054521915 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2055947654 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2059213107 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2059729140 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2082816436 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2085262835 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2087457888 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2094975045 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2111292692 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2115747715 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2116490565 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2117296882 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2125569954 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2127087511 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2146531185 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2152658843 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2158113418 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2161800660 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W2166257424 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W3023477630 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W3122158902 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W3122259090 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W3124447566 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W4206965643 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W4213058330 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W4213367862 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W4229929041 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W4299689471 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W4301265024 @default.
- W1574696097 cites W99855814 @default.
- W1574696097 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijm-02-2014-0061" @default.
- W1574696097 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W1574696097 type Work @default.
- W1574696097 sameAs 1574696097 @default.
- W1574696097 citedByCount "18" @default.
- W1574696097 countsByYear W15746960972015 @default.
- W1574696097 countsByYear W15746960972016 @default.
- W1574696097 countsByYear W15746960972017 @default.
- W1574696097 countsByYear W15746960972018 @default.
- W1574696097 countsByYear W15746960972019 @default.
- W1574696097 countsByYear W15746960972020 @default.
- W1574696097 countsByYear W15746960972021 @default.
- W1574696097 countsByYear W15746960972022 @default.
- W1574696097 countsByYear W15746960972023 @default.
- W1574696097 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W1574696097 hasAuthorship W1574696097A5034632139 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C137403100 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C145236788 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C2776035688 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C2779304628 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C2781005140 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C2781418482 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C4249254 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C48798503 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConcept C93226319 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConceptScore W1574696097C127413603 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConceptScore W1574696097C137403100 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConceptScore W1574696097C144024400 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConceptScore W1574696097C144133560 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConceptScore W1574696097C145236788 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConceptScore W1574696097C146978453 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConceptScore W1574696097C15744967 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConceptScore W1574696097C162324750 @default.
- W1574696097 hasConceptScore W1574696097C162853370 @default.