FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1574961609> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1574961609 abstract "Background: The importance of respecting people’s inherent dignity was put on the agenda during the last century with the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. From a caring science perspective, the importance of meeting people with respect and taking care of their absolute dignity is also emphasized. Despite all this, patients at psychiatric hospitals still experience suffering and reduced dignity. Aim: The overall aim for this research was to explore patients’, relatives’ and staff members’ views concerning patient dignity at mental health hospitals. In paper I. the aim was to gain a deeper understanding of how the staff in a psychiatric hospital perceive dignity in their encounters with patients and their understanding of what influences a patient’s experience of dignity. In paper II, the aim was to gain a deeper understanding of the subjective experiences of patients in a psychiatric hospital with respect to dignity. The purpose in paper III was to reveal relatives’ opinions regarding what is important for ensuring the preservation of a patient’s dignity when they are admitted to a psychiatric hospital. In paper IV, the focus is on common experiences of patients and relatives in terms of how the dignity of the patient was taken care of when they were admitted to psychiatric hospitals. Method: Two different methodological approaches have been applied. In studies 1, 2 and 3, a Q methodological approach was applied. Based on a Q sort (a collection of statements) developed from qualitative interviews, staff members, patients and relatives were instructed in sorting 51 statements. Patients were asked to order the statements in a grid from those they most agreed with to those they most disagreed with. Relatives and staff were asked to rank the statements based on what they felt was relevant for the patients’ experience of dignity. Post-interviews were performed, with all the participants immediately after they had sorted the statements. The analysis of data was done by performing by person factor analysis for all the patient-, relativesand staff studies (papers IIII). In study 4, a Phenomenological hermeneutics method for researching lived experience guided the analysis of qualitative interviews conducted with patients and relatives. Results: In study 1 (paper I), 25 staff members participated and two different viewpoints emerged. Viewpoint 1 was given the name: ‛Patient Focused Staff’, while viewpoint 2 was called, ‛Challenges for Staff’. In study 2 (paper II), 15 patients participated, and four different viewpoints emerged. Viewpoint 1 was described as, ‛Being met as equal human beings’. Viewpoint 2 was named, ‛Experience of dignity despite suffering’. Viewpoint 3 was interpreted as, ‛Suffering due to feeling inferior’. Viewpoint 4 was described as, ‛Suffering and fighting for one’s own dignity’. Study 3 (paper III), was about relatives’ viewpoints. Thirteen relatives participated and four different viewpoints were identified. Viewpoint 1was named ‛Value based’, viewpoint 2 was about ‛Expectations’, viewpoint 3 was given the name ‛Asymmetric’, while viewpoint 4 was described as ‛Nuanced’. In Study 4 (paper IV), one main theme and four sub-themes were revealed. The main theme was described as, ‛The significance of small things for the experience of dignity’, while the sub-themes were described as, ‛To be conscious of small things’, ‛Being conscious of what one says’, ‛Being met’ and ‛To be aware of personal chemistry’. Conclusion: Within each group of patients, relatives and caregivers, differences but also consensuses were found. Also similarities across the studies were found. The staff’s way of meeting patients and relatives has a direct influence on the patient’s experience of dignity. In encounters where the patient’sand relatives’ experience of being met by staff represents values such as equality and respect for humans’ uniqueness, they experience that the patient’s dignity was being taken care of. All staff members also emphasize this, with some staff also focusing on challenges related to this. Some patients and relatives communicate that there still is an imbalance in their relationship with carers, which is something that increases a patient’s suffering. Other patients and relatives sometimes found it necessary for the staff to take control over the patient’s situation. For caregivers, being aware of their responsibility towards a patient’s suffering opens up an opportunity for a compassionate self in an authentic encounter with patients. As discussed in paper IV, how staff members behave, in addition to putting a focus on small things in each unique encounter with patients in a dignity promotingor dignity inhibitory way, reveals to what degree the staff are aware of their ethos, as well as to what degree both the individual staff members and the caring culture can be experienced as being ethical or not ethical." @default.
• W1574961609 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1574961609 creator A5044454191 @default.
• W1574961609 date "2014-05-12" @default.
• W1574961609 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1574961609 title "Subjective experiences of dignity within mental health care" @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1213259780 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1497390480 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1502881668 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1521578411 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1524382073 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1527868071 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1568872416 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1570280833 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1906076922 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1975332444 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1975367037 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1976053403 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1981492025 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1987641092 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1991559322 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W1997706328 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2001771439 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2002227298 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2006762791 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2008105064 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2010813923 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2011364886 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2012449880 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2015465600 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2017902515 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2019583591 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2020420340 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2023663656 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2024643599 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2026989164 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2027665888 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2036386844 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2037974471 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2039364488 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2040313258 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2051249239 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2065711257 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2068081895 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2069475604 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2070571820 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2078752847 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2080704017 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2081235876 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2081948640 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2084808175 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2085152820 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2086069735 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2095204526 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2097374827 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2097790575 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2101332165 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2101792470 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2102732322 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2107110273 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2117475646 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2117776411 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2123472546 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2124491199 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2126323206 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2129784040 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2132186017 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2133810059 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2139891137 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2142135875 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2145264789 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2149081090 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2149304626 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2149995921 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2152429002 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2158328669 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2159185311 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2163819442 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2169250587 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2325504712 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2468827318 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2731614860 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2800929580 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2830290158 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W575586093 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W78705842 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W92864726 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W9520158 @default.
• W1574961609 cites W2007859296 @default.
• W1574961609 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1574961609 type Work @default.
• W1574961609 sameAs 1574961609 @default.
• W1574961609 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1574961609 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W1574961609 hasAuthorship W1574961609A5044454191 @default.
• W1574961609 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W1574961609 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W1574961609 hasConcept C138147947 @default.
• W1574961609 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1574961609 hasConcept C15744967 @default.

• next