FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1577483746> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1577483746 abstract "The Supreme Court’s recent decision in J. McIntyre Machinery v. Nicastro had the potential to resolve nearly two decades of confusion in personal jurisdiction doctrine. Confronted with the earlier Asahi plurality opinions, which had established competing “stream of commerce” theories, the Court produced a fractured 4-2-3 opinion that resolved little beyond holding that the New Jersey courts could not exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendant in the instant case. In this Article, written for a paper Symposium, I consider one dimension the doctrinal deadlock that the Supreme Court produced in Nicastro: the concept of specific jurisdiction itself. In recent cases, most notably in Nicastro, the Court has become obsessed with the general and abstract contours of the relationship between a defendant and the forum state. However, one of the most important aspects of the distinction between general and specific jurisdiction is the relatedness between the lawsuit and the forum state. In conceptualizing relatedness at the highest level of generality, the Supreme Court has characterized the relatedness problem in a way that is nearly impossible to answer in any concrete case that comes before it. In other words, the Supreme Court has let the perfect become the enemy of the good. Instead of producing a flexible, workable, if not entirely global or perfect rule, the Court has given the lower courts hardly any rule at all. This Article suggests that in order to break the stream of commerce stalemate, the Supreme Court should refocus specific jurisdiction doctrine so that it produces concrete answers to the two dimensions of the relatedness problem. It further argues that Justice Brennan’s stream of commerce position from Asahi remains the most viable path for specific jurisdiction analysis. The expansive scope of the Brennan position fits well with modern understandings of commerce and the domestic and international sale and distribution of goods. Moreover, in tandem with a robust fairness analysis, the stream of commerce position will allow courts to examine the two dimensions of relatedness in a useful, concrete, and doctrinally consistent manner." @default.
• W1577483746 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1577483746 creator A5019573445 @default.
• W1577483746 date "2012-06-15" @default.
• W1577483746 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1577483746 title "Letting the Perfect Become the Enemy of the Good: The Relatedness Problem in Personal Jurisdiction" @default.
• W1577483746 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1577483746 type Work @default.
• W1577483746 sameAs 1577483746 @default.
• W1577483746 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1577483746 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1577483746 hasAuthorship W1577483746A5019573445 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConcept C2777134139 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConcept C2778428080 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConcept C2778495862 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConcept C66487177 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConcept C87501996 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConceptScore W1577483746C17744445 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConceptScore W1577483746C199539241 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConceptScore W1577483746C2776211767 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConceptScore W1577483746C2776949292 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConceptScore W1577483746C2777134139 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConceptScore W1577483746C2778272461 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConceptScore W1577483746C2778428080 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConceptScore W1577483746C2778495862 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConceptScore W1577483746C66487177 @default.
• W1577483746 hasConceptScore W1577483746C87501996 @default.
• W1577483746 hasLocation W15774837461 @default.
• W1577483746 hasOpenAccess W1577483746 @default.
• W1577483746 hasPrimaryLocation W15774837461 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W1589464540 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W201267247 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W2229120737 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W2255943379 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W233465426 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W2525024809 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W253492520 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W2790157778 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W2909606691 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W2941531655 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W3121245616 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W3121446480 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W3121508145 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W3121913738 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W3123120948 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W3123302356 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W3124998576 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W3125527456 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W3213516924 @default.
• W1577483746 hasRelatedWork W765722106 @default.
• W1577483746 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1577483746 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1577483746 magId "1577483746" @default.
• W1577483746 workType "article" @default.