FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1578761792> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1578761792 endingPage "449" @default.
• W1578761792 startingPage "415" @default.
• W1578761792 abstract "Tribunals of the United States have been interpreting IHL ever since the nation was founded. Even before the enactment of the US Constitution, several Founding Fathers believed that membership in the community of nations should be a fundamental aim of the new republic. In the more than two centuries since the Constitution’s enactment, US policy and practice have typically remained within the membership conception. This chapter has described both how the membership conception has influenced US judicial interpretations of IHL and how these interpretations have in turn influenced the international conception of that body of law. US departures from the membership conception of IHL have usually involved measures taken by the executive branch. US tribunals have responded to these departures in a variety of ways. Sometimes they have accepted these initiatives, but often they have rejected them or tailored the measures to IHL principles. This pattern emerged after the Civil War, when the US Supreme Court held in Ex parte Milligan that a military commission could not try a non-belligerent for acts committed outside the theater of war. In In re Yamashita, the Supreme Court upheld a military commission conviction based on a then-novel theory of command responsibility. That doctrine went on to become a key building block for international tribunals. The September 11 attacks provide the latest illustration of the membership argument. After the executive branch responded to the attacks with efforts to change IHL rules on interrogation, detention, and the jurisdiction of military commissions courts pushed back. These responses were often effective, although the Supreme Court’s decision in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld classifying the struggle with al Qaeda as a NIAC may have raised more questions than it answered. With regard to detention courts have applied IHL principles to determine membership in armed groups and the US has begun to implement administrative reviews based on the Fourth Geneva Convention. As of the writing of this chapter, issues regarding military commission jurisdiction are still working their way through US courts. However, the D.C. Circuit’s decision in Hamdan v. United States vacating a conviction for material support of terrorism in the absence of evidence that the defendant had committed an established war crime reaffirmed the US Constitution’s commitment to international law." @default.
• W1578761792 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1578761792 creator A5081911801 @default.
• W1578761792 creator A5084961574 @default.
• W1578761792 date "2014-01-01" @default.
• W1578761792 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1578761792 title "Interpretations of IHL in Tribunals of the United States" @default.
• W1578761792 cites W1838053664 @default.
• W1578761792 cites W1985854952 @default.
• W1578761792 cites W2077133548 @default.
• W1578761792 cites W2110505307 @default.
• W1578761792 cites W3122322329 @default.
• W1578761792 cites W3122378965 @default.
• W1578761792 cites W3125392735 @default.
• W1578761792 cites W615815969 @default.
• W1578761792 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-008-4_15" @default.
• W1578761792 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W1578761792 type Work @default.
• W1578761792 sameAs 1578761792 @default.
• W1578761792 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1578761792 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W1578761792 hasAuthorship W1578761792A5081911801 @default.
• W1578761792 hasAuthorship W1578761792A5084961574 @default.
• W1578761792 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1578761792 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1578761792 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W1578761792 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1578761792 hasConceptScore W1578761792C144024400 @default.
• W1578761792 hasConceptScore W1578761792C17744445 @default.
• W1578761792 hasConceptScore W1578761792C190253527 @default.
• W1578761792 hasConceptScore W1578761792C199539241 @default.
• W1578761792 hasLocation W15787617921 @default.
• W1578761792 hasOpenAccess W1578761792 @default.
• W1578761792 hasPrimaryLocation W15787617921 @default.
• W1578761792 hasRelatedWork W2016717044 @default.
• W1578761792 hasRelatedWork W2335449667 @default.
• W1578761792 hasRelatedWork W2394306283 @default.
• W1578761792 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W1578761792 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W1578761792 hasRelatedWork W379073799 @default.
• W1578761792 hasRelatedWork W4234480004 @default.
• W1578761792 hasRelatedWork W4236210896 @default.
• W1578761792 hasRelatedWork W578832185 @default.
• W1578761792 hasRelatedWork W637970887 @default.
• W1578761792 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1578761792 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1578761792 magId "1578761792" @default.
• W1578761792 workType "book-chapter" @default.