FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1584330195> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1584330195 abstract "RESEARCH QUESTIONS -- Lay the foundations for a new Science of Arts: 1. How do we measure how great a work of art is long before history makes its judgement? Can we and how can we predict the greatness of a work of art? 2. How do we specify changes in any existing work of art that actually succeed in increasing its greatness and historic impact? 3. How do we measure the degree to which particular lives lack essential levels of art? What levels of art are essential for healthy good lives? What levels of lack of art lead lives into disarray or suffering? 4. How do we measure the healthiness of the amount, quality, and type of art in a society in terms of its actual delivered care/service to those people? This paper tests a hypothesis -- that if we examine the functions actual works of art perform in actual lives greatly helped or impacted by art -- we find that artworks that deliver more such art functions than others end up being judged by history as “greater”. This somewhat counters past research by Watts, Salganik, and Dodds showing that random chance makes some songs popular and others not but they concentrated on immediate popularity in commercial markets while this paper’s research seeks to lay a foundation for historic long term levels of popularity instead.METHOD -- Ask suppliers and customers of great art what functions they get/provide with it. 1. Nominate great artists and ask them what functions they produce or get from great artworks. 2. Nominate people as greatly impacted/helped by art and ask them what functions they got from great artworks. 3. Combine results from one and two above and categorize fractionally to produce a fractal concept model of functions of great art experiences/works. 4. Use the model thus produced to test the hypothesis that artworks that deliver more of the functions on that model are judged by history as greater than competing works. This paper presents survey research to inductively define functions shared by many works of art in diverse fields.THE SAMPLE -- A stratified sample of artists from 63 different arts and a stratified sample of highly effective, educated, or creative people from 63 different parts of society were interviewed, functions that arts delivered to their lives that they mentioned were grouped, groups named, groups grouped, such super-groups named, and so on. The resulting hierarchical model was then regularized by branch factor and principle of ordering to produce what is called a “fractal concept model”, the result of this study, of 64 functions of all arts.USES OF THE MODEL PRODUCED -- Later research will use this model to: 1) measure the greatness of any particular work of art or art type by how much of how many functions it delivers (is music “greater” in functions produced than painting, say); 2) measure how much of how many of these functions more effective, more educated, and more creative people have than people less so have (to link presence of all or some particular subsets of these functions with greatness of life of persons overall); 3) design greatness into particular works by broadening and deepening the number of such functions produced by encountering the work, 4) guide investment in works of art via choosing ones capable of greatness measured by how much of how many of these functions are produced in those encountering it, 5) guide composition and commercialization of movie scripts by optimizing which functions and how much of how many functions they produce in people encountering them; 6) to measure the “artfulness” or “artlessness” of entire organizations and societies via how little of how many functions they have established in people’s lives. ULTIMATE GOAL -- The ultimate goal is to produce something like a “science of arts” that finds functions nothing else in society effects in people’s lives as well as particular arts do, relating those functions to what makes lives great, so we ultimately can prescribe arts to fix lives and propel them towards greatness, as well as quantify the cost of centralizations, commercializations, monopolizations, extremizations of arts in modern industrial societies. While it is easy to assert, especially if no effort to confirm with data is made, that there are millions of possible interpretations of any work of art, when actual artists and high performer people are asked what functions arts effect in their lives and work,quite specific, non-infinite results obtain.RESULTS -- The Beginning Foundations for a new Science of Arts -- A model of the 64 functions basic to all arts (plus two ancillary models developed in process -- one of art creation processes across various arts and another of computational art traits and dynamics) This paper’s research presents a well ordered model of 64 functions that all arts effect, to some extent, and that nothing else in society effects as well as the arts." @default.
• W1584330195 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1584330195 creator A5068129813 @default.
• W1584330195 date "2009-03-01" @default.
• W1584330195 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W1584330195 title "64 Purposes of All Arts -- Toward a Science of Arts: Using Number and Depth of Purposes Covered to Measure How Great a Work is, to Prescribe the Type and Amount of Art that People (Individuals and Groups) Need to Achieve Their Goals in Life, and to Systematically Compose Works of Art Capable of Greatness" @default.
• W1584330195 cites W135979475 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1500586530 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1514209950 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1521480639 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1521891762 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1537658697 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1560857487 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1564591897 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1577430497 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1584155996 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1601278799 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1604573692 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1606840060 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1945580379 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1979570086 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W1994199933 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W2025244615 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W2055163968 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W2251769748 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W226913955 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W2318733504 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W2320396155 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W2798529387 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W2798977449 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W3011506453 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W318310530 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W398686886 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W560654861 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W563257446 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W633127293 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W63992797 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W644837422 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W646661731 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W651982663 @default.
• W1584330195 cites W97587491 @default.
• W1584330195 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W1584330195 type Work @default.
• W1584330195 sameAs 1584330195 @default.
• W1584330195 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1584330195 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1584330195 hasAuthorship W1584330195A5068129813 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C2776548248 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C2780586970 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C2780966255 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C70789860 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C81939152 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConcept C94389720 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C107038049 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C124952713 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C127413603 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C142362112 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C153349607 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C17744445 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C18762648 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C199539241 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C2776548248 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C2780586970 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C2780966255 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C70789860 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C78519656 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C81939152 @default.
• W1584330195 hasConceptScore W1584330195C94389720 @default.
• W1584330195 hasLocation W15843301951 @default.
• W1584330195 hasOpenAccess W1584330195 @default.
• W1584330195 hasPrimaryLocation W15843301951 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W150399095 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W1578625127 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W190135870 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W1970711512 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W1985459864 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W1997261152 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W2032379568 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W2140211015 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W2218037319 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W2338698130 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W2353099284 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W2396534659 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W248470317 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W2496187959 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W2891768911 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W313958916 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W778775251 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W11547846 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W2206883500 @default.
• W1584330195 hasRelatedWork W329045888 @default.

• next