FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1587629666> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1587629666 endingPage "249" @default.
• W1587629666 startingPage "244" @default.
• W1587629666 abstract "Background: The endotracheal intubation (ETT) is the critical airway management in life saving, but major complications, such as esophageal intubation or difficult intubation, may be occurred. The esophageal tracheal Combitube TM (ETC), a combined endotracheal and esophageal obturator airway adjunct can be prevented these problems. Objective: To evaluate the ability of anesthetic nurse trainees to use the ETT and ETC, on the manikin. Design: An experimental study to evaluate the difficult of insertion, recognition of esophageal versus tracheal placement, skill proficiency and satisfaction. The ability to use the device in cases of failed endotracheal intubation also was scrutinized. Setting: Department of anesthesiology, Srinagarind hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Subjective: Twenty inexperienced anesthetic nurse trainees, who study in department of anesthesiology for 1 year (1 October 1999 to 30 September 2000). Measurement: The study is separated into 2 periods of time. The first one is on the first day of the training course in the department and the later is on the next 3 months. 1).The intubation time was defined as the time from the preparation of the instruments to the beginning of the intubation until the lungs were inflated and 2).The satisfaction and degree of difficulty for using Combitube TM by using the questionnaires. Result: Comparing the both periods of the study to intubation the ETT and the ETC, the study showed that the time for ETT intubation was 29.07 second (95%CI, 16.29,41.94), it showed that there was statistically different as was the degree of difficulty for intubation (both p-value < 0.05). The second period showed that the second intubation was easier than the first one. The time for ETC between both periods were not statistically significant different, however, the within degree of difficulty. The degree of satisfaction vis-a-vis of the two methods between the both periods were not statistically different. Conclusion: Although visualized endotracheal intubation remains the preferred method of airway control, the Combitube TM may be an effective emergency and prehospital airway device as both a back up to endotracheal tube and a primary airway. The Combitube TM dose not require visualization with a laryngoscope, comprehensive training and continuing education on key factors affecting skill retention. We concluded that training ETC intubation by anesthetic nurses (both trainees and those in intensive care) and paramedics would be more successful as well as the older ETT method." @default.
• W1587629666 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1587629666 creator A5019393307 @default.
• W1587629666 creator A5069312803 @default.
• W1587629666 creator A5083401252 @default.
• W1587629666 date "2000-01-01" @default.
• W1587629666 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1587629666 title "Comparing the Ability of Anesthetic Nurse Trainees to Intubate Using the CombitubeTM VS. Endotracheal Tube" @default.
• W1587629666 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W1587629666 type Work @default.
• W1587629666 sameAs 1587629666 @default.
• W1587629666 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1587629666 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1587629666 hasAuthorship W1587629666A5019393307 @default.
• W1587629666 hasAuthorship W1587629666A5069312803 @default.
• W1587629666 hasAuthorship W1587629666A5083401252 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConcept C105922876 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConcept C2779526319 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConcept C2780978852 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConcept C2910663819 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConcept C2991710064 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConcept C3019038464 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConceptScore W1587629666C105922876 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConceptScore W1587629666C2778716859 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConceptScore W1587629666C2779526319 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConceptScore W1587629666C2780978852 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConceptScore W1587629666C2910663819 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConceptScore W1587629666C2991710064 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConceptScore W1587629666C3019038464 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConceptScore W1587629666C42219234 @default.
• W1587629666 hasConceptScore W1587629666C71924100 @default.
• W1587629666 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1587629666 hasLocation W15876296661 @default.
• W1587629666 hasOpenAccess W1587629666 @default.
• W1587629666 hasPrimaryLocation W15876296661 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W1971551578 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W1979834280 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W1981982294 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W2065635098 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W2158758630 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W2187068831 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W2333630971 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W2411142730 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W2429313918 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W2517911008 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W2534253167 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W2605766317 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W2790034368 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W2810584939 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W3030094527 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W3036769211 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W3136715614 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W3184569121 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W3204544340 @default.
• W1587629666 hasRelatedWork W3207995692 @default.
• W1587629666 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W1587629666 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1587629666 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1587629666 magId "1587629666" @default.
• W1587629666 workType "article" @default.