FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1589773238> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1589773238 abstract "Abstract Nowadays, more and more universities are choosing to use technological platforms to administer educational processes and to facilitate the administrative tasks that students have to fulfill. However, these changes have consequences and can generate numerous difficulties with implementation as well as student resistance. At a Belgian university that confronted such problems, an observatory of students’ uses of computer-based tools was created. This observatory has multiple missions: to characterize actual students’ use of a learning management system, to identify satisfaction factors, and to provide recommendations in order to improve the user experience. To achieve these missions and to be consistent with the current research in the field of technology acceptance, several methodologies (focus groups, usability tests, and online surveys) are used. In this article, special attention is given to users’ characteristics with regard to information and communication technology (ICT) usage and to the technology acceptance model proposed by Wixom and Todd (2005). This model is particularly relevant in the case of an observatory studying learning management systems, satisfaction, and technology acceptance. Indeed, it combines two major approaches of technology use: the satisfaction approach and social acceptance of technology approach. Moreover, it has the advantage of putting forward the distinction between the system that ICT departments control and the information that other university departments have released on the system. The results showed that the students mentioned having good competence in the use of ICT tools and that the usability difficulties they encountered and dissatisfactions they expressed can be attributed primarily to the system used and secondarily to the information presented on this system. Both factors negatively influence the intention of using the system. More precisely, regression analysis indicated that reliability, flexibility, integration, aesthetics, and available features influence the perceived system quality, while completeness, accuracy, relevance, comprehensibility, and currency of the information presented on the system influence the perceived information quality. The creation of such an observatory allows one to simultaneously study users’ acceptance and satisfaction, to differentiate the impact of personal and technical factors, and to consider the evaluation processes of technological usage at the university." @default.
• W1589773238 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1589773238 creator A5024306310 @default.
• W1589773238 creator A5053122482 @default.
• W1589773238 date "2015-06-01" @default.
• W1589773238 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W1589773238 title "Observatory of students’ uses of computer-based tools" @default.
• W1589773238 cites W1559924042 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W1791587663 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W1949010165 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W1963520761 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W1968683406 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W1979929841 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W1985042980 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W1998581510 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2013530657 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2020573370 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2028184439 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2058046107 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2069399659 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2086781562 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2088712636 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2099697766 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2100379340 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2103472024 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2104971230 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2112042732 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2118528790 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2168569455 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2169737976 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W2276049535 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W3125976894 @default.
• W1589773238 cites W4237826058 @default.
• W1589773238 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2015.02.002" @default.
• W1589773238 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1589773238 type Work @default.
• W1589773238 sameAs 1589773238 @default.
• W1589773238 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W1589773238 countsByYear W15897732382017 @default.
• W1589773238 countsByYear W15897732382018 @default.
• W1589773238 countsByYear W15897732382019 @default.
• W1589773238 countsByYear W15897732382021 @default.
• W1589773238 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1589773238 hasAuthorship W1589773238A5024306310 @default.
• W1589773238 hasAuthorship W1589773238A5053122482 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C121017731 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C2776185967 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C2779919027 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C44870925 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C67363961 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C100521375 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C107457646 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C111919701 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C121017731 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C121332964 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C136764020 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C15744967 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C170130773 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C2776185967 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C2779919027 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C41008148 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C44870925 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C56739046 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C67363961 @default.
• W1589773238 hasConceptScore W1589773238C77805123 @default.
• W1589773238 hasLocation W15897732381 @default.
• W1589773238 hasOpenAccess W1589773238 @default.
• W1589773238 hasPrimaryLocation W15897732381 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W126971853 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W1486370625 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W1496780706 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W2032072274 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W2066348923 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W2088208017 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W2116951053 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W2119184665 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W2130438383 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W2273659685 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W2578620075 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W2740850826 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W27552794 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W280694273 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W2809277750 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W2971696289 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W3137026267 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W3176165586 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W3178293274 @default.
• W1589773238 hasRelatedWork W3189871614 @default.
• W1589773238 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1589773238 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next