FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1590052503> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1590052503 abstract "The results of the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in Australian tertiary institutions have been available for a number of years and have provided the administration of these institutions with valuable information as to students’ perceptions of their courses. In addition to the CEQ, all of these institutions survey their students at the subject level. The purpose of this study has been to determine the degree to which the responses recorded on these subject level Teaching Quality Indicators (TQI) are related to the CEQ. In the analysis, we have used two approaches to cast some light on the degree to which the responses on the TQI can be used to anticipate and establish responses on the subsequent CEQ.Prior to performing these studies, we first sampled the extensive literature that describes influences on responses to TQIs. From this survey, we found that there are many factors which influence students’ responses, other than a specific lecturer’s performance in class. We have used the literature on the TQIs because there is almost no literature concerning students’ responses to course level surveys such as the CEQ. Nonetheless we have used the results of this survey to determine how we can control for these factors when modeling responses to the CEQ.There were two major hurdles which needed to be addressed in the performance of this analysis across institutions. First, there is no consistent TQI for all institutions. Most of these surveys have been assembled using questions with different origins that have varied over time and that are individual to each institution. Secondly, even if the TQIs were constant and consistent across all institutions, it would be necessary to account for any other factors, such as the year level and the field of study, that may influence the specific subject TQIs and the overall course evaluation. Our first analysis addresses, in a systematic manner, the first difficulty by investigating the nature of the TQIs in use in Australian tertiary institutions. Through the use of a website designed as a clearing house for information on these surveys, we have collected examples of the TQIs from 39 higher education institutions in Australia. We then categorised these different instruments to develop a composite new TQI survey that captures the characteristics of those in use.Using the new TQI, we then compared the responses of students at the four participating institutions (Flinders, Melbourne, Tasmania, and Wollongong). The students were asked to respond to a survey that included questions relating to teaching, generic skills and overall course satisfaction (from the CEQ), questions from the local TQI, and questions from the new TQI based on the composite question types found in our analysis of all Australian TQIs. We found that few of the institution-specific TQI’s elicited responses that matched the CEQ and that even the new TQI did not provide many solid matches. Thus we concluded that, in most cases, the items on the TQI and the CEQ are measuring different factors.For the CEQ responses from The University of Melbourne, we matched the students’ experiences in order to determine the degree to which their responses could have been anticipated. From this analysis we found that those students who completed the CEQ were most responsive to situations where their expectations are not met. We also found that characteristics of subjects that influence TQI responses are also factors that influence CEQ responses. We found that older students, those that receive higher marks than their peers, and those who study full-time in their last year, are more likely to rate a course more highly. Whilst students who take more than one course, who are in subjects with higher than average enrollments, and that received lower than average TQI ratings, are less likely to rate their course highly.The conclusion from this study is that TQIs at different institutions are not designed in a consistent manner and that only a small portion of the CEQ responses could be predicted by these TQI. However, just as with the studies of the TQIs, we can establish that course characteristics such as: the level of the degree, the Faculty and Department in which the course was taken, the course description, the industry and duties of those who have found employment after completing their course, all strongly influence the CEQ." @default.
• W1590052503 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1590052503 creator A5000195995 @default.
• W1590052503 creator A5040300230 @default.
• W1590052503 creator A5056670873 @default.
• W1590052503 creator A5080070083 @default.
• W1590052503 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W1590052503 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W1590052503 title "Measuring Student Experience: Relationships between Teaching Quality Instruments (TQI and Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)" @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1493454437 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1520036406 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1540729798 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1562364832 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1568967066 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1571492976 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1576331784 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1590052503 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1599880169 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1908126099 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1928627382 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1964560776 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1965553058 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1965686167 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1967103901 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1967312804 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1973977909 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1975763620 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1976018174 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1992689066 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1992839398 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W1993719478 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2004349687 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2008593016 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2010174036 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2013650117 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2014954365 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2019288716 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2022724900 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2025188170 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2029973786 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2030126533 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2032139148 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2032740066 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2033478246 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2036557960 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2039325221 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2039942923 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2040731539 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2041379578 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2044070905 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2044606069 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2046131241 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2051162681 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2054736352 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2056924304 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2061820197 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2065430410 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2066385410 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2067937224 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2068515704 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2070075818 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2072051883 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2072151027 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2073069202 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2075253532 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2079500588 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2081137090 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2090404619 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2092012601 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2093099429 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2095323930 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2107979760 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2115085565 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2121224052 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2126940482 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2132784817 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2135674522 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2140424736 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2141960018 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2146085743 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2147119795 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2152966935 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2162643075 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2170003695 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W2607881501 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W3121308500 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W3121673298 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W41709212 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W4229519297 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W4238637322 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W4239319867 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W4239355817 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W4241875864 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W4241977680 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W4242811302 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W4248044124 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W4256712509 @default.
• W1590052503 cites W51550268 @default.
• W1590052503 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2563326" @default.
• W1590052503 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.

• next