FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1597160104> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1597160104 abstract "The first amendment has long a complex and interwoven range of individual interests. Protected freedoms often involve expressive activities - religion, speech, the press, assembly, and association. The first amendment also protects an individual's freedom to refrain from expressive activity.Two distinct kinds of liberty interest support the right to refrain from expressive activity. First, individuals have an interest in not being forced to reveal information about personal beliefs or associations. Such a claim may arise in a variety of contexts: a reporter may not wish to reveal the identity of news sources for fear of discouraging future revelations; a public school teacher may not wish to reveal all organizations to which that teacher has belonged for fear of community hostility or loss of employment; or a litigant may seek to prevent of trade secrets or other private information through the discovery process. As a group, these cases are rightfully viewed as disclosure cases.Second, individuals have an interest in not being forced to belong to any organization or to make any statements when they would rather be silent or express different views. Within this category fall the claims of schoolchildren compelled to recite the pledge of allegiance in violation of their own religious or political views, of school teachers compelled to sign an oath of loyalty to the Constitution as a condition of employment, and of nonunion employees forced to pay service fees to support union activities with which they disagree. As a group, the constitutional obligations asserted in these three situations can be described as claims based on a first amendment protection for intellectual individualism. This Article focuses on the second group of protected silence interests. It traces the history and development of such claims in the jurisprudence of the first amendment through decades of sporadic Supreme Court attention. The Article explores how this distinct branch of first amendment doctrine relates to core free speech concepts and whether it is, as some have argued, a separate species appealing to a different range of interests than traditional free speech claims, or, instead, a part of traditional first amendment doctrine appealing to those same values. The Article then discusses the development of the protection against compelled expression in Supreme Court decisions in the 1970s and early 1980s. The aim of this inquiry is to determine whether later cases, taken together with earlier decisions, present a consistent and coherent doctrinal picture. To the extent that the later cases suggest the Court has taken a new turning - either consciously or inadvertently - the values motivating this doctrinal shift in focus are identified. The Article goes on to address cases from the 1983-1985 Supreme Court Terms to evaluate whether the Court has found a methodologically consistent and doctrinally sound analysis.Finally, the Article concludes with a suggested judicial analysis for cases of this type. The proposed approach accommodates mainstream first amendment doctrine in analyzing claims of interference with the freedom from compelled expression or association." @default.
• W1597160104 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1597160104 creator A5016866611 @default.
• W1597160104 date "1986-01-01" @default.
• W1597160104 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W1597160104 title "Justice Jackson's Flag Salute Legacy: The Supreme Court Struggles to Protect Intellectual Individualism" @default.
• W1597160104 hasPublicationYear "1986" @default.
• W1597160104 type Work @default.
• W1597160104 sameAs 1597160104 @default.
• W1597160104 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1597160104 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W1597160104 hasAuthorship W1597160104A5016866611 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConcept C2780295577 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConceptScore W1597160104C144024400 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConceptScore W1597160104C17744445 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConceptScore W1597160104C199539241 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConceptScore W1597160104C2776154427 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConceptScore W1597160104C2778272461 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConceptScore W1597160104C2780295577 @default.
• W1597160104 hasConceptScore W1597160104C94625758 @default.
• W1597160104 hasLocation W15971601041 @default.
• W1597160104 hasOpenAccess W1597160104 @default.
• W1597160104 hasPrimaryLocation W15971601041 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W1558738505 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W1576771245 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W1826667888 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W2030319146 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W2241256560 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W2266650228 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W2284652353 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W254035798 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W2899658956 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W2938044746 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W3121706567 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W3121839303 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W3122307738 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W3123418015 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W3124541260 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W31731050 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W3209810800 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W333227849 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W55637809 @default.
• W1597160104 hasRelatedWork W1500976609 @default.
• W1597160104 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1597160104 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1597160104 magId "1597160104" @default.
• W1597160104 workType "article" @default.