FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1597175684> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1597175684 startingPage "5" @default.
• W1597175684 abstract "Abstract The National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) solicited responses from a variety of stakeholders to identify ways in which federal policy could be reformed to enhance innovation. The Society of Research Administrators International (SRA) responded to this initiative and identified the following specific priority areas for reform: the peer review process, finding for graduate research, evaluation of federally funded research, support for the research infrastructure, federal partnerships programs, mechanisms for addressing complex (multi-discipline and/or cross-sector) innovations, and accounting principles for RD academia; non-profits; and state, local and federal governments. Several potential areas for reform were identified and respondents were asked to identify specific priority areas, the types of reform that should be implemented and a timeframe for implementation. The following paper describes SRA's specific recommendations to the CT along with the Society's justification for each area of reform. Nature of the Peer Review Process Numerous agencies have reviewed their own peer review process and the General Accounting Office (GAO) spent many months reviewing the entire federal review process. Although the current system is still considered the best for evaluating funding proposals, it is not perfect. SRA noted the following real or perceived problems in the existing peer review system: * The review process is unduly influenced by biases for and against certain theoretical frameworks, methodologies, investigators and institutions. * Innovative theories and novel approaches and models are more often ranked lower than conservative and familiar options. * Reviewers have the unfair advantage of seeing new advances and may give lower scores to competitors. * The peer review process is too lengthy, generally taking from several months to a year before funding is approved. * In general, only incremental advances are funded and even the edge projects tend to be extremely conservative. To eliminate such problems, federal agencies need to adopt the philosophy that is a critical factor in the peer review process and include as one of the review criteria for determining a proposal's success. Moreover, the term innovation needs to be redefined as something that is truly cutting edge, not merely an incremental advance in the status quo. The difficulty with is that novel ideas tend to be associated with a high rate of failure, something our legislative bodies and the general public seldom tolerate. The National Science Foundation (NSF) has a program, called Small Grants for Exploratory Research, that bypasses the peer review process and has a very short turn around time. This program should be looked at as a basic model for encouraging innovation. However, if a peer review component is needed, it is critical to keep the time, from submission to funding, short to retain the innovative nature of the program. …" @default.
• W1597175684 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1597175684 creator A5008146514 @default.
• W1597175684 creator A5080350699 @default.
• W1597175684 creator A5091501240 @default.
• W1597175684 date "2001-01-01" @default.
• W1597175684 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1597175684 title "Priorities for Federal Innovation Reform: A SRA Perspective" @default.
• W1597175684 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W1597175684 type Work @default.
• W1597175684 sameAs 1597175684 @default.
• W1597175684 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W1597175684 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1597175684 hasAuthorship W1597175684A5008146514 @default.
• W1597175684 hasAuthorship W1597175684A5080350699 @default.
• W1597175684 hasAuthorship W1597175684A5091501240 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConcept C136197465 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConcept C138368954 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConceptScore W1597175684C111919701 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConceptScore W1597175684C136197465 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConceptScore W1597175684C138368954 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConceptScore W1597175684C144133560 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConceptScore W1597175684C154945302 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConceptScore W1597175684C17744445 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConceptScore W1597175684C199539241 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConceptScore W1597175684C3116431 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConceptScore W1597175684C39549134 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConceptScore W1597175684C41008148 @default.
• W1597175684 hasConceptScore W1597175684C98045186 @default.
• W1597175684 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1597175684 hasLocation W15971756841 @default.
• W1597175684 hasOpenAccess W1597175684 @default.
• W1597175684 hasPrimaryLocation W15971756841 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W136068218 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W1509721682 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W1553726852 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W1599271548 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W2013386604 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W208266864 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W2181952703 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W2184559333 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W2335993499 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W233754876 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W2419357529 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W2774935999 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W2808695277 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W2891300428 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W2949018293 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W307768475 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W613965946 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W1848588466 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W212562804 @default.
• W1597175684 hasRelatedWork W282168275 @default.
• W1597175684 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W1597175684 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1597175684 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1597175684 magId "1597175684" @default.
• W1597175684 workType "article" @default.