FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W15978121> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W15978121 abstract "The thesis starts with the theoretical framework of the research work (Chapter 1). First, the studies that have investigated the relationship between conceptual change learning and text comprehension are introduced, as well as the two models of text comprehension that are particularly relevant to learning from the refutation text, the Construction-Integration (C-I) Model (Kintsch, 1988) and the Landscape Model (van den Broek, Risden, Fletcher, & Thurlow, 1996). Then, recent research that has dealt with the specific processing of refutation text (e.g., Kendeou & van den Broek, 2007) is reviewed. Finally, I described the use of eye movements in reading research, explaining how they represent an effective methodology to tap into the moment-to-moment online comprehension processes at discourse level (Hyona, Lorch, & Rinck, 2003). Following, four studies are extensively presented (Chapters 2-5). The first was a study in which the usefulness and reliability of the eye-tracking methodology was tested, and initial evidence has been collected (Chapter 2). Findings from this study suggested that the refutation text assists readers to activate their current conceptions during the initial text processing. A conceptual conflict may be perceived during refutation text reading (van den Broek & Kendeou, 2008), requiring an intentional cognitive effort to be resolved (Sinatra & Pintrich, 2003). Finally, learning from the refutation text was positively related to strategic reading: the quality, not the quantity, of reading is entailed in deep text comprehension. In other words, it is crucial how the reading time is spent.The second study has addressed the issue of whether the refutation text effect encompasses a series of sub-processes with different time courses (the “when” of the effect), taking place on different parts of the text (the “where” of the effect) and at different stages of reading (Chapter 3). This study provided evidence that the refutation text effect is not monolithic; rather, it represents a composite effect comprehending sub-processes that take place in different parts of the text and at different stages of reading.The third study has investigated the relationship between the refutation text effect and text processing during repeated exposure with text information. The aim of this study was to reveal that the refutation nature of a text alters the well-established (Hyona & Niemi, 1990; Hyona, 1995; Raney & Rayner, 1993, 1995) pattern of processing during repeated reading (Chapter 4). This study particularly showed that repetition benefits are, at least in part, strategic in nature.Finally, the fourth study has been focused on the readers’ verbal working memory capacity (Burton & Daneman, 2007; Daneman & Carpenter, 1980). Specifically, it has investigated, on the one hand, whether the effectiveness of the refutation text in promoting a stronger conceptual change would be different in readers with diverse working memory capacity (lower- and higher-span readers); on the other hand, whether refutation text processing at discourse level would vary as a function of the readers’ working memory capacity (Chapter 5). Findings from this study showed that the refutation text effect is mainly related to the co-activation (Kendeou & van den Broek, 2007) of incorrect and correct conceptions about the examined phenomenon. The refutation text also facilitates the processing of text information for both lower- and higher-span readers. Readers with a lower working memory capacity span learn more when interacting with the refutation text rather than with the standard one.The thesis concludes with a final chapter (Chapter 6), which presents a general discussion of the findings emerged across the studies and indicates some potential future direction of the research." @default.
• W15978121 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W15978121 creator A5068833309 @default.
• W15978121 date "2012-01-27" @default.
• W15978121 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W15978121 title "From Eye Fixations to Scientific Conceptual Learning: A Process Approach to the Refutation Text Effect" @default.
• W15978121 cites W137612914 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1513195463 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1533249100 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1547000652 @default.
• W15978121 cites W156013741 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1564672749 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1587094587 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1593690745 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1594369375 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1598120065 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1674947250 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1963516172 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1968199915 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1969288146 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1975847479 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1976193044 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1980557240 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1980844137 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1988809324 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1989570472 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1989748540 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1990854045 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1993262000 @default.
• W15978121 cites W1997668937 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2000497652 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2000956526 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2001467963 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2001916427 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2002083454 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2004749630 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2009295735 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2011826874 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2013112874 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2023584795 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2024773874 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2028131103 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2032770031 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2033703136 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2035361838 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2036856833 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2044333535 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2046823375 @default.
• W15978121 cites W20480043 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2050948888 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2052447448 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2052677169 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2053468515 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2055736429 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2056498715 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2058381271 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2059086756 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2063578082 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2064660172 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2076138939 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2080330405 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2081541535 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2082622970 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2084015864 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2086254612 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2087172045 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2087860413 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2088022421 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2089221954 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2090984936 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2094781887 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2098133971 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2105019520 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2110733351 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2113669731 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2114944997 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2118178444 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2125776191 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2125872540 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2135588545 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2142450587 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2145827992 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2148230310 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2153076044 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2153521879 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2153905532 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2156964236 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2160409741 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2161696066 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2165104209 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2166792455 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2170516194 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2170521467 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2171120894 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2183114166 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2242376933 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2245398942 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2246525924 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2303285637 @default.
• W15978121 cites W2437494323 @default.

• next