Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1601987685> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 69 of
69
with 100 items per page.
- W1601987685 abstract "How does a U.S. court of appeals deal with a Supreme Court intervention into its ongoing work? A law-changing ruling affects not only the immediate parties but also many factually similar or related cases, and the affected court must cope with the situation. Mandates in recently-decided cases may have to be recalled and outcomes altered or cases remanded for further proceedings, and these effects expand if the justices then GVR other cases. The affected court will also incorporate the ruling into its new decisions and may choose one or more of many cases as vehicles to decide open questions. With multiple panels facing the same or similar issues, the court may act en banc to avoid inconsistent results. During this time, the Supreme Court may decide other cases posing follow-on questions, with the lower court perhaps suspending action until the justices have ruled. All of this makes interaction between the court of appeals and the Supreme Court quite dynamic. Using documents from casefiles in the papers of a senior U.S. court of appeals judge, the paper examines such dynamic interaction in the aftermath of Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (1973) (warrantless search by roving patrol away from the border not statutorily authorized border search and is Fourth Amendment violation), as that ruling affected many recently-decided or pending appeals from criminal convictions stemming from searches of varying degrees of intrusiveness, at or near the border, at fixed (permanent or temporary) checkpoints or by roving patrols. The Ninth Circuit not only had to cope with fast-developing Fourth Amendment law but it also faced how to apply the uncertain law of retroactivity to convictions on appeal when Almeida-Sanchez was decided. In addition to the story that is told here, various elements of interaction between the court of appeals and the Supreme Court are specified. Especially important is that the court of appeals, in anticipatory deference, held cases for Supreme Court decisions so the court of appeals could then attempt to fall in line." @default.
- W1601987685 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W1601987685 creator A5005574806 @default.
- W1601987685 date "2010-01-01" @default.
- W1601987685 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W1601987685 title "Court of Appeals Dynamics in the Aftermath of a Supreme Court Ruling" @default.
- W1601987685 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
- W1601987685 type Work @default.
- W1601987685 sameAs 1601987685 @default.
- W1601987685 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W1601987685 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W1601987685 hasAuthorship W1601987685A5005574806 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C136576888 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C24890656 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C2776244770 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C2779932750 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C2781390367 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C50688660 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C66487177 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C69775031 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConcept C87501996 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C121332964 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C136576888 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C15744967 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C17744445 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C199539241 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C24890656 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C2776244770 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C2778272461 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C2779932750 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C2781390367 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C50688660 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C66487177 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C69775031 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C77805123 @default.
- W1601987685 hasConceptScore W1601987685C87501996 @default.
- W1601987685 hasLocation W16019876851 @default.
- W1601987685 hasOpenAccess W1601987685 @default.
- W1601987685 hasPrimaryLocation W16019876851 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W1506827424 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W1563467665 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W1589621658 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W220086594 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W2209679808 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W243435163 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W2744925951 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W2945948202 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W3125408551 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W3125875982 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W332391311 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W807526284 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W83076801 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W840083088 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W853427604 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W862725663 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W172940862 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W1831315329 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W2599155037 @default.
- W1601987685 hasRelatedWork W3129898730 @default.
- W1601987685 isParatext "false" @default.
- W1601987685 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W1601987685 magId "1601987685" @default.
- W1601987685 workType "article" @default.