FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W160493003> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W160493003 endingPage "63" @default.
• W160493003 startingPage "653" @default.
• W160493003 abstract "The implementation of new diagnostic and therapeutic technologies is related to expanding financial needs. The escalation of expenses for health protection and simultaneous economic problems has resulted in an interest in the subject of economic assessment. Decision makers in the health sector should have reasonable tools that will allow them to make complex evaluations of the economic suitability of health technologies. Economic analysis should also prove that launching new procedures can save money. Numerous studies indicate that chronic pain and psycho-sociological variables lead to a worse quality of life. Chronic pain issues are a major public health problem, by virtue of the difficulties in efficient therapy and the social costs reflected in incapability of work and disability. Spinal cord stimulation is the most efficacious procedure in the treatment of chronic pain.The aim of the study was to estimate the costs of treatment of 37 patients suffering from refractory angina pectoris and neuropathic pain who underwent SCS surgery between 2002 and 2008 in the Neurosurgery Clinic of the 10th Military Hospital in Bydgoszcz in the period of two years before and two years after spinal cord stimulation. The authors also assessed quality of life, using the SF 36 questionnaire, and degree of pain using VAS.The issue was examined with a cost-benefit analysis. Cost was understood as the expenses made two years before and two years after the SCS procedure. The benefits were health care expenses saved by implementation of the SCS procedure. All the costs included in both alternative treatment techniques in a period of 5 years underwent a discounting procedure. The authors also included the price of the neurostimulator under a sensitivity analysis. To assess the quality of life before and after the SCS procedure, a SF 36 questionnaire was used, and to assess the level of pain before and after the SCS procedure, the VAS scale.The costs of treatment of refractory angina pectoris and neuropathic pain are lower when using spinal cord stimulation. In the case of refractory angina pectoris, savings reached 46% whereas in the case of neuropathic pain, 13.2%. The costs of the purchase of the device returned in three years for angina pectoris and seven years for neuropathic pain. SCS in both cases brought a reduction of the level of pain and an improvement to quality of life.SCS in both neuropathic pain and refractory angina pectoris is a procedure that brings benefits in the form of savings. After using SCS in both cases, the quality of life improved and the level of pain was reduced." @default.
• W160493003 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W160493003 creator A5011205176 @default.
• W160493003 creator A5028462981 @default.
• W160493003 creator A5041310288 @default.
• W160493003 creator A5049086169 @default.
• W160493003 creator A5053996985 @default.
• W160493003 creator A5087912139 @default.
• W160493003 date "2013-01-30" @default.
• W160493003 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W160493003 title "Assessment of economic effectiveness in treatment of neuropathic pain and refractory angina pectoris using spinal cord stimulation." @default.
• W160493003 cites W1979390887 @default.
• W160493003 cites W2014779151 @default.
• W160493003 cites W2087687491 @default.
• W160493003 cites W2411273257 @default.
• W160493003 cites W2571631247 @default.
• W160493003 cites W2593358464 @default.
• W160493003 cites W2903963329 @default.
• W160493003 cites W264441231 @default.
• W160493003 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23356203" @default.
• W160493003 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W160493003 type Work @default.
• W160493003 sameAs 160493003 @default.
• W160493003 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W160493003 countsByYear W1604930032021 @default.
• W160493003 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W160493003 hasAuthorship W160493003A5011205176 @default.
• W160493003 hasAuthorship W160493003A5028462981 @default.
• W160493003 hasAuthorship W160493003A5041310288 @default.
• W160493003 hasAuthorship W160493003A5049086169 @default.
• W160493003 hasAuthorship W160493003A5053996985 @default.
• W160493003 hasAuthorship W160493003A5087912139 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C2776125615 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C2777107010 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C2778425758 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C2781118164 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C2984781990 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W160493003 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C118552586 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C142724271 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C159110408 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C160735492 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C162324750 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C1862650 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C2776125615 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C2777107010 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C2778425758 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C2779951463 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C2780775167 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C2781118164 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C2984781990 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C42219234 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C500558357 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C50522688 @default.
• W160493003 hasConceptScore W160493003C71924100 @default.
• W160493003 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W160493003 hasLocation W1604930031 @default.
• W160493003 hasOpenAccess W160493003 @default.
• W160493003 hasPrimaryLocation W1604930031 @default.
• W160493003 hasRelatedWork W2040372404 @default.
• W160493003 hasRelatedWork W2164677243 @default.
• W160493003 hasRelatedWork W2185208810 @default.
• W160493003 hasRelatedWork W2417052814 @default.
• W160493003 hasRelatedWork W2765254542 @default.
• W160493003 hasRelatedWork W2804816488 @default.
• W160493003 hasRelatedWork W3140150631 @default.
• W160493003 hasRelatedWork W4236190211 @default.
• W160493003 hasRelatedWork W4253086993 @default.
• W160493003 hasRelatedWork W2186756861 @default.
• W160493003 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W160493003 isParatext "false" @default.
• W160493003 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W160493003 magId "160493003" @default.
• W160493003 workType "article" @default.