FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1606717764> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1606717764 startingPage "71" @default.
• W1606717764 abstract "INTRODUCTION Any adequate analysis of the relationship between globalization and regionalization necessarily requires a fundamental understanding of the worldviews underlying the views expressed with respect to the nature of the relationship between globalization and regionalization. Four general views with respect to the relationship between globalization and regionalization, corresponding to four broad worldviews, are discussed. These four views with respect to the relationship between globalization and regionalization are equally scientific and informative; each looks at the relationship between globalization and regionalization from a certain paradigmatic viewpoint. Social theory can usefully be conceived in terms of four key paradigms: functionalist, interpretive, radical humanist, and radical structuralist. The four paradigms are founded upon different assumptions about the nature of social science and the nature of society. Each generates theories, concepts, and analytical tools which are different from those of other paradigms. Each theory can be related to one of the four broad worldviews. These adhere to different sets of fundamental assumptions about; the nature of science (i.e., the subjective-objective dimension), and the nature of society (i.e., the dimension of regulation-radical change), as in Exhibit 1. (See Burrell and Morgan (1979) for the original work. (Ardalan, 2001, 2003; and Bettner, Robinson, and McGoun, 1994; have used this approach). The aim of this paper not so much to create a new piece of puzzle as it to fit the existing pieces of puzzle together in order to make sense of it. Sections II to V, first, each lays down the foundation by discussing one of the four paradigms. Then, each section presents the relationship between globalization and regionalization from the point of view of the respective paradigm. These different perspectives should be regarded as polar ideal types. The work of certain authors helps to define the logically coherent form of a certain polar ideal type. But, the work of many authors who share more than one perspective located between the poles of the spectrum defined by the polar ideal types. The purpose of this paper not to put people into boxes. It rather to recommend that a satisfactory perspective may draw upon several of the ideal types. Section VI concludes the paper. FUNCTIONALIST PARADIGM The functionalist paradigm assumes that society has a concrete existence and follows certain order. These assumptions lead to the existence of an objective and value-free social science which can produce true explanatory and predictive knowledge of the reality out there. It assumes scientific theories can be assessed objectively by reference to empirical evidence. Scientists do not see any roles for themselves, within the phenomenon which they analyze, through the rigor and technique of the scientific method. It attributes independence to the observer from the observed. That is, an ability to observe is without affecting it. It assumes there are universal standards of science, which determine what constitutes an adequate explanation of what observed. It assumes there are external rules and regulations governing the external world. The goal of scientists to find the orders that prevail within that phenomenon. The functionalist paradigm seeks to provide rational explanations of social affairs and generate regulative sociology. It assumes a continuing order, pattern, and coherence and tries to explain what is. It emphasizes the importance of understanding order, equilibrium and stability in society and the way in which these can be maintained. It concerned with the regulation and control of social affairs. It believes in social engineering as a basis for social reform. The rationality which underlies functionalist science used to explain the rationality of society. Science provides the basis for structuring and ordering the social world, similar to the structure and order in the natural world. …" @default.
• W1606717764 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1606717764 creator A5087426030 @default.
• W1606717764 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W1606717764 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W1606717764 title "Globalization and Regionalization: Four Paradigmatic Views" @default.
• W1606717764 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W1606717764 type Work @default.
• W1606717764 sameAs 1606717764 @default.
• W1606717764 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W1606717764 countsByYear W16067177642015 @default.
• W1606717764 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1606717764 hasAuthorship W1606717764A5087426030 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C118084267 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C153606108 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C2119116 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C33676613 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C111472728 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C118084267 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C138885662 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C144024400 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C153606108 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C162324750 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C17744445 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C199539241 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C202444582 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C2119116 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C33676613 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C33923547 @default.
• W1606717764 hasConceptScore W1606717764C36289849 @default.
• W1606717764 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W1606717764 hasLocation W16067177641 @default.
• W1606717764 hasOpenAccess W1606717764 @default.
• W1606717764 hasPrimaryLocation W16067177641 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W1486347738 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W1491629861 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W1826153594 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W1970888047 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W1983437253 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W2087227805 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W2113755834 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W2151354497 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W2321386854 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W2324213690 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W2503321823 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W251831726 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W2583520903 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W3041461227 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W3089929662 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W54514344 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W643412904 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W1671496544 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W1849779697 @default.
• W1606717764 hasRelatedWork W2131386792 @default.
• W1606717764 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W1606717764 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1606717764 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1606717764 magId "1606717764" @default.
• W1606717764 workType "article" @default.