FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1607192292> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1607192292 startingPage "3" @default.
• W1607192292 abstract "AbstractThis paper is a systematic review of the methodology for person fit research targeted specifically at methodologists in training. I analyze the ways in which researchers in the area of person fit have conducted simulation studies for parametric and nonparametric unidimensional IRT models since the seminal review paper by Meijer and Sijtsma (2001). I specifically review how researchers have operationalized different types of aberrant responding for particular testing conditions in order to compar e these simulation design characteristics with features of the real-life testing situations for which person fit analyses are officially reported. I discuss the alignment between the theoretical and practical work and the implications for future simulation work and guidelines for best practice.Key words: Person fit, systematic review, aberrant responding, item response theory, simulation study, generalizability, experimental design.This paper is situated in the conceptual space of research on person fit, which is one aspect of the comprehensive enterprise of critiquing the alignment of the structure of a particular statistical model with a particular data set using residual-based statistics (Engelhard Jr., 2009). I first analyze the ways in which researchers in the area of person fit have conducted simulation studies in non-parametric (e.g., Sijtsma & Molenaar, 2002; van der Aark, Hemker, & Sijtsma, 2002) and parametric unidimensional item response theory (IRT) (e.g., DeAyala, 2009; Yen & Fitzpatrick, 2006) since the seminal review paper by Meijer and Sijtsma (2001). I then discuss the alignment between the theoretical and practical work and the implications for future simulation work and guidelines for best practice.This paper is primarily intended for methodologists in training but should also prove useful for practitioners who are curious about the statistical foundations for proposed guidelines of best practice. The information in this paper may be of less interest for the relatively few specialists who are already conducting advanced simulation studies in this area. However, it should provide some useful insight into the ways these researchers conduct their work for the many other researchers and practitioners who want to be critical consumers of this work.Simulation studies are designed statistical experiments that can provide reliable scientific evidence about the performance of statistical methods. As noted concisely by Cook and Teo (2011):In evaluating methodologies, simulation studies: (i) provide a cost-effective way to quantify potential performance for a large range of scenarios, spanning different combinations of sample sizes and underlying parameters, (ii) allow average performance to be estimated under repeat Monte Carlo sampling and (iii) facilitate comparison of estimates against the true system underlying the simulations, none of which is really achievable via genuine applications, as gratifying as those are. (p. I)In the context of person fit research, simulation studies are most commonly used to quantify the frequency of type-I and type-II errors and associated power rates under a variety of test design and model misspecification conditions.Researchers who publish in this area clearly make some concerted and thoughtful efforts to summarize findings from simulation studies, especially when they are trying to situate their particular theoretical work within a relevant part of the literature. Thus, I initially started out writing this paper as a more traditional review paper that focused on what researchers had learned about person fit in roughly the last 10 years. However, while reviewing the recent body of work it became quickly clear that there is perhaps a more urgent need to discuss the methodology of simulation research with more scrutiny in order to help methodologists in training understand the kinds of generalizations that can and cannot be made based on this work. …" @default.
• W1607192292 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1607192292 creator A5013639240 @default.
• W1607192292 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W1607192292 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W1607192292 title "A Systematic Review of the Methodology for Person Fit Research in Item Response Theory: Lessons about Generalizability of Inferences from the Design of Simulation Studies" @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1540164127 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1865923095 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1963664937 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1964601404 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1969294646 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1973169083 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1981509716 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1984901075 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1985115987 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1985342600 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1985478439 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1991728049 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1992593817 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1993390327 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1994700698 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1996435388 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W1997995379 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2002017421 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2003521605 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2007350881 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2015901722 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2016227990 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2020839138 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2022614805 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2025186618 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2028162198 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2032147138 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2032577998 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2033582774 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2039270597 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2039334396 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2041831715 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2049020566 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2053971201 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2055682091 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2055728918 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2057847895 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2065122082 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2065579393 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2079101498 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2083574727 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2085747252 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2090753105 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2094872805 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2096020821 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2097027231 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2097672163 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2101707514 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2101923477 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2110515480 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2112011896 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2113948868 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2117221752 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2118318697 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2134570871 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2135698608 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2137880913 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2139480919 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2140869847 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2144233208 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2145815775 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2153219609 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2156407984 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2158518800 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2169517221 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2170081377 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2171677421 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2358151267 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2403558038 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2470036026 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2505213109 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2587037166 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2990355202 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W305168481 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W582385535 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W588309468 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W615644768 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W628329697 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W630284605 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2101284264 @default.
• W1607192292 cites W2524290320 @default.
• W1607192292 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W1607192292 type Work @default.
• W1607192292 sameAs 1607192292 @default.
• W1607192292 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W1607192292 countsByYear W16071922922014 @default.
• W1607192292 countsByYear W16071922922015 @default.
• W1607192292 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1607192292 hasAuthorship W1607192292A5013639240 @default.
• W1607192292 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W1607192292 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1607192292 hasConcept C117251300 @default.
• W1607192292 hasConcept C138496976 @default.

• next