FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W161021606> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W161021606 abstract "Event Abstract Back to Event The impact of visual processing on speech comprehension Vanja Kljajevic1* 1 University of Groningen, Netherlands The role of the processes such as those involved in perception of a visual scene and their impact on sentence comprehension has not been explored to a great extent so far. This is important not only because insights into the dynamic interplay among the grammatical, conceptual and perceptual components may improve our understanding of comprehension processes, but also because of the potential implications that these insights might have in language recovery. Indeed, one of the hallmarks of the current research on aphasic patients' spoken sentence comprehension is that it often neglects the possible impact of visual scenes on auditory comprehension (but see Thompson, 2007), despite the research indicating its relative importance in on-line sentence processing in neurologically intact populations (Tanenhaus, Spivey-Knowlton, Eberhard, & Sedivy, 1995; Knoeferle, Crocker, Scheepers, & Pickering, 2003). For example, Knoeferle et al. (2003) have shown that anticipation of thematic roles is possible in on-line comprehension of sentences with syntactic and thematic ambiguity when depiction of 'agent-action-patient events' is present. Thus, although reliance on auditory processes in sentence comprehension is preferred, a visual scene also provides information that may lead to syntactic and thematic roles disambiguation (Knoeferle & Crocker, 2004). These findings emphasize the impact of interaction between the auditory and visual processes on comprehension of spoken language. The current paper addresses the following questions: Can intact visual processing be employed to improve on-line aphasic comprehension of speech that refers to some element of the visual scene (objects, their relations, actions)? Is across-domain binding of attributes possible before the attributes form what will become a “bound percept” in a particular cognitive component (e.g. vision)? For example, there is evidence that a specific attribute, such as color or motion, is more important in categorization of some objects (fruits when compared to animals in the former, and animate vs. inanimate things in the latter case) (Caramazza & Mahon, 2005). In this paper I argue that due to visual perceptual asynchrony (Zeki, 2003) and temporal distribution of auditory information, it is possible that a cross-domain (visual vs. auditory object, such as a car as an object vs. a word 'car' spoken aloud) between-attributes (color-motion vs. sound-meaning) binding may affect semantic processes involved in object naming. This has interesting implications for aphasic language. Conference: 10th International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience, Bodrum, Türkiye, 1 Sep - 5 Sep, 2008. Presentation Type: Poster Presentation Topic: Language Citation: Kljajevic V (2008). The impact of visual processing on speech comprehension. Conference Abstract: 10th International Conference on Cognitive Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/conf.neuro.09.2009.01.252 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 09 Dec 2008; Published Online: 09 Dec 2008. * Correspondence: Vanja Kljajevic, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, vanja.kljajevic@gmail.com Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Vanja Kljajevic Google Vanja Kljajevic Google Scholar Vanja Kljajevic PubMed Vanja Kljajevic Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page." @default.
• W161021606 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W161021606 creator A5023348635 @default.
• W161021606 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W161021606 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W161021606 title "The impact of visual processing on speech comprehension" @default.
• W161021606 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.neuro.09.2009.01.252" @default.
• W161021606 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W161021606 type Work @default.
• W161021606 sameAs 161021606 @default.
• W161021606 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W161021606 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W161021606 hasAuthorship W161021606A5023348635 @default.
• W161021606 hasBestOaLocation W1610216061 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C204321447 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C2777530160 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C2778251979 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C2780378701 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C2780522230 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W161021606 hasConcept C511192102 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C138885662 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C15744967 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C169760540 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C180747234 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C204321447 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C26760741 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C2777530160 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C2778251979 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C2780378701 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C2780522230 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C41008148 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C41895202 @default.
• W161021606 hasConceptScore W161021606C511192102 @default.
• W161021606 hasLocation W1610216061 @default.
• W161021606 hasOpenAccess W161021606 @default.
• W161021606 hasPrimaryLocation W1610216061 @default.
• W161021606 hasRelatedWork W2010691059 @default.
• W161021606 hasRelatedWork W2017997024 @default.
• W161021606 hasRelatedWork W2029286860 @default.
• W161021606 hasRelatedWork W2030169664 @default.
• W161021606 hasRelatedWork W2094491918 @default.
• W161021606 hasRelatedWork W2144920283 @default.
• W161021606 hasRelatedWork W2402074820 @default.
• W161021606 hasRelatedWork W2807054640 @default.
• W161021606 hasRelatedWork W4213375194 @default.
• W161021606 hasRelatedWork W4297009505 @default.
• W161021606 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W161021606 isParatext "false" @default.
• W161021606 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W161021606 magId "161021606" @default.
• W161021606 workType "article" @default.