FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1615678725> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1615678725 abstract "Introduction: The treatment of patients with a chronic condition is challenging the sustainability of healthcare systems worldwide. One possibility to utilize healthcare resources more efficiently is to enhance self-management of patients. However, self-management has not found a commonplace in chronic healthcare and one of the reasons is the lack of self-management support (SMS) given by healthcare professionals. To improve SMS, an assessment of the quality of current SMS in a healthcare organization is necessary. The Primary Care Resources and Support for Chronic Disease Self-management (PCRS) is an instrument to measure the quality of SMS, but evidence on its validity and reliability is limited. In this study we assessed the validity and reliability of the PCRS. Objective: The goal of this study is to assess the validity and reliability of the PCRS in measuring the quality of SMS by healthcare professionals. Method: In this observational study, we collected data on SMS in healthcare organization to investigate the face-, construct- and discriminant validity, as well as the reliability of the PCRS. We translated the PCRS from English to Dutch according to WHO recommendations. We asked health care professionals from general and specialized healthcare organizations to complete the PCRS, ACIC and CS-PAM and to assess the understandability and applicability of each individual item of the PCRS for face validity. The correlation between the self-management scale of the ACIC and the PCRS was a measure for construct validity, while the lack of a correlation between the CSPAM and the PCRS was a measure for discriminant validity. To measure its reliability, we compared the correlation between the total score on t=0 to the total score on t=1, two weeks thereafter. Also, we assessed point reliability on t=0. Results: Data from 50 healthcare professionals showed that most items of the PCRS were considered to be completely understandable and relevant. The PCRS total score correlated strongly with the total score of the ACIC SMS subscale (r=.730, p.005). Finally, Cronbach's and Guttmann's λ, measuring respectively the test-retest and point-reliability, were high (r>0.9). Conclusion: We found evidence that the PCRS is a valid and reliable tool to assess the quality of SMS and is applicable for chronic healthcare. The PCRS consists of understandable items appropriate to assess SMS. It measures self-management support by healthcare professionals in an objective manner; it does not reflect the perception of healthcare professional on their selfmanagement support. Discussion: Healthcare professionals who want to assess the quality of SMS, can use to the PCRS as a valid and reliable assessment tool. Based on its outcomes, the PCRS may direct the development of a tailored improvement plan, focusing on SMS during patient consultation as well as the organization of SMS. Future studies should investigate the added value of the PCRS in improving the quality of SMS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]" @default.
• W1615678725 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1615678725 creator A5015729540 @default.
• W1615678725 creator A5029555061 @default.
• W1615678725 creator A5033583346 @default.
• W1615678725 creator A5040585461 @default.
• W1615678725 creator A5069633579 @default.
• W1615678725 creator A5075063836 @default.
• W1615678725 date "2015-05-27" @default.
• W1615678725 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W1615678725 title "Validation of the Primacy Care Resources and Support for Chronic Disease Self-Management (PCRS): An assessment tool for the quality of self-management support" @default.
• W1615678725 doi "https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.2180" @default.
• W1615678725 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1615678725 type Work @default.
• W1615678725 sameAs 1615678725 @default.
• W1615678725 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W1615678725 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1615678725 hasAuthorship W1615678725A5015729540 @default.
• W1615678725 hasAuthorship W1615678725A5029555061 @default.
• W1615678725 hasAuthorship W1615678725A5033583346 @default.
• W1615678725 hasAuthorship W1615678725A5040585461 @default.
• W1615678725 hasAuthorship W1615678725A5069633579 @default.
• W1615678725 hasAuthorship W1615678725A5075063836 @default.
• W1615678725 hasBestOaLocation W16156787251 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C198783460 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C2776933761 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C2779734285 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C2982889124 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C71405471 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C111472728 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C119857082 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C127413603 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C138885662 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C142724271 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C144133560 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C15744967 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C159110408 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C195094911 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C198783460 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C21547014 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C2776933761 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C2779134260 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C2779530757 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C2779734285 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C2982889124 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C41008148 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C56739046 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C71405471 @default.
• W1615678725 hasConceptScore W1615678725C71924100 @default.
• W1615678725 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W1615678725 hasLocation W16156787251 @default.
• W1615678725 hasLocation W16156787252 @default.
• W1615678725 hasLocation W16156787253 @default.
• W1615678725 hasLocation W16156787254 @default.
• W1615678725 hasOpenAccess W1615678725 @default.
• W1615678725 hasPrimaryLocation W16156787251 @default.
• W1615678725 hasRelatedWork W1489489188 @default.
• W1615678725 hasRelatedWork W1983339212 @default.
• W1615678725 hasRelatedWork W1991119787 @default.
• W1615678725 hasRelatedWork W2020868722 @default.
• W1615678725 hasRelatedWork W2361797294 @default.
• W1615678725 hasRelatedWork W2368458841 @default.
• W1615678725 hasRelatedWork W2417933374 @default.
• W1615678725 hasRelatedWork W2491570889 @default.
• W1615678725 hasRelatedWork W271288110 @default.
• W1615678725 hasRelatedWork W2461405008 @default.
• W1615678725 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W1615678725 isParatext "false" @default.
• W1615678725 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W1615678725 magId "1615678725" @default.
• W1615678725 workType "article" @default.