FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W162152186> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W162152186 startingPage "286" @default.
• W162152186 abstract "The purpose of this study was (a) to investigate preservice teacher education students' (n=145) performance on the Academic Misconduct Survey (AMS), a measure of self-reported academic misconduct, and (b) to examine the relationship between AMS scores and scores on the Defining Issues Test (DIT), a measure of principled moral reasoning. A large percentage of participants reported engaging in academic misconduct. No significant association between scores on the AMS and the DIT was found. Results of the study indicate the need for additional research that examines ethical behaviors and moral reasoning in prospective and practicing teachers. ********** Over the past 50 years, numerous studies have reported that cheating, academic dishonesty, and other forms of academic misconduct among college students appear to be the rule rather than the exception, and the deviant student has been described as one who has not engaged in academic misconduct at one time or another (Hollinger & Lanza-Kaduce, 1996). Research interest in college student cheating began in the early 1960s when Bowers (1964) surveyed more than 5,000 undergraduate students at 99 different institutions. Bowers found that three out of four students admitted to various kinds of academic dishonesty, such as plagiarism, copying another student's test answers, sneaking crib notes into exams, collaborating with other students on homework assignments when not permitted by the instructor, or lying to the instructor about reasons for late papers. McCabe and Trevino (1993) found similar results in a survey of over 6,000 undergraduate students at 31 campuses. Two of three of those surveyed admitted engaging in questionable academic behaviors, such as using unauthorized crib notes on a test, copying from another student on a test, or collaborating with other students on homework assignments without instructor approval. More recent studies consistently report rates of cheating over 70 percent (see Chidley, 1997; Hollinger & Lanza-Kaduce, 1996; Lupton, Chapman, & Weiss, 2000) with cheating behaviors similar to those described by Bowers (see Hollinger & Lanza-Kaduce, 1996; Lupton, Chapman, & Weiss, 2000; Tang & Zuo, 1997; Thorpe, Pittenger, & Reed, 1999). Causes of College Student Cheating Investigations of specific causes of academic dishonesty usually are divided into two categories: (a) studies that focus on situational and institutional factors, and (b) studies that focus on individual traits of students. Situational and Institutional Factors A number of situational and institutional factors associated with academic misconduct have been identified. Students most likely to cheat have lower academic standing, are more concerned about attaining high grades than gaining knowledge, and are enrolled in larger rather than smaller institutions (Bowers, 1964; Nowell, & Laufer, 1997; Smith, Nolan, & Dai, 1998; Tang, & Zuo, 1997; Thorpe, Pittenger, & Reed, 1999). Also, rates of cheating are higher when instructors trust students to be honest, and rates are lower when students perceive a strong threat of being caught and punished (Hollinger & Lanza-Kaduce, 1996). Finally, students who attend college to obtain a credential or license are more inclined to cheat than those who attend for other reasons (Daniel, Blount, & Ferrell, 1991; McCabe & Trevino, 1996; Stern & Havlicek, 1986). According to McCabe and Trevino (1996), Today's college students ... have come to college to get a credential-a credential that will allow them to pursue a chosen career. How they get that credential is often less important than simply getting it. As a student at a major university ... said to us, It's amazing how many students don't think twice about cheating or copying others' work. It shows how little they understand what an education really is. …" @default.
• W162152186 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W162152186 creator A5013571960 @default.
• W162152186 creator A5065270592 @default.
• W162152186 creator A5066515733 @default.
• W162152186 creator A5073482280 @default.
• W162152186 date "2002-12-01" @default.
• W162152186 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W162152186 title "Academic Misconduct in Undergraduate Teacher Education Students and Its Relationship to Their Principled Moral Reasoning" @default.
• W162152186 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W162152186 type Work @default.
• W162152186 sameAs 162152186 @default.
• W162152186 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W162152186 countsByYear W1621521862012 @default.
• W162152186 countsByYear W1621521862013 @default.
• W162152186 countsByYear W1621521862014 @default.
• W162152186 countsByYear W1621521862015 @default.
• W162152186 countsByYear W1621521862016 @default.
• W162152186 countsByYear W1621521862018 @default.
• W162152186 countsByYear W1621521862020 @default.
• W162152186 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W162152186 hasAuthorship W162152186A5013571960 @default.
• W162152186 hasAuthorship W162152186A5065270592 @default.
• W162152186 hasAuthorship W162152186A5066515733 @default.
• W162152186 hasAuthorship W162152186A5073482280 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C2776603611 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C2778024590 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C2778585151 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C2779151265 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C2780587575 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W162152186 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C145420912 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C151730666 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C15744967 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C17744445 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C199539241 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C2776603611 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C2777267654 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C2778024590 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C2778585151 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C2779151265 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C2780587575 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C77805123 @default.
• W162152186 hasConceptScore W162152186C86803240 @default.
• W162152186 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W162152186 hasLocation W1621521861 @default.
• W162152186 hasOpenAccess W162152186 @default.
• W162152186 hasPrimaryLocation W1621521861 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W140236623 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W152078894 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W1523643708 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W1589166045 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W171830801 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W1978283268 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W1991976654 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W1995742667 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W2031842255 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W2036491738 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W2074014298 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W2095761161 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W2098862431 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W2134103030 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W2134369371 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W2299065660 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W2992157477 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W2992629658 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W2994042332 @default.
• W162152186 hasRelatedWork W3023934668 @default.
• W162152186 hasVolume "29" @default.
• W162152186 isParatext "false" @default.
• W162152186 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W162152186 magId "162152186" @default.
• W162152186 workType "article" @default.