FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1625376280> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1625376280 endingPage "934" @default.
• W1625376280 startingPage "895" @default.
• W1625376280 abstract "Delegation by the registered nurse is a decision making process that includes assessment, planning, implementation, and evaluation. Due to an ever-expanding global shortage of nurses, registered nurses are increasingly dependent on unlicensed assistive personnel to assist in the provision of safe patient care. Delegation is recognised as a fundamental nursing skill that can be utilised effectively to improve quality care.To examine and synthesize the best available evidence regarding the impact of delegation interventions used by the registered nurse with the unlicensed assistive personnel and their impact on quality of care, patient satisfaction, and registered nurse staff satisfaction.Registered nurses and unlicensed assistive personnel in patient care settings where delegation occurs.This review considered studies that evaluated the effectiveness of delegation interventions by registered nurses to unlicensed assistive personnel.The outcomes examined were quality of care, patient satisfaction, and/or registered nurse staff satisfaction as measured by validated and reliable tools.The review first considered randomised controlled trials; in their absence other research designs, such as non-randomised controlled trials, or other quasi-experimental studies, observational studies and descriptive studies were considered for inclusion in the systematic review.The search strategy aimed to find both published and unpublished studies in the English language from the inception of the included databases through December 2011. The databases searched included the Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Healthsource Nursing/Academic edition, and PsycINFO. A search of the grey literature and electronic hand searching of relevant journals was also performed.The studies selected for retrieval were critically evaluated by two independent reviewers for methodological quality using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute.Data were extracted using standardised data extraction instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute.Studies were found to have significant heterogeneity between the populations and interventions of the included studies; therefore, pooled statistical meta-analysis could not be completed. The findings are presented in narrative form.Two quasi-experimental studies were identified. In one study, the women counselled by the lay nurse aides received 80% of recommended messages compared to 75% received by the women counselled by the nurse-midwives (β= 4.7, 95%CI: -1.7, 11.0; Non-inferiority). Non-inferiority was demonstrated between the lay nurse aides and the nurse-midwives with respect to communication techniques. The mean performance was high, 95% and 98% among nurse-midwives and lay nurse aides respectively (β =2.4, 95%CI: -0.2, 5.0; Non-inferiority). No difference was found between the nurse-midwives and the lay nurse aides in providing antenatal counselling, education, and maternal-newborn care when proper training and supervision was given. The other study examined six hypotheses that looked at quality of care outcomes in a care model where the registered nurse delegated tasks to unlicensed assistive personal. Five of these outcomes showed no significant improvement as a result of the intervention. Patient knowledge about intravenous therapy was the only quality of care outcome that showed improvement post-intervention with scores increasing from 27% at baseline to 78% at 12 months. There was no improvement in the one hypotheses evaluating registered nurses job satisfaction.There is a paucity of evidence on the effectiveness of delegation interventions and strategies by registered nurses to unlicensed assistive personnel. Delegation interventions require characteristics such as teamwork, training, support, supervision, communication, and evaluation to positively impact quality of care, patient satisfaction, and registered nurse staff satisfaction outcomes.Task shifting could have a positive impact on quality of care and staff satisfaction while providing the registered nurse with an opportunity to increase efficiency.The areas of feedback and evaluation in the registered nurse / unlicensed assistive personnel relationship needs further study." @default.
• W1625376280 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1625376280 creator A5033552080 @default.
• W1625376280 creator A5049751079 @default.
• W1625376280 creator A5066977603 @default.
• W1625376280 creator A5080567837 @default.
• W1625376280 creator A5084480086 @default.
• W1625376280 creator A5089952912 @default.
• W1625376280 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W1625376280 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W1625376280 title "The effectiveness of delegation interventions by the registered nurse to the unlicensed assistive personnel and their impact on quality of care, patient satisfaction, and RN staff satisfaction: a systematic review" @default.
• W1625376280 cites W1642310120 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W1970099705 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W1993424163 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W1994994810 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W1998247512 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W2003786812 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W2022274687 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W2038746872 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W2040510571 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W2044482556 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W2044805863 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W2050899123 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W2074425839 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W2098046635 @default.
• W1625376280 cites W2157281784 @default.
• W1625376280 doi "https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2012-65" @default.
• W1625376280 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27820462" @default.
• W1625376280 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W1625376280 type Work @default.
• W1625376280 sameAs 1625376280 @default.
• W1625376280 citedByCount "39" @default.
• W1625376280 countsByYear W16253762802014 @default.
• W1625376280 countsByYear W16253762802018 @default.
• W1625376280 countsByYear W16253762802019 @default.
• W1625376280 countsByYear W16253762802021 @default.
• W1625376280 countsByYear W16253762802022 @default.
• W1625376280 countsByYear W16253762802023 @default.
• W1625376280 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1625376280 hasAuthorship W1625376280A5033552080 @default.
• W1625376280 hasAuthorship W1625376280A5049751079 @default.
• W1625376280 hasAuthorship W1625376280A5066977603 @default.
• W1625376280 hasAuthorship W1625376280A5080567837 @default.
• W1625376280 hasAuthorship W1625376280A5084480086 @default.
• W1625376280 hasAuthorship W1625376280A5089952912 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C113616995 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C121246419 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C147268084 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C2780591783 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C47344431 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConcept C86532276 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C109359841 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C113616995 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C121246419 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C138816342 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C142724271 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C147268084 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C15744967 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C159110408 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C17744445 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C199539241 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C23131810 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C27415008 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C2775944032 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C2779473830 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C2779549880 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C2780591783 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C2781145037 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C47344431 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C71924100 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C77805123 @default.
• W1625376280 hasConceptScore W1625376280C86532276 @default.
• W1625376280 hasIssue "15" @default.
• W1625376280 hasLocation W16253762801 @default.
• W1625376280 hasLocation W16253762802 @default.
• W1625376280 hasOpenAccess W1625376280 @default.
• W1625376280 hasPrimaryLocation W16253762801 @default.
• W1625376280 hasRelatedWork W1532769656 @default.
• W1625376280 hasRelatedWork W221745749 @default.
• W1625376280 hasRelatedWork W2888618478 @default.
• W1625376280 hasRelatedWork W2957946008 @default.
• W1625376280 hasRelatedWork W2984935528 @default.
• W1625376280 hasRelatedWork W4233085347 @default.

• next