FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W1637058827> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W1637058827 endingPage "458" @default.
• W1637058827 startingPage "452" @default.
• W1637058827 abstract "To evaluate the efficacy of fetal intervention using fetal cystoscopy or vesicoamniotic shunting in the treatment of severe lower urinary obstruction (LUTO).A cohort of 111 fetuses with severe LUTO attending two centers between January 1990 and August 2013 were included retrospectively. Fetuses were categorized into three groups based on the method of intervention: (1) fetal cystoscopy, (2) vesicoamniotic shunting or (3) no intervention. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine the probability of survival and normal renal function until 6 months of age by comparing fetal cystoscopy and vesicoamniotic shunting to no fetal intervention.Of the 111 fetuses with severe LUTO that were included in the analysis, fetal cystoscopy was performed in 34, vesicoamniotic shunting was performed in 16 and there was no fetal intervention in 61. Gestational age at diagnosis, method of fetal intervention and cause of bladder obstruction were associated with prognosis. In multivariate analysis and after adjustment for potential confounders (considering all causes of LUTO) the overall probability of survival was significantly higher with fetal cystoscopy and vesicoamniotic shunting when compared to no intervention (adjusted relative risk (ARR), 1.86 (95% CI, 1.01-3.42; P = 0.048) and ARR, 1.73 (95% CI, 1.01-3.08; P = 0.04) respectively). A clear trend for normal renal function was present in the fetal cystoscopy group (ARR, 1.73 (95% CI, 0.97-3.08; P = 0.06)) but was not observed in the vesicoamniotic shunt group (ARR, 1.16 (95% CI, 0.86-1.55; P = 0.33)). In cases in which there was a postnatal diagnosis of posterior urethral valves, fetal cystoscopy was effective in improving both the 6-month survival rate and renal function (ARR, 4.10 (95% CI, 1.75-9.62; P < 0.01) and 2.66 (95% CI, 1.25-5.70; P = 0.01) respectively) while vesicoamniotic shunting was associated only with an improvement in the 6-month survival rate (ARR, 3.76 (95% CI, 1.42-9.97; P < 0.01)) with no effect on renal function (ARR, 1.03 (95% CI, 0.49-2.17, P = 0.93)).Fetal cystoscopy and vesicoamniotic shunting improve the 6-month survival rate in cases of severe LUTO. However, only fetal cystoscopy may prevent impairment of renal function in fetuses with posterior urethral valves. Our data support the idea of performing a subsequent randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of fetal cystoscopy vs vesicoamniotic shunting for severe fetal LUTO." @default.
• W1637058827 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W1637058827 creator A5006705312 @default.
• W1637058827 creator A5006946714 @default.
• W1637058827 creator A5008872099 @default.
• W1637058827 creator A5011581809 @default.
• W1637058827 creator A5015439721 @default.
• W1637058827 creator A5019115111 @default.
• W1637058827 creator A5035840665 @default.
• W1637058827 creator A5036795962 @default.
• W1637058827 creator A5057313719 @default.
• W1637058827 creator A5086930908 @default.
• W1637058827 date "2015-03-02" @default.
• W1637058827 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W1637058827 title "Fetal intervention for severe lower urinary tract obstruction: a multicenter case-control study comparing fetal cystoscopy with vesicoamniotic shunting" @default.
• W1637058827 cites W1550061059 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W1948307977 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W1971422584 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W1978145896 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W1979409537 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W1982722172 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W1991423355 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W1998061912 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2000937344 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2002753023 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2002975394 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2017812506 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2021089175 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2022395839 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2025932021 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2035212275 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2041307003 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2042401963 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2056429505 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2072215068 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2073311034 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2076203957 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2088812109 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2092483162 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2092818991 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2099897493 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2113996482 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2136928769 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W2171633408 @default.
• W1637058827 cites W4252540661 @default.
• W1637058827 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14652" @default.
• W1637058827 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25157756" @default.
• W1637058827 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W1637058827 type Work @default.
• W1637058827 sameAs 1637058827 @default.
• W1637058827 citedByCount "114" @default.
• W1637058827 countsByYear W16370588272015 @default.
• W1637058827 countsByYear W16370588272016 @default.
• W1637058827 countsByYear W16370588272017 @default.
• W1637058827 countsByYear W16370588272018 @default.
• W1637058827 countsByYear W16370588272019 @default.
• W1637058827 countsByYear W16370588272020 @default.
• W1637058827 countsByYear W16370588272021 @default.
• W1637058827 countsByYear W16370588272022 @default.
• W1637058827 countsByYear W16370588272023 @default.
• W1637058827 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W1637058827 hasAuthorship W1637058827A5006705312 @default.
• W1637058827 hasAuthorship W1637058827A5006946714 @default.
• W1637058827 hasAuthorship W1637058827A5008872099 @default.
• W1637058827 hasAuthorship W1637058827A5011581809 @default.
• W1637058827 hasAuthorship W1637058827A5015439721 @default.
• W1637058827 hasAuthorship W1637058827A5019115111 @default.
• W1637058827 hasAuthorship W1637058827A5035840665 @default.
• W1637058827 hasAuthorship W1637058827A5036795962 @default.
• W1637058827 hasAuthorship W1637058827A5057313719 @default.
• W1637058827 hasAuthorship W1637058827A5086930908 @default.
• W1637058827 hasBestOaLocation W16370588271 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConcept C172680121 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConcept C2778248742 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConcept C2778376644 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConcept C2778769751 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConceptScore W1637058827C126322002 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConceptScore W1637058827C141071460 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConceptScore W1637058827C172680121 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConceptScore W1637058827C2778248742 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConceptScore W1637058827C2778376644 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConceptScore W1637058827C2778769751 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConceptScore W1637058827C2779234561 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConceptScore W1637058827C54355233 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConceptScore W1637058827C71924100 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConceptScore W1637058827C77411442 @default.
• W1637058827 hasConceptScore W1637058827C86803240 @default.
• W1637058827 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W1637058827 hasLocation W16370588271 @default.
• W1637058827 hasLocation W16370588272 @default.
• W1637058827 hasOpenAccess W1637058827 @default.

• next